Do Bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus) Amodally Complete Partly Occluded Lines? An Analysis of Line Classification Performance

Journal of Comparative Psychology

Volumn 125, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 411-419

  Nakamura, Noriyuki ^a   Watanabe, Sota ^a   Betsuyaku, Toru ^a   Fujita, Kazuo ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Amodal completion; Bantams; Depth perception; Line classification

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 83755163169     PISSN: 07357036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024629     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aust U., Huber L. Does the use of natural stimuli facilitate amodal completion in pigeons?. Perception 2006, 35:333-349.
2. Bakin J.S., Nakayama K., Gilbert C.D. Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configurations. The Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 20:8188-8198.
3. Blough D.S. Form recognition in pigeons. Animal cognition 1984, 277-289. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. H.L. Roitblat, T.G. Bever, H.S. Terrace (Eds.).
4. Cavoto B.R., Cook R.G. The contribution of monocular depth cues to scene perception by pigeons. Psychological Science 2006, 17:628-634.
5. Cerella J. The pigeon's analysis of pictures. Pattern Recognition 1980, 12:1-6.
6. Cerella J. Shape constancy in the pigeon: The perspective transformations decomposed. Behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation 1990, 145-163. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M.L. Commons, R.J. Herrnstein, S.M. Kosslyn, D.B. Mumford (Eds.).
7. DeMello L.R., Foster T.M., Temple W. Discriminative performance of the domestic hen in a visual acuity task. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1992, 58:147-157.
8. Deruelle C., Barbet I., Dépy D., Fagot J. Perception of partly occluded figures by baboons (Papio papio). Perception 2000, 29:1483-1497.
9. DiPietro N.T., Wasserman E.A., Young M.E. Effects of occlusion on pigeons' visual object recognition. Perception 2002, 31:1299-1312.
10. Fagot J., Barbet I., Parron C., Deruelle C. Amodal completion by baboons (Papio papio): contribution of background depth cues. Primates 2006, 47:145-150.
11. Ferster C.B. Intermittent reinforcement of a complex response in a chimpanzee. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1958, 1:163-165.
12. Forkman B. Hens use occlusion to judge depth in a two-dimensional picture. Perception 1998, 27:861-867.
13. Fujita K. Effects of ratio reinforcement schedules on discrimination performance by Japanese monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1985, 43:225-234.
14. Fujita K. Perceptual completion in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columba livia). Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63:115-125.
15. Fujita K., Blough D.S., Blough P.M. Pigeons see the Ponzo illusion. Animal Learning & Behavior 1991, 19:283-293.
16. Fujita K., Giersch A. What perceptual rules do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) follow in completing partly occluded figures?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2005, 31:387-398.
17. Fujita K., Ushitani T. Better living by not completing: A wonderful peculiarity of pigeon vision?. Behavioural Processes 2005, 69:59-66.
18. Funk M.S. Development of object permanence in the New Zealand parakeet (Cyanoramphus auriceps). Animal Learning & Behavior 1996, 24:375-383.
19. Goto T., Uchiyama I., Imai A., Takahashi S., Hanari T., Nakamura S., Kobari H. Assimilation and contrast in optic illusions. Japanese Psychological Research 2007, 49:33-44.
20. Kanizsa G. Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception 1979, Praeger, New York.
21. Kanizsa G., Renzi P., Conte S., Compostela C., Guerani L. Amodal completion in mouse vision. Perception 1993, 22:713-721.
22. Lazareva O.F., Wasserman E.A., Biederman I. Pigeons' recognition of partially occluded objects depends on specific training experience. Perception 2007, 36:33-48.
23. Lea S.E.G., Slater A.M., Ryan C.M.E. Perception of object unity in chicks: A comparison with the human infant. Infant Behavior and Development 1996, 19:501-504.
24. Nagasaka Y., Lazareva O.F., Wasserman E.A. Prior experience affects amodal completion in pigeons. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69:596-605.
25. Nagasaka Y., Osada Y. Subjective contours, amodal completion, and transparency in animals. The Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology 2000, 50:63-73.
26. Nakamura N., Watanabe S., Betsuyaku T., Fujita K. Do bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus) experience amodal completion? An analysis of visual search performance. Journal of Comparative Psychology 2010, 124:331-335.
27. Nakamura N., Watanabe S., Betsuyaku T., Fujita K. Do birds (pigeons and bantams) know how confident they are of their perceptual decisions?. Animal Cognition 2011, 14:83-93.
28. Nakamura, N., Watanabe, S., & Fujita, K. Spatially anisotropic perception of length in pigeons (Columba livia) and bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus. Unpublished raw data.
29. Okanoya K., Takahashi M. Shikaku-teki hokan e no seitaigaku-teki apuroochi." [Ecological approach to visual completion]. Kokoro no hattatsu: Ninchi-teki seicho no kikoo 2000, 1999:34-41.
30. Pepperberg I.M., Funk M.S. Object permanence in four species of psittacine birds: An African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), an Illiger mini macaw (Ara maracana), a parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus), and a cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus). Animal Learning & Behavior 1990, 18:97-108.
31. Plowright C.M.S., Reid S., Kilian T. Finding hidden food: Behavior on visible displacement tasks by mynahs (Gracula religiosa) and pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of Comparative Psychology 1998, 112:13-25.
32. Rauschenberger R., Yantis S. Masking unveils pre-amodal completion representation in visual search. Nature 2001, 410:369-372.
33. Regolin L., Marconato F., Vallortigara G. Hemispheric differences in the recognition of partly occluded objects by newly hatched domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Animal Cognition 2004, 7:162-170.
34. Regolin L., Vallortigara G. Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks. Perception & Psychophysics 1995, 57:971-976.
35. Reid S., Spetch M.L. Perception of pictorial depth cues by pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1998, 5:698-704.
36. Rubin N. The role of junctions in surface completion and contour matching. Perception 2001, 30:339-366.
37. Sato A., Kanazawa S., Fujita K. Perception of object unity in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Japanese Psychological Research 1997, 39:191-199.
38. Sekuler A.B., Lee J.A.J., Shettleworth S.J. Pigeons do not complete partly occluded figures. Perception 1996, 25:1109-1120.
39. Sekuler A.B., Palmer S.E. Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1992, 121:95-111.
40. Sugita Y. Grouping of image fragments in primary visual cortex. Nature 1999, 401:269-272.
41. Tomonaga M., Imura T. Pacman in the sky with shadows: The effect of cast shadows on the perceptual completion of occluded figures by chimpanzees and humans. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2010, 6:38.
42. Tvardíková K., Fuchs R. Tits use amodal completion in predator recognition: A field experiment. Animal Cognition 2010, 13:609-615.
43. Ushitani T., Fujita K. Pigeons do not perceptually complete partly occluded photos of food: An ecological approach to the " pigeon problem" Behavioural Processes 2005, 69:67-78.
44. Ushitani T., Fujita K., Yamanaka R. Do pigeons (Columba livia) perceive object unity?. Animal Cognition 2001, 4:153-161.
45. Watanabe S., Furuya I. Video display for study of avian visual cognition: From psychophysics to sign language. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 1997, 10:111-127.
46. Winslow C.N. Visual illusions in the chick. Archives of Psychology 1933, 153:1-83.