Stakeholder communication and the Internet in UK electricity companies

Managerial Auditing Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 232-243

  Cooper, Stuart Martin ^a  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accountability; Electricity industry; Information management; Internet; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986014905     PISSN: 02686902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02686900310469925     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Clarkson, M.E. (1995), “A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 92-117.
2. Coates, J.B., Davies, M.L., Davis, E.W., Zafar, A. and Zwirlein, T. (1995), Adopting Performance Measures that Count: Changing to a Shareholder Value Focus, Aston Business School Research Paper No. RP9510.
3. Cooper, S., Crowther, D. Davies, M. and Davis, E.W. (2001), Shareholder or Stakeholder Value: The Development of Indicators for the Control and Performance of Performance, CIMA, London.
4. Department of Trade and Industry (2000), Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2000, Department of Trade and Industry, The Stationery Office, London.
5. Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995), “The stakeholder theory of the corporations: concepts, evidence and implications”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 1.
6. Foster, C. (1994), “Rival explanations of public ownership, its failure and privatization”, Public Administration, Vol. 72, Winter, pp. 489-503.
7. Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pittman, Boston, MA.
8. Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
9. Gray, R., Bebbington, J. and Walters, D. (1993), Accounting for the Environment, Paul Chapman, London.
10. Gray, R., Owen, D. and Adams, C. (1996), Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting, Prentice Hall, London.
11. Hutton, W. (1995), The State We’re In, Jonathon Cape, London.
12. Lindblom, C.K. (1994), “The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure”, paper presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York, NY.
13. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J. (1997), “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who really counts”, The Academy of Management Review, October, pp. 853-886.
14. Preston, L.E. and Sapienza, H.J. (1990), “Stakeholder management and corporate performance”, Journal of Behavioral Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 361-375.
15. Rappaport, A. (1992), “CFO’s and strategists: forging a common framework”, Harvard Business Review, May/June, pp. 84-91.
16. Sternberg, E. (1997), “The defects of stakeholder theory”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 3-10.
17. Sternberg, E. (1998), Corporate Governance: Accountability in the Marketplace, The Institute if Economic Affairs, London.
18. Stewart, G.B. (1991), The Quest for Value: A Guide for Senior Managers, Harper Collins, New York, NY.
19. Veljanovski, C. (1991), “The regulation game”, in Ed. Veljanovski, C. (Ed.), Regulators and The Market: An Assessment of the Growth of Regulation in the UK, The Institute of Economic Affairs, London.
20. Vickers, J. and Yarrow, G. (1988), Privatisation: An Economic Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Wheeler, D. and Sillanpaa, M. (1997), The Stakeholder Corporation: A Blueprint for Maximising Stakeholder Value, Pitman publishing, London.