Time Course of Attentional Bias for Gambling Information in Problem Gambling

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 675-682

  Brevers, Damien ^a   Cleeremans, Axel ^a   Bechara, Antoine ^b,c   Laloyaux, Cédric ^a   Kornreich, Charles ^a   Verbanck, Paul ^a   Noël, Xavier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attentional bias; Craving; Dependence; Eye tracking; Gambling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECTIONAL VISION; EYE FIXATION; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; RESPONSE TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SELF REPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CUES; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SELF REPORT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 83755169595     PISSN: 0893164X     EISSN: 19391501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024201     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 1994, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC. 4th ed.
2. Baker T.B., Morse E., Sherman J.E. The motivation to use drugs: A psychobiological analysis of urges. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Alcohol and addictive behavior 1987, 34:257-323. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln. R.A. Dienstbier, P.C. Rivers (Eds.).
3. Beck A.T., Ward C.H., Mendelson M., Mock J., Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 1961, 4:561-571.
4. Boyer M., Dickerson M. Attentional bias and addictive behaviour: Automaticity in a gambling-specific modified Stroop task. Addiction 2003, 98:61-70.
5. Jeux de hasard et d'argent, contextes et addictions 2008, Expertise collective Inserm, INSERM, Paris, INSERM. (2008). Expertise collective: Collective expert report: gambling, context and addiction [Jeux de hasard et d'argent, contexte et addiction]. Paris, INSERM.
6. Field M., Cox W.M. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2008, 97:1-20.
7. Field M., Munafò M.R., Franken I.H. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse. Psychological Bulletin 2009, 135:589-607.
8. First M.B., Spitzer R.L., Gibbon M., Williams J.W. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Non-patient Edition. (SCID-I/NP) 2002, Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.
9. Franken I.H.A. Drug craving and addiction: Integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 2003, 27:563-579.
10. Heishman S.J. What aspects of human performance are truly enhanced by nicotine?. Addiction 1998, 93:317-320.
11. Jones B.C., Jones B.T., Blundell L., Bruce G. Social users of alcohol and cannabis who detect substance-related changes in a change blindness paradigm report higher levels of use than those detecting substance-neutral changes. Psychopharmacology 2002, 165:93-96.
12. Jones B.T., Bruce G., Livingstone S., Reed E. Alcohol-related attentional bias in problem drinkers with the flicker change blindness paradigm. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2006, 20:171-177.
13. Jones B.T., Jones B.C., Smith H., Copely N. A flicker paradigm for inducing change blindness reveals alcohol and cannabis information processing biases in social users. Addiction 2003, 98:235-244.
14. Kavanagh D.J., Andrade J., May J. Imaginary relish and exquisite torture: The elaborated intrusion theory of desire. Psychological Review 2005, 112:446-467.
15. LaBerge D. Computational anatomical models of selective attention in object identification. The cognitive neurosciences 1995, 649-663. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
16. Lawrence A.J., Luty J., Bogdan N.A., Sahakian B.J., Clark L. Impulsivity and response inhibition in alcohol dependence and problem gambling. Psychopharmacology 2009, 207:163-172.
17. Lesieur H.R., Blume S.B. The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry 1987, 144:1184-1188.
18. Molde H., Pallesen S., Saetrevik B., Hammerborg D.K., Laberg J.C., Johnsen B.H. Attentional biases among pathological gamblers. International Gambling Studies 2010, 10:45-49.
19. Nicholls M.E., Orr C.A., Okubo M., Loftus A. Satisfaction Guaranteed: The effect of spacial biases on responses to Likert Scales. Psychological Science 2006, 17:1027-1028.
20. Rensink R.A., O'Regan J.K., Clark J.J. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science 1997, 8:368-373.
21. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews 1993, 18:247-291.
22. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. Addiction. Annual Review of Psychololigy 2003, 54:25-53.
23. Ryan F. Detected, selected, and sometimes neglected: Cognitive processing of cues in addiction. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2002, 10:67-76.
24. Schoenmakers T., Wiers R.W., Field M. Effects of a low dose of alcohol on cognitive biases and craving in heavy drinkers. Psychopharmacology 2008, 197:169-178.
25. Simons D.J., Rensink R.A. Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Science 2005, 9:16-20.
26. Spielberger C. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: STAI (Eorm I) 1983, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
27. Tiffany S.T. A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: Role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychological Review 1990, 97:147-168.
28. van Holst R.J., van den Brink W., Veltman D.J., Goudriaan A.E. Why gamblers fail to win: A review of cognitive and neuroimaging findings in pathological gambling. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2009, 34:87-107.
29. Young M.M., Wohl M.J. The Gambling Craving Scale: Psychometric validation and behavioral outcomes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2009, 23:512-522.