메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 364-369

A simulation-based scenario to help prepare learners in the management of obstetric emergencies

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; EMERGENCY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT SAFETY; SAFETY;

EID: 83655201365     PISSN: 15592332     EISSN: 1559713X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318228630b     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (6)

References (12)
  • 1
    • 67651113794 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The active components of effective training in obstetric emergencies
    • Siassakos D, Crofts J, Winter C, Weiner C, Draycott T. The active components of effective training in obstetric emergencies. BJOG 2009; 116:1028-1032.
    • (2009) BJOG , vol.116 , pp. 1028-1032
    • Siassakos, D.1    Crofts, J.2    Winter, C.3    Weiner, C.4    Draycott, T.5
  • 2
    • 33644872843 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Simulation training and resident performance of singleton vaginal breech delivery
    • Deering S, Brown J, Hodor J, Satin A. Simulation training and resident performance of singleton vaginal breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:86-89.
    • (2006) Obstet Gynecol , vol.107 , pp. 86-89
    • Deering, S.1    Brown, J.2    Hodor, J.3    Satin, A.4
  • 3
    • 48549107585 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training
    • Draycott T, Crofts J, Ash J, et al. Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:14-20.
    • (2008) Obstet Gynecol , vol.112 , pp. 14-20
    • Draycott, T.1    Crofts, J.2    Ash, J.3
  • 4
    • 34249912004 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Recurrent obstetric management mistakes identified by simulation
    • DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000265208.16659.c9, PII 0000625020070600000007
    • Maslovitz S, Varkai G, Lessing J, Ziv A, Many A. Recurrent obstetric management mistakes identified by simulation. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:1295-1300. (Pubitemid 46869867)
    • (2007) Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol.109 , Issue.6 , pp. 1295-1300
    • Maslovitz, S.1    Barkai, G.2    Lessing, J.B.3    Ziv, A.4    Many, A.5
  • 5
    • 0842308692 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clinical risk management in obstetrics: Eclampsia drills
    • Thompson S, Neal S, Clark V. Clinical risk management in Obstetrics: eclamptic drills. BMJ 2004;328:269-271. (Pubitemid 38168139)
    • (2004) British Medical Journal , vol.328 , Issue.7434 , pp. 269-271
    • Thompson, S.1    Neal, S.2    Clark, V.3
  • 8
    • 55449084663 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Observations from 450 shoulder dystocia simulations: Lessons for skills training
    • Crofts J, Fox R, Ellis D, Winter C, Hinshaw K, Draycott T. Observations from 450 shoulder dystocia simulations: lessons for skills training. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:906-912.
    • (2008) Obstet Gynecol , vol.112 , pp. 906-912
    • Crofts, J.1    Fox, R.2    Ellis, D.3    Winter, C.4    Hinshaw, K.5    Draycott, T.6
  • 9
    • 33644992782 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome?
    • Draycott T, Sibanda T, Owen L, et al. Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome? BJOG 2006;113:177-182.
    • (2006) BJOG , vol.113 , pp. 177-182
    • Draycott, T.1    Sibanda, T.2    Owen, L.3
  • 11
    • 77951434895 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of postsimulation debriefing versus in-simulation debriefing in medical simulation
    • Van Heukelom JN, Begaz T, Treat R. Comparison of postsimulation debriefing versus in-simulation debriefing in medical simulation. Simul Healthc 2010;5:91-97.
    • (2010) Simul Healthc , vol.5 , pp. 91-97
    • Van Heukelom, J.N.1    Begaz, T.2    Treat, R.3
  • 12
    • 34547503567 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • There's no such thing as "nonjudgmental" debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment
    • Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. There's no such thing as "nonjudgmental" debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc 2006;1:49-55.
    • (2006) Simul Healthc , vol.1 , pp. 49-55
    • Rudolph, J.W.1    Simon, R.2    Dufresne, R.L.3    Raemer, D.B.4


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.