Form follows function: Morphological diversification and alternative trapping strategies in carnivorous Nepenthes pitcher plants

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 90-102

  Bauer, U ^a   Clemente, C J ^b   Renner, T ^c   Federle, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Carnivorous plants; Comparative analysis; Evolution; Functional morphology; Nepenthes; Peristome aquaplaning; Trapping mechanism; Wax crystals

Indexed keywords

WAX;

CARNIVOROUS PLANT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; PREY CAPTURE; SPECIALIZATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CARNIVORY; CARYOPHYLLACEAE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; BIODIVERSITY; CARNIVORY; CARYOPHYLLACEAE; GENETIC SPECIATION; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHYLOGENY; PLANT COMPONENTS, AERIAL; WAXES;

HEXAPODA; NEPENTHES; SARRACENIACEAE;

EID: 83555178471     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02406.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Amagase, S. 1972. Digestive enzymes in insectivorous plants: III. Acid proteases in the genus Nepenthes and Drosera peltata. J. Biochem.-Tokyo 72: 73-81.
2. Bauer, U. & Federle, W. 2009. The insect-trapping rim of Nepenthes pitchers: surface structure and function. Plant Signal. Behav. 4: 1019-1023.
3. Bauer, U., Bohn, H.F. & Federle, W. 2008. Harmless nectar source or deadly trap: Nepenthes pitchers are activated by rain, condensation and nectar. Proc. R. Soc. B 275: 259-265.
4. Bauer, U., Grafe, T.U. & Federle, W. 2011. Evidence for alternative trapping strategies in two forms of the pitcher plant, Nepenthes rafflesiana. J. Exp. Bot. 62: 3683-3692.
5. Blomberg, S.P., Garland, J.T. & Ives, A.R. 2003. Testing for a phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57: 717-745.
6. Bohn, H.F. & Federle, W. 2004. Insect aquaplaning: Nepenthes pitcher plants capture prey with the peristome, a fully wettable water-lubricated anisotropic surface. PNAS 101: 14138-14143.
7. Bonhomme, V., Pelloux-Prayer, H., Jousselin, E., Forterre, Y., Labat, J.-J. & Gaume, L. 2011. Slippery or sticky? Functional diversity in the trapping strategy of Nepenthes carnivorous plants. New Phytol. 191: 545-554.
8. Cheverud, J.M., Dow, M.M. & Leutenegger, W. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 39: 1335-1351.
9. Chin, L., Moran, J.A. & Clarke, C. 2010. Trap geometry in three giant montane pitcher plant species from Borneo is a function of tree shrew body size. New Phytol. 186: 461-470.
10. Clarke, C. 1997. Nepenthes of Borneo. Natural History Publications, Kota Kinabalu.
11. Clarke, C. 2001. Nepenthes of Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia. Natural History Publications, Kota Kinabalu.
12. Clarke, C.M., Bauer, U., Lee, C.C., Tuen, A.A., Rembold, K. & Moran, J.A. 2009. Tree shrew lavatories: a novel nitrogen sequestration strategy in a tropical pitcher plant. Biol. Lett. 5: 632-635.
13. Collins, N.M. 1980. The distribution of soil macrofauna on the west ridge of Gunung (Mount) Mulu, Sarawak. Oecologia 44: 263-275.
14. Coyne, J.A. & Orr, H.A. 1998. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353: 287-305.
15. Darwin, C. 1859. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life. Murray, London.
16. Garland, T.J. & Ives, A.R. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155: 346-364.
17. Gaume, L. & Di Guisto, B. 2009. Adaptive significance and ontogenetic variability of the waxy zone in Nepenthes rafflesiana. Ann. Bot. 104: 1281-1291.
18. Gaume, L. & Forterre, Y. 2007. A viscoelastic deadly fluid in carnivorous pitcher plants. PLoS ONE 2: e1185.
19. Gaume, L., Gorb, S. & Rowe, N. 2002. Function of epidermal surfaces in the trapping efficiency of Nepenthes alata pitchers. New Phytol. 156: 479-489.
20. Gaume, L., Perret, P., Gorb, E., Gorb, S., Labat, J.-J. & Rowe, N. 2004. How do plant waxes cause flies to slide? Experimental tests of wax-based trapping mechanisms in three pitfall carnivorous plants. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 33: 103-111.
21. Gaut, B.S. 1998. Molecular clocks and nucleotide substitution rates in higher plants. In: Evolutionary Biology (M.K. Hecht, ed.), pp. 93-120. Plenum Press, New York.
