Towards a species level tree of the globally diverse genus Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 359-374

  Fuentes Bazan, Susy ^a,b   Mansion, Guilhem ^a   Borsch, Thomas ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Herbario Nacional de Bolivia   (Bolivia)

Author keywords

Angiosperm phylogenetics; Chenopodieae; Chenopodioideae; Chenopodium; ITS; Large genera; Polyploidy; TrnL F

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA; RIBOSOMAL SPACER DNA;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CHENOPODIUM; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLOIDY; PROBABILITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; CHENOPODIUM; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; DNA, RIBOSOMAL SPACER; MARKOV CHAINS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYLOGENY; PLOIDIES; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

ACER PENSYLVANICUM; AMARANTHACEAE; CHENOPODIOIDEAE; CHENOPODIUM; CHENOPODIUM QUINOA; CHENOPODIUM RUBRUM; DYSPHANIA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MONOLEPIS; RHAGODIA; SCLEROBLITUM; SPINACIA; SUCKLEYA; TELOXYS;

EID: 83655184729     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Aellen, P., 1960. Chenopodiaceae. In: Rechinger, K.H., Hegis Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. Band 3. 2 Auflage. Berlin and Hamburg, pp. 533-762.
2. Aellen P., Just T. Key and synopsis of the American species of the genus ChenopodiumL. Am. Midl. Nat. 1943, 30:47-76.
3. Álvarez I., Wendel J.F. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 29:417-434.
4. Baldwin B.G., Wessa B.L. Origin and relationships of the tarweed-silversword lineage (Compositae-Madiinae). Am. J. Bot. 2000, 87:1890-1908.
5. Bentham G. Fl. austral 1870, vol. 5. Loveed Reeved Co., London.
6. Bentham, G., Hooker, J.D., 1880. Chenopodiaceae. In: Genera Plantarum ad exemplaria imprimis in herbariis Kewensibus. Vol. 3, pp. 43-78.
7. Bhargava A., Shukla S., Ohri D. Karyotypic studies on some cultivated and wild species of Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2006, 53:1309-1320.
8. Blöch C., Weiss-Schneeweiss H., Schneeweiss G.M., Barfuss M.H.J., Rebernig C.A., Villaseñor J.L., Stuessy T.F. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of nuclear and plastid DNA sequences support dysploid and polyploid chromosome number changes and reticulate evolution in the diversification of Melampodium (Millerieae, Asteraceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 53:220-233.
9. Bonzani N.E., Barboza G.E., Bugatti M.A., Ariza Espinar L. Morpho-histological studies in the aromatic species of Chenopodium from Argentina. Fitoterapia 2003, 74:207-225.
10. Borsch T., Quandt D. Mutational dynamics and phylogenetic utility of non-coding chloroplast DNA. Plant Syst. Evol. 2009, 282:169-199.
11. Borsch T., Hilu K.W., Quandt D., Wilde V., Neinhuis C., Barthlott W. Non-coding plastid trnT-trnF sequences reveal a well resolved phylogeny of basal angiosperms. J. Evol. Biol. 2003, 16:558-576.
12. Borsch T., Hilu K.W., Wiersema J.H., Löhne C., Barthlott W., Wilde V. Phylogeny of Nymphaea (Nymphaeaceae): evidence from substitutions and microstructural changes in the chloroplast trnT-trnF region. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2007, 168:639-671.
13. Carolin R.C. The trichomes of the Chenopodiaceae and Amaranthaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 1983, 103:451-466.
14. Carolin R.C., Jacobs S.W.L., Maret V. Leaf structure in chenopodiaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 1975, 95:226-255.
15. Chu G.L., Stutz H.C., Sanderson S.C. Morphology and taxonomic position of Suckleya suckleyana (Chenopodiaceae). Am. J. Bot. 1991, 78:63-68.
16. Clemants S.E., Mosyakin S.L. Chenopodium. Flora of North America: Magnoliophyta: Caryophyllidae 2003, vol. 4:275-300. Oxford University Press, New York, (part 1).
17. Croemwell B.T. The micro-estimation and origin of trimethylamine in Chenopodium vulvaria L. Biochem. J. 1950, 46:578-582.
