Impact quantification of the daVinci telemanipulator system on surgical workflow using resource impact profiles

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 156-164

  Neumuth, T ^a   Krauss, A ^b   Meixensberger, J ^a,b   Muensterer, O J ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

Author keywords

Fundoplication; Health care evaluation mechanisms; Process assessment (health care); Robotics; Surgical equipment; Workflow

Indexed keywords

LAPAROSCOPY; MANIPULATORS; ROBOTIC SURGERY;

DAVINCI; FUNDOPLICATION; HEALTH CARE EVALUATION MECHANISM; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROCESS ASSESSMENTS; PROCESS RESOURCES; RIGOROUS ANALYSIS; STRUCTURED ANALYSIS; SURGICAL WORKFLOW; WORK-FLOWS;

SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROCESS TECHNOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESOURCE IMPACT PROFILE; ROBOTICS; STOMACH FUNDOPLICATION; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TELESURGERY; WORKFLOW;

EID: 79956283083     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.383     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Lemke HU, Vannier MW. The operating room and the need for an IT infrastructure and standards. IntJ Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2006; 1(3): 117-121.
2. Cleary K, Kinsella A. OR 2020: the operating room of the future. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005; Oct; 15(5): 495, 497-573.
3. Sandberg WS, Ganous TJ, Steiner C. Setting a research agenda for perioperative systems design. Semin Laparosc Surg 2003; Jun; 10(2): 57-70.
4. Deinhardt M. Manipulators and integrated OR systems-requirements and solutions. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2003; Nov; 12(6): 284-292.
5. Schuster M, Wicha LL, Fiege M, Goetz AE. Utilization rates and turnover times as indicators of OR workflow efficiency. Anaesthesist 2007; Oct; 56(10): 1060-1066.
6. Archer T, Macario A. The drive for operating room efficiency will increase quality of patient care. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006; 19: 171-176.
7. Hartmann J, Jacobi CA, Menenakos C, et al. Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and upside-down stomach using the Da Vinci robotic system. A prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; Mar; 12(3): 504-509.
8. Neumuth T, Durstewitz N, Fischer M, et al. Structured recording of intraoperative surgical workflows. In SPIE Medical Imaging 2006-PACS and Imaging Informatics: Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging. Horii S, Ratib O (eds). Bellingham, WA, p. CID 61450A-, 2006.
9. Neumuth T, Jannin P, Strauss G, et al. Validation of knowledge acquisition for surgical process models. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16(1): 72-80.
10. Neumuth T, Jannin P, Schlomberg J, et al. Analysis of surgical intervention populations using generic surgical process models. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2011; 6(1): 59-71.
11. Thiel DD, Winfield HN. Robotics in urology: past, present, and future. J Endourol 2008; Apr; 22(4): 825-830.
12. Bargar WL. Robots in orthopaedic surgery: past, present, and future. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; Oct; 463: 31-36.
13. Chitwood WR, Kypson AP, Nifong LW. Robotic mitral valve surgery: a technologic and economic revolution for heart centers. Am Heart Hosp J 2003; 1(1): 30-39.
14. Mohr CJ, Nadzam GS, Alami RS, et al. Totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 75 patients. Obes Surg 2006; Jun; 16(6): 690-696.
15. Rodríguez E, Kypson AP, Moten SC, et al. Robotic mitral surgery at East Carolina University: a 6 year experience. Int J Med Robot 2006; Sep; 2(3): 211-215.
16. Bocca S, Stadtmauer L, Oehninger S. Current status of robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in reproductive medicine and gynaecology. Reprod Biomed. Online 2007; Jun; 14(6): 765-772.
17. Trabulsi EJ, Linden RA, Gomella LG, et al. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins. Can J Urol 2008; Apr; 15(2): 3994-3999.
18. Hu JC, Nelson RA, Wilson TG, et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2006; Feb; 175(2): 541-546; discussion 546.
19. Le CQ, Gettman MT. Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2006; Jul; 6(7): 1003-1011.
20. Ploussard G, Xylinas E, Paul A, et al. Is robot assistance affecting operating room time compared with pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? J Endourol 2009; Jun; 23(6): 939-943.
21. Williams TR, Longoria OJ, Asselmeier S, Menon M. Incidence and imaging appearance of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leaks following da Vinci robotic prostatectomy. Abdom Imaging 2008; Jun; 33(3): 367-370.
22. Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ, et al. Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2009; Jun; 23(6): 1204-1211.
23. Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg 2008; Jun; 247(6): 987-993.
24. Wang GJ, Barocas DA, Raman JD, Scherr DS. Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological efficacy. Br J Urol Int 2008; Jan; 101(1): 89-93.
25. Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; Jun; 16(6): 1480-1487.
26. Myer EG, Wagner JR. Robotic assisted laparoscopic bladder diverticulectomy. J Urol 2007; Dec; 178(6): 2406-2410; discussion 2410.
27. Morino M, Benincà G, Giraudo G, et al. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2004; Dec; 18(12): 1742-1746.
28. Nazemi T, Galich A, Sterrett S, et al. Radical nephrectomy performed by open laparoscopy with or without hand-assistance or robotic methods by the same surgeon produces comparable perioperative results. Int Braz J Urol 2006; Feb; 32(1): 15-22.
29. Kaul SA, Menon M. Da Vinci assisted cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion: a paradigm shift in surgical management of bladder cancer. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2007; Jun; 59(2): 149-157.
