Criteria for evaluating qualitative studies

Human Resource Development International

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 375-378

  Rocco, Tonette S ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 83755192639     PISSN: 13678868     EISSN: 14698374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13678868.2010.501959     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Caelli, K., Ray, L., and Mill, J., 2003. ‘Clear as mud’:Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2 (2) Article 1. http://www.ualberta.ca/∼iiqm/backissues/pdf/caellietal.pdf (accessed 24 May 2010)
2. Devers, K. J., 1999. How will we know ‘good’ qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in Health Services Research. Health Services Research, 34 (5):1153–1188.
3. Patton, M. Q., 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
4. Rocco, T. S., 2003. Invited. Forum:Shaping the future:writing up the method on qualitative studies. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14 (3):343–349.
5. Smith, M. L., 1987. Publishing qualitative research. American Educational Research Journal, 24 (2):173–183.
6. Taylor, E. W., Beck, J., and Ainsworth, E., 2001. Publishing qualitative adult education research:A peer review perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 33 (2):163–179.