Accuracy and Precision of Two Computer-Assisted Methods of Radiographic Wear Measurement in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 37-40

  Crockarell, John R ^a   Snearly, Christine M ^b  

^a Campbell Clinic Memphis   (United States)

^b InMotion Orthopaedic Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Hip analysis suite; Roentgen monographic analysis tool; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; ERROR; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHANTOM; SKELETON RADIOGRAPHY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; X RAY FILM;

HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 83555174526     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Hopper R.H., Young A.M., Engh C.A., et al. Assessing the pattern of femoral head penetration after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004, 7(suppl 2):22.
2. Wilkinson J.M., Harner A.J., Stockley I., et al. Polyethylene wear rate and osteolysis: critical threshold versus continuous dose-response relationship. J Orthop Res 2005, 23:520.
3. Bragdon C.R., Martell J.M., Estok D.M., et al. A new approach for the Martell 3-D method of measuring polyethylene wear without requiring the cross-table lateral films. J Orthop Res 2005, 23:720.
4. Martell J.M., Berkson E., Berger R., et al. Comparison of two and three-dimensional computerized polyethylene wear analysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003, 85-A:1111.
5. Hui A.J., McCalden R.W., Martell J.M., et al. Validation of two and three-dimensional radiographic techniques for measuring polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003, 85-A:505.
6. Martell J.M., Berdia S. Determination of polyethylene wear in total hip replacements with use of digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997, 79-A:1635.
7. Geerdink C.H., Grimm B., Vencken W., et al. The determination of linear and angular penetration of the femoral head into the acetabular component as an assessment of wear in total hip replacement: a comparison of four computer-assisted methods. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008, 90-B:839.
8. ASTM E177-08 Standard practice for use of the terms precision and bias in ASTM test methods 2008, ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), ASTM International, West Conshohocken (Pa).
9. Mann H.B., Whitney D.R. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat 1947, 18:50.
10. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 8476:307.
11. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Measurement error. BMJ 1996, 313:744.
12. Ebramzadeh E., Sangiorgio S.N., Lattuada F., et al. Accuracy of measurement of polyethylene wear with use of radiographs of total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003, 85-A:2378.
13. Bragdon C.R., Martell J.M., Greene M.E., et al. Comparison of femoral head penetration using RSA and the Martell method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 448:52.