Quantification of left ventricular function and mass in cardiac Dual-Source CT (DSCT) exams: Comparison of manual and semiautomatic segmentation algorithms

European Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 939-946

  Bastarrika, Gorka ^a   Arraiza, María ^a   Pueyo, Jesús C ^a   Herraiz, María J ^a   Zudaire, Beatriz ^a   Villanueva, Alberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cardiac mass; Dual source computed tomography (DSCT); Heart function; Left ventricle; Segmentation; Time effectiveness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DUAL SOURCE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MANUAL SEGMENTATION ALGORITHM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SEMIAUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION ALGORITHM; TIME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTROPHY, LEFT VENTRICULAR; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 52049124017     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0849-x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. HD White RM Norris MA Brown PW Brandt RM Whitlock CJ Wild 1987 Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction Circulation 76 1 44 51 3594774 1:STN:280:BiiB2cvnvVw%3D
2. KE Hammermeister TA DeRouen HT Dodge 1979 Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations Circulation 59 3 421 430 761323 1:STN:280:CSaC3crnvVI%3D
3. T Buck P Hunold KU Wentz W Tkalec HJ Nesser R Erbel 1997 Tomographic three-dimensional echocardiographic determination of chamber size and systolic function in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging, cineventriculography, and two-dimensional echocardiography Circulation 96 12 4286 4297 9416895 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FnslektQ%3D%3D
4. CD Bavelaar-Croon HW Kayser EE van der Wall A de Roos P Dibbets-Schneider EK Pauwels, et al. 2000 Left ventricular function: correlation of quantitative gated SPECT and MR imaging over a wide range of values Radiology 217 2 572 575 11058662 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crhtFChsw%3D%3D
5. MJ Lipton DW Farmer EJ Killebrew A Bouchard PB Dean HG Ringertz, et al. 1985 Regional myocardial dysfunction: evaluation of patients with prior myocardial infarction with fast CT Radiology 157 3 735 740 4059561 1:STN:280:BimD2czktFM%3D
6. NG Bellenger MI Burgess SG Ray A Lahiri AJ Coats JG Cleland, et al. 2000 Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J 21 16 1387 1396 10952828 10.1053/euhj.2000.2011 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvot1CltQ%3D%3D
7. DJ Pennell UP Sechtem CB Higgins WJ Manning GM Pohost FE Rademakers, et al. 2004 Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report Eur Heart J 25 21 1940 1965 15522474 10.1016/j.ehj.2004. 06.040
8. J Sandstede C Lipke M Beer S Hofmann T Pabst W Kenn, et al. 2000 Age-and gender-specific differences in left and right ventricular cardiac function and mass determined by cine magnetic resonance imaging Eur Radiol 10 3 438 442 10756992 10.1007/s003300050072 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3itVCqsw%3D%3D
9. S Natori S Lai JP Finn AS Gomes WG Hundley M Jerosch-Herold, et al. 2006 Cardiovascular function in multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: normal values by age, sex, and ethnicity AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 6 Suppl 2 S357 S365 16714609 10.2214/AJR.04.1868
10. SG Myerson NG Bellenger DJ Pennell 2002 Assessment of left ventricular mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance Hypertension 39 3 750 755 11897757 10.1161/hy0302.104674 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XisVehtrs%3D
11. MJ Garcia J Lessick MH Hoffmann 2006 Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis JAMA 296 4 403 411 16868298 10.1001/jama.296.4.403 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xntlals74%3D
12. AH Mahnken R Koos M Katoh E Spuentrup P Busch JE Wildberger, et al. 2005 Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction Eur Radiol 15 4 714 720 15682266 10.1007/s00330-004-2592-x
13. RC Cury K Nieman MD Shapiro K Nasir RC Cury TJ Brady 2007 Comprehensive cardiac CT study: evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and myocardial perfusion-is it possible? J Nucl Cardiol 14 2 229 243 17386386 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.01.035
