Research methods for analysing world wide web sustainability communication

Social and Environmental Accountability Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 26-36

  Lodhia, Sumit K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Content; Longitudinal; Media richness framework; Research methods; Sustainability communication; Web

Indexed keywords

EID: 83655162349     PISSN: 0969160X     EISSN: 21562245     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2010.9651819     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ACCA. 2001. Environmental, Social and Sustainability Reporting on the World Wide Web: A guide to best practice, London: The Certified Accountants Educational Trust.
2. Adams, C., 2004. ‘The Ethical, Social and Environmental Reporting–Performance Portrayal Gap’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 17(5): 731–757.
3. Adams, C.A., and Frost, G.R., 2004. The Development of the Corporate Website and Implications for Ethical, Social and Environmental Reporting through these Media, Edinburgh: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
4. Andrew, J., 2003. ‘Corporate Governance, the Environment, and the Internet’. Electronic Green Journal,: 19 available at: http://egj.lib.uidaho.edu/egj19/andrew1.html accessed January 26th, 2004
5. Ashbaugh, H., Johnstone, K.M., and Warfield, T.D., 1999. ‘Corporate Reporting on the Internet’. Accounting Horizons, 13(3): 241–257.
6. Buhr, N., 1998. ‘Environmental Performance, Legislation and Annual Report Disclosure: The case of acid rain and Falconbridge’. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 11(2): 163–190.
7. Campbell, D. J., 2000. ‘Legitimacy Theory or Managerial Reality Construction: Corporate social disclosure in Marks and Spencer corporate reports, 1969–1997’. Accounting Forum, 24(1): 80–100.
8. Campbell, D. J., 2003. ‘Intra– and Intersectoral Effects in Environmental Disclosures: Evidence for legitimacy theory?’. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(6): 357–371.
9. Campbell, D.J., 2004. ‘A Longitudinal and Cross–Sectional Analysis of Environmental Disclosure in UK Companies–A research note’. British Accounting Review, 36(1): 107–117.
10. Campbell, D.J., and Beck, A.C., 2004. ‘Answering Allegations: The use of the corporate website for issue–specific reputation management’. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(2/3): 100–116.
11. Campbell, D.J., Craven, B.M., and Shrives, P., 2003. ‘Voluntary Social Reporting in Three FTSE sectors: A comment on perception and legitimacy’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16(4): 558–581.
12. Cho, C.H., 2009. ‘Legitimation Strategies Used in Response to Environmental Disaster: A French case study of Total SA's Erika and AZF incidents’. European Accounting Review, 18(1): 33–62.
13. Cooper, S.M., 2003. ‘Stakeholder Communication and the Internet in UK electricity Companies’. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(3): 232–243.
14. Coupland, C. 2005. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility as Arguments on the Web’. Journal of Business Ethics, 62: 355–366.
15. Coupland, C. 2006. ‘Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility in Web Based Reports: Currency in the banking sector’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17(7): 865–881.
16. Craven, B.M., and Marston, C.L., 1999. ‘Financial Reporting on the Internet by Leading UK Companies’. European Accounting Review, 8(2): 321–333.
17. Craven, B.M., and Otsmani, B., ‘Social and Environmental Reporting on the Internet by Leading UK Companies’. Paper presented at the European Accounting Association (EAA) Annual Conference. Birmingham.
18. Cormier, D., and Magnan, M., 2003. ‘The Impact of the Web on Information and Communication Modes: The case of corporate environmental disclosure’. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(4): 393–416.
19. Cormier, D, Ledoux, M.J, and Magnan, M. 2009. ‘The Use of Websites as a Disclosure Platform for Corporate Performance’. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 10(1): 1–24.
20. Daft, R., and Lengel, R., 1984. ‘Information Richness: A new approach to managerial behaviour and organization design’. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 6: 191–233.
21. Daft, R., and Lengel, R., 1986. ‘Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design’. Management Science, 32(5): 554–571.
22. Debreceny, R, and Gray, G.L. 1999. ‘Financial Reporting on the Internet and the External Audit’. The European Accounting Review, 8(2): 335–350.
23. Deegan, C., 2002. ‘Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation’. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 15(3): 282–311.
24. Deegan, C., 2007. “ ‘Organizational Legitimacy as a Motive for Sustainability Reporting’ ”. In Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, Edited by: Unerman, J, Bebbington, J, and O'Dwyer, B. 127–149. London: Routledge.
25. Deegan, C., and Gordon, B., 1996. ‘A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Corporations’. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3): 187–199.
26. Deegan, C., Rankin, M., and Tobin, J., 2002. ‘An Examination of the Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997: A test of legitimacy theory’. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 15(3): 312–343.
27. Deller, D, Stubenrath, M, and Weber, C. 1999. ‘A Survey on the Use of the Internet for Investor Relations in the USA, the UK and Germany’. European Accounting Review, 8(2): 51–64.
28. Ettredge, M., Richardson, V.J., and Scholz, S., 2001. ‘The Presentation of Financial Information at Corporate Websites’. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2: 149–168.
29. De Vaus, D., 2001. Research Design in Social Science, London: Sage Publications.