18. Eckardt T. Vergleich von Dysphania mit Chenopodium und mit Illecebraceae. Bauhinia 1967, 3:327-344.
19. Ellis J.R., Janick J. The chromosomes of Spinacia oleracea. Amer. J. Bot. 1960, 47:210-214.
20. Ellison N.W., Liston A., Steiner J.J., Williams W.M., Tayler N.L. Molecular phylogenetics of the clover genus (Trifolium-Leguminoseae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 39:688-705.
21. Farris J.S., Källersjö M., Kluge A.G., Bult C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 1994, 10:315-319.
22. Flores Olvera H., Davis J.I. A cladistic analysis of Atripliceae (Chenopodiaceae) based on morphological data. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 2001, 128:297-319.
23. Flores Olvera H., Fuentes-Soriano S., Hernández E.M. Pollen morphology and systematics of Atripliceae (Chenopodiaceae). Grana 2006, 45:175-194.
24. Guggisberg A., Mansion G., Conti E. Disentangling reticulate evolution in an Arctic-Alpine polyploid complex. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:55-73.
25. Heklau H., Röser M. Delineation, taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of the genus Krascheninnikovia (Amaranthaceae subtribe Axyridinae). Taxon 2008, 57:563-576.
26. Hidalgo O., Garcia-Jaca N., Garnatje T., Susanna A., Siljak-Yakovlev S. Karyological evolution in Rhaponticum Vaill. (Asteraceae, Cardueae) and related genera. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2007, 153:193-201.
27. Hohmann S., Kadereit J., Kadereit G. Understanding Mediterranean-Californian disjunctions: molecular evidence from Chenopodiaceae-Betoideae. Taxon 2006, 55:67-78.
28. Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:754-755.
29. Iljin M. Chenopodiaceae. Flora SSSR 6 1936, 2-354. Moscow & Leningrad. V.L. Komarov (Ed.).
30. Jacobs S.W.L. Review of leaf anatomy and ultrastructure in the Chenopodiaceae (Caryophyllales). J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 2001, 128:236-253.
31. Judd W.S., Ferguson I.K. The genera Chenopodiaceae in the Southeastern United States. Harv. Pap. Bot. 1999, 4:365-416.
32. Kadereit G., Borsch T., Weising K., Freitag H. Phylogeny of Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2003, 164:959-986.
33. Kadereit G., Mavrodiev E.V., Zacharias E.H., Sukhorukov A.P. Molecular phylogeny of Atripliceae (Chenopodioideae, Chenopodiaceae): implications for systematics, biogeography, flower and fruit evolution, and the origin of C4 photosynthesis. Am. J. Bot. 2010, 97:1664-1687.
34. Kapralov M.V., Akhani H., Voznesenskaya E.V., Edwards G., Franceschi V., Roalson E.H. Phylogenetic relationships in the Salicornioideae/Suaedoideae/Salsoloideae s.l. (Chenopodiaceae) clade and a clarification of the phylogenetic position of Bienertia and Alexandra using multiple DNA sequence data sets. Syst. Bot. 2006, 31:571-585.
35. Kolano B., Siwińska D., Maluszyńska J. Comparative cytogenetic analysis of diploid and hexaploid Chenopodium album agg. Acta Soc. Bot. Polon. 2008, 4:293-298.
36. Kühn U. Chenopodiaceae. The families and genera of vascular plants 1993, vol. 2:253-281. Springer, Hamburg.
37. Löhne C., Borsch T. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the petD group II intron: a case study in basal angiosperms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 22:317-332.
38. Mansion G., Zeltner L., Bretagnolle F. Phylogenetic patterns and polyploid evolution within the Mediterranean genus Centaurium (Gentianaceae-Chironieae). Taxon 2005, 54:931-950.
39. Meyer C.A. Chenopodeae [Chenopodiaceae]. Altaica 1829, vol. 1:370-418. Reimer, Berlin.
40. Moquin-Tandon A. Chenopodearum Monographica Enumerato 1840, Parisiis, Tolosae.
41. Moquin-Tandon, A., 1849. Salsolaceae. In: Candolle, A.P. de (Ed.) Prodromus systematics naturalis, vol. 13. sect 2., Parisiis, pp. 43-230.