14. T Schlosser OK Mohrs A Magedanz T Voigtlander A Schmermund J Barkhausen 2007 Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using 64-detector-row CT: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging Acta Radiol 48 1 30 35 17325922 10.1080/02841850601067611 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s7isF2qtQ%3D%3D
15. M Grude KU Juergens T Wichter M Paul EM Fallenberg JG Muller, et al. 2003 Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging Invest Radiol 38 10 653 661 14501493 10.1097/01.rli.0000077070.40713.76
16. KU Juergens M Grude D Maintz EM Fallenberg T Wichter W Heindel, et al. 2004 Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience Radiology 230 2 403 410 14668428 10.1148/radiol.2302030042
17. T Schlosser K Pagonidis CU Herborn P Hunold KU Waltering TC Lauenstein, et al. 2005 Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 3 765 773 15728595
18. TG Flohr CH McCollough H Bruder M Petersilka K Gruber C Suss, et al. 2006 First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system Eur Radiol 16 2 256 268 16341833 10.1007/s00330-005-2919-2
19. TR Johnson K Nikolaou BJ Wintersperger AW Leber F von Ziegler C Rist, et al. 2006 Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience Eur Radiol 16 7 1409 1415 16770652 10.1007/s00330-006-0298-y
20. H Scheffel H Alkadhi A Plass R Vachenauer L Desbiolles O Gaemperli, et al. 2006 Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control Eur Radiol 16 12 2739 2747 17031451 10.1007/s00330-006-0474-0
21. S Achenbach D Ropers A Kuettner T Flohr B Ohnesorge H Bruder, et al. 2006 Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography-initial experience Eur J Radiol 57 3 331 335 16426789 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.017
22. R Manzke P Koken D Hawkes M Grass 2005 Helical cardiac cone beam CT reconstruction with large area detectors: a simulation study Phys Med Biol 50 7 1547 1568 15798343 10.1088/0031-9155/50/7/016 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7ms1egtw%3D%3D
23. J Blobel H Baartman P Rogalla J Mews A Lembcke 2003 Spatial and temporal resolution with 16-slice computed tomography for cardiac imaging Fortschr Röntgenstr 175 9 1264 1271 10.1055/s-2003-41925 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3svitlemuw%3D%3D
24. AH Mahnken G Muhlenbruch R Koos S Stanzel PS Busch M Niethammer, et al. 2006 Automated vs. manual assessment of left ventricular function in cardiac multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging Eur Radiol 16 7 1416 1423 16607495 10.1007/s00330-006-0226-1
25. G Mühlenbruch M Das C Hohl JE Wildberger D Rinck TG Flohr, et al. 2006 Global left ventricular function in cardiac CT. Evaluation of an automated 3D region-growing segmentation algorithm Eur Radiol 16 5 1117 1123 16372162 10.1007/s00330-005-0079-z
26. TG Flohr K Stierstorfer S Ulzheimer H Bruder AN Primak CH McCollough 2005 Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot Med Phys 32 8 2536 2547 16193784 10.1118/1.1949787 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MritVGmsQ%3D%3D
27. JM Bland DG Altman 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 8476 307 310 2868172 1:STN:280:BimC3MjhvFc%3D
28. LI Lin 1989 A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility Biometrics 45 1 255 268 2720055 10.2307/2532051 1:STN:280:BiaB2cjmvVA%3D
29. PA van der Vleuten TP Willems MJ Gotte RA Tio MJ Greuter F Zijlstra, et al. 2006 Quantification of global left ventricular function: comparison of multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. a meta-analysis and review of the current literature Acta Radiol 47 10 1049 1057 17135007 10.1080/02841850600977760
30. B Belge E Coche A Pasquet JL Vanoverschelde BL Gerber 2006 Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging Eur Radiol 16 7 1424 1433 16518654 10.1007/s00330-006-0169-6
31. LP Salm JD Schuijf A de Roos HJ Lamb HW Vliegen JW Jukema, et al. 2006 Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance Eur J Echocardiogr 7 4 308 314 16098814 10.1016/j.euje.2005.07.002
32. L Sugeng V Mor-Avi L Weinert J Niel C Ebner R Steringer-Mascherbauer, et al. 2006 Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference Circulation 114 7 654 661 16894035 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.626143
33. S Leschka S Wildermuth T Boehm L Desbiolles L Husmann A Plass, et al. 2006 Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality Radiology 241 2 378 385 16966483 10.1148/radiol.2412051384
