Similarity metrics for surgical process models

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 15-27

  Neumuth, Thomas ^a   Loebe, Frank ^a   Jannin, Pierre ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b INRIA   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

Author keywords

Decision making, computer assisted; Medical Informatics; Surgery, computer assisted; Surgical process model; Weights and measures; Workflow

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DATA; CLINICAL USE; COMPLEX TASK; DATA SETS; DECISION MAKING , COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LEARNING CURVES; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ENGINEERING; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PROCESS MODEL; SENSOR SYSTEMS; SIMILARITY METRICS; SIMULATED DATASETS; SOLID BASE; SUPRATENTORIAL TUMORS; SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS; TECHNICAL SYSTEMS; WORKFLOW;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; INFORMATION SCIENCE; MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; UNITS OF MEASUREMENT;

TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

ARTICLE; BIBLIOMETRICS; BRAIN TUMOR; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL STUDY; CRANIOTOMY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ENGINEERING; GRANULATION; HUMAN; LEARNING CURVE; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SIMILARITY METRIC; SIMULATION; SUPPORT GROUP; SURGICAL PROCESS MODEL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORY VALIDATION;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; WORKFLOW;

EID: 83555179140     PISSN: 09333657     EISSN: 18732860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Neumuth T., Jannin P., Schlomberg J., Meixensberger J., Wiedemann P., Burgert O. Analysis of surgical intervention populations using generic surgical process models. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2011, 6:59-71.
2. den Boer K., Straatsburg I., Schellinger A., de Wit L., Dankelman J., Gouma D. Quantitative analysis of the functionality and efficiency of three surgical dissection techniques: a time-motion analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn 1999, 9:389-395.
3. Neumuth T., Krauss A., Meixensberger J., Muensterer O. Impact quantification of the daVinci telemanipulator system on surgical workflow using resource impact profiles. Int J Med Robot 2011, 7:156-164.
4. Riffaud L., Neumuth T., Morandi X., Trantakis C., Meixensberger J., Burgert O., et al. Recording of surgical processes: a study comparing senior and junior neurosurgeons during lumbar disc herniation surgery. Neurosurgery 2010, 67:325-332.
5. Neumuth T., Trantakis C., Riffaud L., Strauss G., Meixensberger J., Burgert O. Assessment of technical needs for surgical equipment by Surgical Process Models. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2009, 18:841-849.
6. Neumuth T., Jannin P., Strauss G., Meixensberger J., Burgert O. Validation of knowledge acquisition for surgical process models. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009, 16:72-80.
7. Neumuth T., Kaschek B., Goldstein D., Ceschia M., Meixensberger J., Strauss G., et al. An observation support system with an adaptive ontology-driven user interface for the modeling of complex behaviors during surgical interventions. Behav Res Meth 2010, 42:1049-1058.
8. AHRQ-Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Rockville, MD; 2010.
9. AWMF-Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e.V., Science-based Guidelines for Diagnostics and Therapy issued by the Scientific Medical Socities in Germany, Düsseldorf; 2010.
10. MacKenzie C., Ibbotson A., Cao C., Lomax A. Hierarchical decomposition of laparoscopic surgery: a human factors approach to investigating the operating room environment. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2001, 10:121-128.
11. Cao C., MacKenzie C., Payandeh S. Task and motion analysis in endoscopic surgery. ASME dynamic systems and controls division (5th annual symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environments and teleoperation systems) 1996, 583-590. ACM Press, Atlanta. D. Kanai (Ed.).
12. Jannin P., Raimbault M., Morandi X., Riffaud L., Gibaud B. Model of surgical procedures for multimodal image-guided neurosurgery. Comput Aided Surg 2003, 8:98-106.