30. Gallhofer, S., Haslam, J., Monk, E., and Roberts, C., 2006. ‘The Emancipatory Potential of Online Reporting: The case of counter accounting’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(5): 681–718.
31. Gowthorpe, C, and Amat, O. 1999. ‘External Reporting of Accounting and Financial Information via the Internet in Spain’. European Accounting Review, 8(2): 65–371.
32. Gray, R.H., and Bebbington, J., 2001. Accounting for the Environment, 2nd Ed., London: Sage Publications.
33. Gray, R.H., Bebbington, J, and Walters, D., 1993. Accounting for the Environment: The greening of accountancy Part II, London: Paul Chapman.
34. Gray, R.H., Kouhy, R., and Lavers, S., 1995a. ‘Corporate Social and Environment Reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK Disclosure’. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 8(2): 47–77.
35. Gray, R.H., Kouhy, R., and Lavers, S., 1995b. ‘Constructing a Research Database of Social and Environmental Reporting by UK companies: A methodological note’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2): 78–101.
36. Guthrie, J., and Parker, L.D., 1989. ‘Corporate Social Reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory’. Accounting and Business Research, 19(76): 343–352.
37. Hedlin, P. 1999. ‘The Internet as a Vehicle for Investor Relations: The Swedish case’. European Accounting Review, 8(2): 373–381.
38. Humphrey, C, and Lee, B., eds. 2004. The Real Life Guide to Accounting Research: A Behind–the–Scenes View of Using Qualitative Research Methods, United Kingdom: Elsevier Ltd.
39. Jones, K., Alabaster, T., and Hetherington, K., 1999. ‘Internet–based Environmental Reporting: Current trends’. Greener Management International, 26: 69–90.
40. Lymer, A.M., 1999. ‘The Internet and the Future of Corporate Reporting in Europe’. The European Accounting Review, 8(2): 289–301.
41. Lymer, A., Debreceny, R., Gray, G.L., and Rahman, A., 1999. Business Reporting on the Internet, United Kingdom: International Accounting Standards Committee.
42. Milne, M., and Adler, R., 1999. ‘Exploring the Reliability of Social and Environmental Disclosures Content Analysis’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 12(2): 237–256.
43. O'Dwyer, B., Unerman, J., and Hession, E., 2005a. ‘User Needs in Sustainability Accounting: Perspectives of stakeholders in Ireland’. European Accounting Review, 14(4): 759–787.
44. O'Dwyer, B, Unerman, J., and Bradley, J., 2005b. ‘Perceptions on the Emergence and Future Development of Corporate Social Disclosure in Ireland: Engaging the voices of non–governmental organisations’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(1): 14–43.
45. Owen, D.L., 1991. Green Reporting: The challenge of the nineties, London: Chapman and Hall.
46. Owen, D.L, Gray, R.H, and Maunders, K. 1987. ‘Researching the Information Content of Social Responsibility Disclosure: A comment’. British Accounting Review, 19(2): 169–176.
47. Owen, D.L, Gray, R.H, and Bebbington, J. 1997. ‘Green Accounting: Cosmetic irrelevance or radical agenda for change?’. Asia–Pacific Journal of Accounting, 4(2): 175–198.
48. Patten, D.M., 2002. ‘Give or Take on the Internet: An examination of the disclosure practices of insurance firm web innovators’. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3): 247–259.
49. Patten, D., and Crampton, W., 2004. ‘Legitimacy and the Internet: An examination of corporate web page environmental disclosures’. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 2: 31–57.
50. Pirchegger, B, and Wagenhofer, A. 1999. ‘Financial Information on the Internet: A survey of the homepages of Austrian companies’. European Accounting Review, 8(2): 383–395.
51. Rikhardsson, P., Anderson, A., and Bang, H., 2002. ‘Sustainability Reporting on the Internet: A study of the Global Fortune 500’. Greener Management International, 40: 57–75.
52. Sangster, A., and Tyrrall, D. E., 2004. “ ‘Insight from Internet Based Research: Realizing a qualitative understanding from a quantitative research process’ ”. In The Real Life Guide to Accounting Research: A Behind–the–Scenes View of Using Qualitative Research Methods, Edited by: Humphrey, C., and Lee, B., United Kingdom: Elsevier Ltd.
53. Savage, A., Cataldo, A.J., and Rowlands, J., 2002. ‘A Multi–case Investigation of Environmental Legitimation in Annual Reports’. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 1: 45–81.
54. Sproull, R., 1991. “ ‘A Lesson in Electronic Mail’ ”. In Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, Edited by: Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S., 177–184. MIT Press.
55. Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S., eds. Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, MIT Press.
56. SustainAbility/UNEP. 1999. The Internet Reporting Report, Engaging Stakeholder Series SustainAbility/UNEP.
57. SustainAbility/UNEP. 2001. Virtual Sustainability, Engaging Stakeholder Series SustainAbility/UNEP.
58. Unerman, J., 2000. ‘Methodological Issues: Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13(5): 667–680.
59. Unerman, J., and Bennett, M., 2004. ‘Increased Stakeholder Dialogue and the Internet: Towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony?’. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(7): 685–707.
60. Unerman, J, Bebbington, J, and O'Dwyer, B, eds. 2007. Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, London: Routledge.
61. Valacich, J., Paranka, D., and Nunamaker, J., 1993. ‘Communication Concurrency and the New Media’. Communication Research, 20(2): 249–276.
62. Williams, S.M., and Pei, C.H.W., 1999. ‘Corporate Social Disclosure by Listed Companies on their Web Sites: An international comparison’. International Journal of Accounting, 34(3): 389–419.