34. BJ Wintersperger K Nikolaou F von Ziegler T Johnson C Rist A Leber, et al. 2006 Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed Invest Radiol 41 5 436 442 16625106 10.1097/01.rli.0000202639.99949.c6
35. S Schroeder AF Kopp A Kuettner C Burgstahler C Herdeg M Heuschmid, et al. 2002 Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients Clin Imaging 26 2 106 111 11852217 10.1016/S0899-7071(01)00371-0
36. U Gleichmann D Fassbender G Trieb H Mannebach H Ohlmeier 1982 The influence of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists with and without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity on local wall motion abnormalities in patients with coronary heart disease Br J Clin Pharmacol 13 Suppl 2 301S 304S 6125180 1:STN:280:Bi2B2Mjgt1w%3D
37. B Silke SP Verma MA Frais G Reynolds SH Taylor 1986 Comparative effects of metoprolol and celiprolol on cardiac hemodynamics and left ventricular volume at rest and during exercise-induced angina Clin Pharmacol Ther 39 1 5 14 2935349 1:STN:280:BimC3cjgsVQ%3D
38. AH Mahnken C Hohl C Suess H Bruder G Muhlenbruch M Das, et al. 2006 Influence of heart rate and temporal resolution on left-ventricular volumes in cardiac multislice spiral computed tomography: a phantom study Invest Radiol 41 5 429 435 16625105 10.1097/01.rli.0000202638.94530.4f
39. AH Mahnken E Spuentrup M Niethammer A Buecker J Boese JE Wildberger, et al. 2003 Quantitative and qualitative assessment of left ventricular volume with ECG-gated multislice spiral CT: value of different image reconstruction algorithms in comparison to MRI Acta Radiol 44 6 604 611 14616204 10.1080/02841850312331287799 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srjs1ejsQ%3D%3D
40. JM Boese ML Bahner J Albers G van Kaick 2000 Optimizing temporal resolution in CT with retrospective ECG gating Radiologe 40 2 123 129 10758625 10.1007/s001170050020 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3itFOqtw%3D%3D
41. AH Mahnken H Bruder C Suess G Muhlenbruch P Bruners C Hohl, et al. 2007 Dual-source computed tomography for assessing cardiac function: A phantom study Invest Radiol 42 7 491 498 17568271 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3180336ca1
42. T Boehm H Alkadhi M Roffi JK Willmann LM Desbiolles B Marincek, et al. 2004 Time-effectiveness, observer-dependence, and accuracy of measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction using 4-channel MDCT Fortschr Röntgenstr 176 4 529 537 10.1055/s-2004-813012 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7pt1Wjtw%3D%3D
43. CH McCollough AN Primak O Saba H Bruder K Stierstorfer R Raupach, et al. 2007 Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner Radiology 243 3 775 784 17446525 10.1148/radiol.2433061165
44. C Becker M Schatzl H Feist A Bauml UJ Schopf G Michalski, et al. 1999 [Assessment of the effective dose for routine protocols in conventional CT, electron beam CT and coronary angiography] Fortschr Röntgenstr 170 1 99 104 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7ntFSntQ%3D%3D
45. T Trabold M Buchgeister A Kuttner M Heuschmid AF Kopp S Schroder, et al. 2003 Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating Fortschr Röntgenstr 175 8 1051 1055 10.1055/s-2003-40926 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szltlyksw%3D%3D
46. M Yamamuro E Tadamura S Kanao YW Wu K Tambara M Komeda, et al. 2007 Coronary angiography by 64-detector row computed tomography using low dose of contrast material with saline chaser: influence of total injection volume on vessel attenuation J Comput Assist Tomogr 31 2 272 280 17414766 10.1097/01.rct.0000236422.35761.a1
47. F Cademartiri N Mollet A van der Lugt K Nieman PM Pattynama PJ de Feyter, et al. 2004 Non-invasive 16-row multislice CT coronary angiography: usefulness of saline chaser Eur Radiol 14 2 178 183 14689227 10.1007/s00330-003-2188-x
48. P Gosse 2005 Left ventricular hypertrophy as a predictor of cardiovascular risk J Hypertens Suppl 23 1 S27 S33 15821448 10.1097/01.hjh. 0000165625.79933.9a 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXjtVOisbw%3D
49. T Kahan 1998 The importance of left ventricular hypertrophy in human hypertension J Hypertens Suppl 16 7 S23 S29 9855028 1:STN:280: DyaK1M%2FntVKksg%3D%3D
50. DW Brown WH Giles JB Croft 2000 Left ventricular hypertrophy as a predictor of coronary heart disease mortality and the effect of hypertension Am Heart J 140 6 848 856 11099987 10.1067/mhj.2000.111112 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3M%2Fnt1ajtg%3D%3D