Comparison of (semi-)automatic and manually adjusted measurements of left ventricular function in dual source computed tomography using three different software tools

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 787-794

  De Jonge, G J ^a   Van Ooijen, P M A ^a   Overbosch, J ^a   Gueorguieva, A Litcheva ^b   Janssen Van Der Weide, M C ^a   Oudkerk, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b Hospital Moncloa   (Spain)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Dual source computed tomography; Function; Heart; Left ventricular function; Software comparison

Indexed keywords

IOMEPROL;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; AUTOMATION; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL SOURCE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDSYSTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART MUSCLE MASS; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MALE; RR INTERVAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUTOMATION, LABORATORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; STROKE VOLUME; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 83955161814     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: 15730743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9727-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA et al (1987) Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation 76(1):44-51 (Pubitemid 17093191)
2. Hammermeister KE, DeRouen TA, Dodge HT (1979) Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease: Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations. Circulation 59: 421-430 (Pubitemid 9129652)
3. Shah PK, Maddahi J, Staniloff HM et al (1986) Variable spectrum and prognostic implications of left and right ventricular ejection fraction in patients with and without clinical heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 58:387-393 (Pubitemid 16052660)
4. Brodoefel H, Kramer U, Reimann A et al (2007) Dualsource CT with improved temporal resolution in assessment of left ventricular function: A pilot study. AJR 189: 1064-1070 (Pubitemid 350032992)
5. Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S et al (2005) Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: Comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology 234: 381-390 (Pubitemid 40139906)
6. Myerson SG, Bellenger NG, Pennell DJ (2002) Assessment of left ventricular mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Hypertension 39(3):750-755 (Pubitemid 34252869)
7. Sandstede J, Lipke C, Beer M et al (2000) Age- and gender- specific differences in left and right ventricular cardiac function and mass determined by cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 10(3):438-442 (Pubitemid 30145755)
8. Vogel-Claussen J, Finn JP, Gomes AS et al (2006) Left ventricular papillary muscle mass: Relationship to left ventricular mass and volumes by magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:426-432 (Pubitemid 43922260)
9. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2006) Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 16:2739-2747 (Pubitemid 44823927)
10. Pugliese F et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 16:575-582 (Pubitemid 44149369)
11. Bastarrika G, Arraiza M, Pueyo JC et al (2008) Quantification of left ventricular function and mass in cardiac dualsource CT (DSCT) exams: Comparison of manual and semiautomatic segmentation algorithms. Eur Radiol 18: 939-946
12. Cury RC, Nieman K, Shapiro MD et al (2008) Comprehensive assessment of myocardial perfusion defects, regional wall motion, and left ventricular function by using 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology 248:466-475
13. Busch S, Johnson TR, Wintersperger BJ et al (2008) Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with dual-source CT in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Initial findings. Eur Radiol 18:570-575 (Pubitemid 351248185)
14. Mahnken AH, Mühlenbruch G, Koos R et al (2006) Automated vs. manual assessment of left ventricular function in cardiac multidetector row computed tomography: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 16:1416-1423 (Pubitemid 43871812)
15. Boehm T, Alkadhi H, Roffi M et al (2004) Time-effectiveness, observer-dependence, and accuracy of measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction using 4-channel MDCT. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 176:529-537 (Pubitemid 38724246)
16. Juergens KU, Seifarth H, Range F et al (2008) Automated threshold-based 3D segmentation versus short-axis planimetry for assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source MDCT. AJR 190:308-314 (Pubitemid 351196599)
17. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1:307-310 (Pubitemid 16134762)
18. Gerber TC, Kuzo RS, Morin RL (2005) Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:165-176 (Pubitemid 41149239)
19. Dulce MC, Mostbeck GH, Friese KK et al (1993) Quantification of the left ventricular volumes and function with cine MR imaging: Comparison of geometric models with three-dimensional data. Radiology 188:371-376 (Pubitemid 23216254)
20. Plumhans C, Keil S, Ocklenburg C et al (2009) Comparison of manual, semi- and fully automated heart segmentation for global left ventricular function in multidetector computed tomography. Invest Radiol 44(8):476-482
21. Mühlenbruch G, Das M, Hohl C et al (2006) Global left ventricular function in cardiac CT. Evaluation of an automated 3D region-growing segmentation algorithm. Eur Radiol 16:1117-1123
22. Krishnam MS, Tomasian A, Iv M et al (2008) Left ventricular ejection fraction using 64-slice CT coronary angiography and new evaluation software: Initial experience. Br J Radiol 81(966):450-455 (Pubitemid 351957755)
23. De Jonge GJ, Van Ooijen PMA, Van der Vleuten PA et al. (2009) The reliability of automatic measurement of left ventricular function with dual-source computed tomography datasets. Eur Radiol [epub ahead of print]