13. Raimbault M., Morandi X., Jannin P. Towards models of surgical procedures: analyzing a database of neurosurgical cases. PACS and imaging informatics 2005, SPIE, Bellingham, p. 97-104.
14. Jannin P., Morandi X. Surgical models for computer-assisted neurosurgery. NeuroImage 2007, 37:783-791.
15. Sudra G., Speidel S., Müller-Stich B., Becker A., Ott M., Dillmann R. Situation modelling and situation recognition for a context-aware augmented reality system. Int J Comp Assist Radiol Surg 2007, 2:434-436.
16. Padoy N., Horn M., Feussner H., Berger M., Navab N. Recovery of surgical workflow: a model-based approach. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2007, 2:481-482.
17. den Boer K., Bruijn M., Jaspers J., Stassen L., Erp W., Jansen A., et al. Time-action analysis of instrument positioners in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2002, 16:142-147.
18. den Boer K., Dankelman J., Gouma D., Stassen H. Peroperative analysis of the surgical procedure. Surg Endosc 2002, 16:492-499.
19. Sjoerdsma W., Meijer D., Jansen A., den Boer K., Grimbergen C. Comparison of efficiencies of three techniques for colon surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn 2000, 10:47-53.
20. Minekus J., Rozing P., Valstar E., Dankelman J. Evaluation of humeral head replacements using time-action analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003, 12:152-157.
21. Combi C., Gozzi M., Oliboni B., Juarez J., Marin R. Temporal similarity measures for querying clinical workflows. Artif Intell Med 2009, 46:37-54.
22. Bae J., Caverlee J., Liu L., Yan H. Process mining by measuring process block similarity. Business process management workshops 2006, 141-152. Springer, Berlin. J. Eder, S. Dustdar (Eds.).
23. Bae J., Caverlee J., Liu L., Rouse W. Process mining, discovery, and integration using distance measures. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on web services (ICWS'06) 2006, p. 479-488. IEEE (Ed.).
24. Bae J., Liu L., Caverlee J., Zhang L. Development of distance measures for process mining, discovery and integration. Int J Web Services Res 2007, 4:1-17.
25. van Dongen B., Dijkman R., Mendling J. Measuring similarity between business process models. Advanced information systems engineering 2008, 450-464. Springer, Berlin. Z. Bellahsene, M. Leonard (Eds.).
26. van der Aalst W. Business alignment: using process mining as a tool for delta analysis and conformance testing. Requirements Engineering Journal 2005, 10:198-211.
27. van der Aalst W, de Medeiros A, Weijters A. Process Equivalence in the Context of Genetic Mining, BPM Center Report BPM-06-15, BPMcenter.org; 2006.
28. van der Aalst W., de Medeiros A., Weijters A. Process equivalence: comparing two process models based on observed behavior. Business process management 2006, Springer, Berlin, p. 129-144.
29. Rozinat A, de Medeiros A, Gunther C, Weijters A, van der Aalst W. Towards an Evaluation Framework for Process Mining Algorithms, BPM Center Report BPM-07-06, BPMcenter.org; 2007.
30. Jannin P., Krupinski E., Warfield S. Validation in medical image processing. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2006, 25:1405-1409.
31. Neumuth D., Loebe F., Herre H., Neumuth T. Modeling surgical processes: a four-level translational approach. Artif Intell Med 2011, 51:147-161.
32. Workflow Management Coalition, Terminology & Glossary, Document Number WFMC-TC-1011, Winchester, UK; 1999.
33. Jablonski S., Bussler C. Workflow-management: modelling concepts, architecture and implementation 1996, Thompson, London.
34. Cronbach L., Meehl P. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 1955, 52:281-302.
35. Jannin P., Grova C., Maurer C. Model for defining and reporting reference-based validation protocols in medical image processing. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2008, 1:63-73.
36. PostgreSQL Global Development Group, PostgreSQL: The world's most advanced open source database; 2009.
37. SPSS Inc., SPSS 15.0, Chicago; 2009.
38. de Medeiros A., van der Aalst W., Wejiters A. Quantifying process equivalence based on observed behavior. Data Knowl Eng 2008, 64:55-74.
39. Rozinat A., van der Aalst W. Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior. Inform Syst 2008, 33:64-95.
40. Lemke H., Vannier M. The operating room and the need for an IT infrastructure and standards. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2006, 1:117-122.