30. Folliguet T, Vanhuyse F, Constantino X, et al. Mitral valve repair robotic versus sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; Mar; 29(3): 362-366.
31. Bodner J, Kafka-Ritsch R, Lucciarini P, et al. A critical comparison of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic splenectomies. World J Surg 2005; Aug; 29(8): 982-985; discussion 985-986.
32. Yee DS, Shanberg AM, Duel BP, et al. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology 2006; Mar; 67(3): 599-602.
33. Bernie JE, Venkatesh R, Brown J, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without robotic assistance. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2005; Sep; 9(3): 258-261.
34. Link RE, Bhayani SB, Kavoussi LR. A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg 2006; Apr; 243(4): 486-491.
35. Park SY, Jeong W, Choi YD, et al. Yonsei experience in robotic urologic surgery-application in various urological procedures. Yonsei Med J 2008; Dec 31; 49(6): 897-900.
36. Weinstein GS, O'Malley BW, Desai SC, Quon H. Transoral robotic surgery: does the ends justify the means? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; Apr; 17(2): 126-131.
37. Mishra YK, Wasir H, Sharma KK, et al. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2006; Dec; 14(6): 447-451.
38. Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bonaros N, et al. How to improve performance of robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Surg 2008; May; 195(5): 711-716.
39. Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2005; Mar; 9(1): 13-15.
40. Bell MC, Torgerson JL, Kreaden U. The first 100 da Vinci hysterectomies: an analysis of the learning curve for a single surgeon. S D Med 2009; Mar; 62(3): 91, 93-95.
41. Fanning J, Fenton B, Purohit M. Robotic radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; Jun; 198(6): 649.e1-4.
42. Braumann C, Jacobi CA, Menenakos C, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery with the da Vinci system: a 4-year experience in a single institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2008; Jun; 18(3): 260-266.
43. Pitter MC, Anderson P, Blissett A, Pemberton N. Robotic-assisted gynaecological surgery-establishing training criteria; minimizing operative time and blood loss. Int J Med Robot 2008; Jun; 4(2): 114-120.
44. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Lemyre M, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: scientific dream or reality? Fertil Steril 2009; Jun; 91(6): 2620-2622.
45. Hubert J, Siemer S. Nephrectomy, donor nephrectomy, and partial kidney resection: indications for robot-assisted renal surgery. Urologe A 2008; Apr; 47(4): 425-426, 428-430.
46. Sim HG, Yip SKH, Lau WKO, et al. Team-based approach reduces learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2006; May; 13(5): 560-564.
47. Villavicencio Mavrich H, Esquena Fernández S, Salvador Bayarri J, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy: first 100 patients in Fundació Puigvert. Actas Urol Esp 2009; Jan; 33(1): 24-29.
48. Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. Br J Urol Int 2007; May; 99(5): 1109-1112.
49. Artibani W, Fracalanza S, Cavalleri S, et al. Learning curve and preliminary experience with da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 2008; 80(3): 237-244.
50. John H, Schmid DM, Fehr JL. Extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy Da Vinci. Actas Urol Esp 2007; Jun; 31(6): 580-586.
51. Hartmann J, Jacobi CA, Menenakos C, et al. Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and upside-down stomach using the Da Vinci robotic system. A prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; Mar; 12(3): 504-509.
52. Ahmadi S, Sielhorst T, Stauder R, et al. Recovery of surgical workflow without explicit models. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2006; 9(Pt 1): 420-428.
53. James A, Vieira D, Lo B, Darzi A, Yang G. Eye-gaze driven surgical workflow segmentation. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2007; 10(Pt 2): 110-117.
54. Münchenberg JE, Brief J, Raczkowsky J, et al. Operation planning of robot supported surgical interventions. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE Computer Society; 2001; p. 547-552.
55. Mehta N, Haluck R, Frecker M, Snyder A. Sequence and task analysis of instrument use in common laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 2002; Feb; 16(2): 280-285.
56. Casaletto JA, Rajaratnam V. Surgical process re-engineering: carpal tunnel decompression-a model. Hand Surg 2004; Jul; 9(1): 19-27.
57. Malik R, White P, Macewen C. Using human reliability analysis to detect surgical error in endoscopic DCR surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2003; Oct; 28(5): 456-460.
58. den Boer K, Straatsburg I, Schellinger A, et al. Quantitative analysis of the functionality and efficiency of three surgical dissection techniques: a time-motion analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1999; Oct; 9(5): 389-395.
59. Strauss G, Fischer M, Meixensberger J, et al. Workflow analysis to assess the efficiency of intraoperative technology using the example of functional endoscopic sinus surgery. HNO 2006; Jul; 54(7): 528-535.
60. Nissen R. A simple operation for control of reflux esophagitis. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1956; May 18; 86(Suppl 20): 590-592.
61. Nissen R. Gastropexy and 'fundoplication' in surgical treatment of hiatal hernia. Am J Digest Dis 1961; Oct; 6: 954-961.
62. Neumuth T, Trantakis C, Riffaud L, et al. Assessment of technical needs for surgical equipment by surgical process models. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2009; 18(6): 841-849.
63. PostgreSQL Global Development Group. PostgreSQL: The world's most advanced open source database- 2009; [cited 2009 Jul 27]; Available from: .