42. Morrison D. A framework for phylogenetic sequence alignment. Plant Syst. Evol. 2009, 282:127-149.
43. Mosyakin S.L., Clemants S.E. New infrageneric taxa and combinations in Chenopodium L. (Chenopodiaceae). Novon 1996, 6:398-403.
44. Mosyakin S.L., Clemants S.E. New nomenclatural combinations in Dysphania R. Br. (Chenopodiaceae): taxa occurring in North America. Ukr. Bot. Zhurn. 2002, 59:380-385.
45. Mosyakin S.L., Clemants S.E. Further transfers of glandular-pubescent species from Chenopodium subg. Ambrosida to Dysphania (Chenopodiaceae). J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 2008, 2:425-431.
46. Müller K.F. PRAP-computation of Bremer support for large data sets. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 31:780-782.
47. Müller K.F. SeqState-primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. Appl. Bioinf. 2005, 4:65-69.
48. Müller K.F. The efficiency of different search strategies in estimating parsimony jackknife, bootstrap, and Bremer support. BMC Evol. Biol. 2005, 5:58.
49. Müller K.F., Borsch T. Phylogenetics of Amaranthaceae based on matK/trnK sequence data: evidence from parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian analyses. Ann. Mol. Bot. Gard. 2005, 92:66-102.
50. Müller K.F., Borsch T., Hilu K.W. Phylogenetic utility of rapidly evolving DNA at high taxonomical levels: Contrasting matK, trnT-F, and rbcL in basal angiosperms. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 41:99-117.
51. Müller, J., Müller, K.F., Neinhuis, C., Quandt, D., 2007. PhyDE-Phylogenetic Data Editor. http://www.phyde.de.
52. Murakeözy E., Aïnouche A., Meudec A., Deslandes E., Poupart N. Phylogenetic relationships and genetic diversity of the Salicornieae (Chenopodiaceae) native to the Atlantic coasts of France. Plant Syst. Evol. 2007, 264:217-237.
53. Nieto Feliner G., Rosselló J.A. Better the devil you know? Guidelines for insightful utilization of nrDNA ITS in species-level evolutionary studies in plants. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 44:911-919.
54. Nieto Feliner G., Fuertes Aguilar J., Rosselló J.A. Can extensive reticulation and concerted evolution result in a cladistic structured molecular data set?. Cladistics 2001, 17:301-312.
55. Nixon K.C. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 1999, 15:407-414.
56. Ochoterena H. Homology in coding and non-coding DNA sequences: a parsimony perspective. Plant Syst. Evol. 2009, 282:151-168.
57. Palomino G.H., Segura M.D., Bye R., Mercado P.R. Cytogenetic distinction between Teloxys and Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae). Southwest Nat. 1990, 35:351-353.
58. Pax, F., 1889. Caryophyllaceae. In: Engler, A., Prantl, K. (Eds.), Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 3, Teil 1. Abteilung B. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, pp. 61-94.
59. Pax F. Zur Phylogenie der Caryophyllaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 1927, 61:223-241.
60. Pax F., Hoffmann K. Dysphaniaceae. Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien ed. 2 1934, vol. 16c:272-274. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
61. Posada D., Crandall K. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 1998, 14:817-818.
62. Quandt D., Müller K.F., Stech M., Frahm J.P., Frey W., Hilu K.W., Borsch T. Molecular evolution of the chloroplast trnL-F region in land plants. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 2004, 98:13-37.
63. Rahiminejad M.R., Gornall R.J. Flavonoid evidence for allopolyploidy in the Chenopodium album aggregate (Amaranthaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 2004, 246:77-87.
64. Sánchez del Pino I., Borsch T., Motley T.J. TrnL-F and rpl16 sequence data and dense taxon sampling reveal monophyly of unilocular anthered Gomphrenoideae (Amaranthaceae) and an improved picture of their internal relationships. Syst. Bot. 2009, 34:57-67.
