Effects of academic experience and prestige on researchers' citing behavior

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 64-71

  Frandsen, Tove Faber ^a   Nicolaisen, Jeppe ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b ROYAL SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINEAR REGRESSION MODELS; TIME-PERIODS;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 83655167196     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21666     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baumol, W.J., (1995). What's different about European economics ? Kyklos, 48 (2), 187-192.
2. Bazerman, C., (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Bollen, J., Rodriguez, M.A., &, Van de Sompel, H., (2006). Journal status. Scientometrics, 69 (3), 669-687.
4. Bollen, J., &, Van de Sompel, H., (2008). Usage impact factor: The effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (1), 136-149.
5. Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., &, Chute, R., (2009). A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS ONE, 4 (6), e6022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006022; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0006022
6. Costas, R., &, Bordons, M., (2011). Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective. Scientometrics, 88 (1), 145-161.
7. Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T.N., &, Bordons, M., (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (8), 1564-1581.
8. Cronin, B., &, Meho, L.I., (2007). Timelines of creativity: A study of intellectual innovators in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (13), 1948-1959.
9. Davis, P. M., (2008). Eigenfactor: Does the principle of repeated improvement result in better estimates than raw citation counts ? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (13), 2186-2188.
10. Ding, Y., &, Cronin, B., (2011). Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem. Information Processing & Management, 47 (1), 80-96.
11. Feist, G.J., (2006). The development of scientific talent in Westinghouse Finalists and members of the National Academy of Sciences. Journal of Adult Development, 13, 23-35.
12. Fourcade, M., (2006). The construction of a global profession: The transnationalization of economics. American Journal of Sociology, 111 (1), 145-194.
13. Franceschet, M., (2010). The difference between popularity and prestige in the sciences and in the social sciences: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Informatics, 4 (1), 55-63.
14. Gingras, Y., Lariviére, V., Macaluso, B., &, Robitaille, J.-P., (2008). The effects of aging on researchers' publication and citation patterns. PLoS ONE, 3, e4048.
15. Hyland, K., (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.
16. Jones, B.F., (2010). Age and great invention. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92 (1), 1-14.
17. Joy, S., (2006). What should I be doing, and where are they doing it? Scholarly productivity of academic psychologists. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 346-364.
18. Kyvik, S., &, Olsen, T.B., (2008). Does the aging of tenured academic staff affect the research performance of universities ? Scientometrics, 76 (3), 439-455.
19. Lehman, H.C., (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Levin, S.G., &, Stephan, P.E., (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. American Economic Review, 81 (1), 114-132.
21. Lewison, G., (2009). The percentage of reviews in research output: A simple measure of research esteem. Research Evaluation, 18 (1), 25-37.
22. Leydesdorff, L., (2009). How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox ? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (7), 1327-1336.
23. Lissoni, F., Mairesse, J., Montobbioy, F., &, Pezzoni, M., (2011). Scientific productivity and academic promotion: A study on French and Italian physicists. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20 (1), 253-294.
24. McCain, K.W., (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (4), 290-296.
25. Nicolaisen, J., (2002). The scholarliness of published peer reviews: A bibliometric study of book reviews in selected social science fields. Research Evaluation, 11 (3), 129-140.
26. Nicolaisen, J., (2007). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 609-641.
27. Nicolaisen, J., &, Frandsen, T.F., (2007). The handicap principle: A new perspective for library and information science research. Information Research, 12 (4), Paper colis23. Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/ colis/colis23.html
28. Over, R., (1988). Does scholarly impact decline with age ? Scientometrics, 13 (5-6), 215-223.
29. Price, D.J.S., (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience. In, C.E. Nelson, &, D.K. Pollock, (Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers (pp. 3-22). Lexington, MA: Heath.
30. Stephan, P.E., &, Levin, S.G., (1992). Striking the mother lode in science: The importance of age, place and time. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
31. Stephan, P.E., &, Levin, S.G., (1993). Age and the Nobel Prize revisited. Scientometrics, 28, 387-399.
32. Stroebe, W., (2010). The graying of academia: Will it reduce scientific productivity ? American Psychologist, 65 (7), 660-673.
33. Tenopir, C., King, D.W., Spencer, J., &, Wu, L., (2009). Variations in article seeking and reading patterns of academics: What makes a difference ? Library & Information Science Research, 31, 139-148.
34. White, H.D., (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (2), 87-108.
35. Wooldridge, J.M., (2009). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (4th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
36. Xie, Y., &, Shauman, K.A., (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63 (6), 847-870.
37. Yan, E., &, Ding, Y., (2010). Weighted citation: An indicator of an article's prestige. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (8), 1635-1643.
38. Zuckerman, H., (1977). The scientific elite. New York, NY: Free Press.