22. Gorb, E., Haas, K., Henrich, A., Enders, S., Barbakadze, N. & Gorb, S. 2005. Composite structure of the crystalline epicuticular wax layer of the slippery zone in the pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata and its effect on insect attachment. J. Exp. Biol. 208: 4651-4662.
23. Grafe, T.U., Schöner, C.R., Kerth, G., Junaidi, A. & Schöner, M.G. 2011. A novel resource-service mutualism between bats and pitcher plants. Biol. Lett. 7: 436-439.
24. Greenwood, M., Clarke, C., Lee, C.C., Gunsalam, A. & Clarke, R.H. 2011. A unique resource mutualism between the giant Bornean pitcher plant, Nepenthes rajah, and members of a small mammal community. PLoS ONE 6: e21114.
25. Higgins, D., Thompson, J., Gibson, T., Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680.
26. Juniper, B.E. & Burras, J.K. 1962. How pitcher plants trap insects. New Sci. 13: 75-77.
27. Juniper, B.E., Robins, R.J. & Joel, D.M. 1989. The Carnivorous Plants. Academic Press, London.
28. Koch, K., Hartmann, K.D., Schreiber, L., Barthlott, W. & Neinhuis, C. 2006. Influences of air humidity during the cultivation of plants on wax chemical composition, morphology and leaf surface wettability. Env. Exp. Bot. 56: 1-9.
29. Krutzsch, W. 1985. Über Nepenthes-Pollen im europäischen Tertiär. Gleditschia 13: 89-93.
30. Krutzsch, W. 1989. Paleogeography and historical phytogeography (paleochorology) in the Neophyticum. Plant Syst. Evol. 162: 5-61.
31. Maddison, W.P. 1991. Squared-change parsimony reconstructions of ancestral states for continuous-valued characters on a phylogenetic tree. Syst. Biol. 40: 304-314.
32. Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 2010. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis (version 2.73). Available at:
33. Maynard Smith, J. 1989. Evolutionary Genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
34. McPherson, S. 2009. Pitcher Plants of the Old World. Redfern Natural History, Poole.
35. Meimberg, H. & Heubl, G. 2006. Introduction of a nuclear marker for phylogenetic analysis of Nepenthaceae. Plant Biol. 8: 831-840.
36. Meimberg, H., Wistuba, A., Dittrich, P. & Heubl, G. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of Nepenthaceae based on cladistic analysis of plastid trnK intron sequence data. Plant Biol. 3: 164-175.
37. Merbach, M.A., Merbach, D.J., Maschwitz, U., Booth, W.E., Fiala, B. & Zizka, G. 2002. Mass march of termites into the deadly trap. Nature 415: 36-37.
38. Moran, J.A. 1996. Pitcher dimorphism, prey composition and the mechanisms of prey attraction in the pitcher plant Nepenthes rafflesiana in Borneo. J. Ecol. 84: 515-525.
39. Moran, J.A., Booth, W.E. & Charles, J.K. 1999. Aspects of pitcher morphology and spectral characteristics of six Bornean Nepenthes pitcher plant species: implications for prey capture. Ann. Bot. 83: 521-528.
40. Moran, J.A., Merbach, M.A., Livingston, N.J., Clarke, C.M. & Booth, W.E. 2001. Termite prey specialization in the pitcher plant Nepenthes albomarginata- evidence from stable isotope analysis. Ann. Bot. 88: 307-311.
41. Moran, J.A., Clarke, C.M. & Hawkins, B.J. 2003. From carnivore to detritivore? Isotopic evidence for leaf litter utilization by the tropical pitcher plant Nepenthes ampullaria. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164: 635-639.
42. Phillipps, A., Lamb, A. & Lee, C.C. 2008. Pitcher Plants of Borneo, 2nd edn. Natural History Publications, Kota Kinabalu.
43. Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
44. Samson, D.A., Rickart, E.A. & Gonzales, P.C. 1997. Ant diversity and abundance along an elevational gradient in the Philippines. Biotropica 29: 349-363.
45. Scholz, I., Buckins, M., Dolge, L., Erlinghagen, T., Weth, A., Hischen, F. et al. 2010. Slippery surfaces of pitcher plants: Nepenthes wax crystals minimize insect attachment via microscopic surface roughness. J. Exp. Biol. 213: 1115-1125.
46. Swofford, D.L. 2000. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
47. Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28: 2731-2739.
48. Tan, H.T.W. 1997. Prey. In: A Guide to the Carnivorous Plants of Singapore (H.T.W. Tan, ed.), pp. 125-131. Singapore Science Centre, Singapore.
49. Wainwright, P.C. & Reilly, S.M. (ed.) 1994. Ecological Morphology: Integrative Organismal Biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London.