65. Sanderson M.J., Wojciechowski M.F., Hu J.M., Khan T.S., Brady S.G. Error, bias, and long-branch attraction in data for two chloroplast photosystem genes in seed plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000, 17:782-797.
66. Schäferhoff B., Müller K.F., Borsch T. Caryophyllales phylogenetics: disentangling Phytolaccaceae and Molluginacea and description of Microteaceae as a new isolated family. Willdenowia 2009, 39:209-228.
67. Schneeweiss G.M., Palomeque T., Colwell A.E., Weiss-Schneeweiss H. Chromosome numbers and karyotype evolution in holoparasitic Orobanche (Orobanchaceae) and related genera. Am. J. Bot. 2004, 91:439-448.
68. Scott A.J. A review of the classification of Chenopodium L. And related genera (Chenopodiaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 1978, 100:205-220.
69. Scott A.J. Rhagodiinae: a new subtribe in the Chenopodiaceae. Feddes Repert. 1978, 89:1-12.
70. Simmons M.P., Ochoterena H. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 2000, 49:369-381.
71. Swofford, D.L., 1998. PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
72. Taberlet P., Gielly L., Pautou G., Bouvet J. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 1991, 17:1105-1109.
73. Turner B.L. Chromosome numbers and their phyletic interpretation. Caryophyllales evolution and systematics 1994, 27-43. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. H.D. Behnke, T.J. Mabry (Eds.).
74. Ulbrich, E., 1934. Chenopodiaceae. In: Engler, A., Prantl, K. (Eds.) Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 2, band 16c. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, pp. 379-584.
75. Uotila P. Chromosome counts on Chenopodium L. SE Europe and SW Asia. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 1973, 10:337-340.
76. Uotila P. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae) for Flora Nordica. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 2001, 38:95-97.
77. Van der Niet T., Linder H.P. Dealing with incongruence in the quest for the species tree: a case study from the orchid genus Satyrium. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 47:154-174.
78. Weber W.A. The genus Teloxys (Chenopodiaceae). Phytologia 1985, 58:477-478.
79. Welsh L.S., Crompton W.C., Clemants S.E. Chenopodiaceae. Flora of North America: Magnoliophyta: Caryophyllidae Part 1, vol. 4 2003, 258-404. Oxford University Press, New York.
80. Wendel J.F., Doyle J.J. Phylogenetic incongruence. Window into genome history and molecular evolution. Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing 1998, 265-296. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London. D.E. Soltis, P.S. Soltis, J.J. Doyle (Eds.).
81. White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S., Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications 1990, 315-322. Academic Press, San Diego. M.A. Innis, D.H. Gelfand, J.J. Shinsky, T.J. White (Eds.).
82. Wiersema J.H., León B. World economic plants: a standard reference 1999, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
83. Wilson P.G. A taxonomic revision of the tribe Chenopodieae (Chenopodiaceae) in Australia. Nutsya 1983, 4:135-162.
84. Wilson H.D. Quinoa biosystematics I: domesticated populations. Econ. Bot. 1988, 42:461-477.
85. Wilson H.D., Heiser C.B. The origin and evolutionary relationships of 'Huauzontle' (Chenopodium nuttalliae Safford), domesticated Chenopod of Mexico. Am. J. Bot. 1979, 66:198-206.
86. Wilson H.D., Manhart J. Crop/weed gene flow: Chenopodium quinoa Willd. And C. berlandieri Moq. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1993, 86:642-648.
87. Worberg A., Quandt D., Barniske A.M., Löhne C., Hilu K.W., Borsch T. Phylogeny of basal eudicots: insights from non-coding and rapidly evolving DNA. Org. Divers. Evol. 2007, 7:55-77.
88. Zacharias E.H., Baldwin B.H. A molecular phylogeny of North American Atripliceae (Chenopodiaceae), with implications for floral and photosynthetic pathway evolution. Syst. Bot. 2010, 35:839-857.
89. Zhu G., Mosyakin S.L., Clemants S.E. Chenopodiaceae. Flora of China 2003, vol. 5:351-414. Science Press and Missouri Botanical garden Press, New York.