Percutaneous coronary intervention at centers with and without on-site surgery: A meta-analysis

JAMA

Volumn 306, Issue 22, 2011, Pages 2487-2494

  Singh, Mandeep ^a   Holmes, David R ^a   Dehmer, Gregory J ^b   Lennon, Ryan J ^a   Wharton, Thomas P ^c   Kutcher, Michael A ^d   Aversano, Thomas ^e   Rihal, Charanjit S ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b SCOTT AND WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c Exeter Hospital   (United States)

^d WAKE FOREST BAPTIST HEALTH   (United States)

^e JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EMERGENCY SURGERY; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; ON SITE SURGERY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 83455259876     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Summary Article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI writing committee to update the 2001 guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(1):216-235. (Pubitemid 43005194)
2. Seshadri N, Whitlow PL, Acharya N, Houghtaling P, Blackstone EH, Ellis SG. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era. Circulation. 2002;106(18):2346-2350. (Pubitemid 35244736)
3. Yang EH, Gumina RJ, Lennon RJ, Holmes DR Jr, Rihal CS, Singh M. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery for percutaneous coronary interventions: changes in the incidence, clinical characteristics, and indications from 1979 to 2003. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(11):2004-2009. (Pubitemid 41713582)
4. Singh M, Gersh BJ, Lennon RJ, et al. Outcomes of a system-wide protocol for elective and nonelective coronary angioplasty at sites without on-site surgery: the Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(6):501-508.
5. Peels HO, de Swart H, Ploeg TV, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with off-site cardiac surgery backup for acute myocardial infarction as a strategy to reduce door-to-balloon time. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100(9):1353-1358. (Pubitemid 47576011)
6. Dellavalle A, Steffenino G, Ribichini F, Russo P, Uslenghi E. Elective coronary angioplasty with and without surgical standby: clinical and angiographic criteria for the selection of patients. Coron Artery Dis. 1995;6(6):513-520.
7. Wennberg DE, Lucas FL, Siewers AE, Kellett MA, Malenka DJ. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without and with onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2004;292(16):1961-1968. (Pubitemid 39411204)
8. Kutcher MA, Klein LW, Ou FS, et al. National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Percutaneous coronary interventions in facilities without cardiac surgery on site: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(1):16-24.
9. Carlsson J, James SN, Ståhle E, Höfer S, Lagerqvist B. Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery standby. Heart. 2007;93(3):335-338. (Pubitemid 46579524)
10. Frutkin AD, Mehta SK, Patel T, et al. Outcomes of 1090 consecutive, elective, nonselected percutaneous coronary interventions at a community hospital without onsite cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101(1):53-57. (Pubitemid 350297199)
11. Hannan EL, Zhong Y, Racz M, et al. Outcomes for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the New York State experience. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(6):519-527.
12. Tebbe U, Hochadel M, Bramlage P, et al. Inhospital outcomes after elective and non-elective percutaneous coronary interventions in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery backup. Clin Res Cardiol. 2009;98(11):701-707.
13. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting: Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008- 2012. (Pubitemid 30214957)
14. Weaver WD, Parsons L, Every N. Primary coronary angioplasty in hospitals with and without surgery backup. MITI project investigators. J Invasive Cardiol. 1995;7(suppl F):34F-39F.
15. Sanborn TA, Jacobs AK, Frederick PD, Every NR, French WJ; National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 3 and 4 Investigators. Comparability of quality-of-care indicators for emergency coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction regardless of on-site cardiac surgery (report from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction). Am J Cardiol. 2004;93(11):1335-1339, A5.
16. Melberg T, Nilsen DW, Larsen AI, et al. Non-emergent coronary angioplasty without on-site surgical backup: a randomized study evaluating outcomes in low-risk patients. Am Heart J. 2006;152(5):888-895. (Pubitemid 44632952)
17. Pride YB, Canto JG, Frederick PD, Gibson CM; NRMI Investigators. Outcomes among patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction presenting to interventional hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(6):574-582.
18. Pride YB, Canto JG, Frederick PD, Gibson CM; NRMI Investigators. Outcomes among patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting to interventional hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(10):944-952.
19. Giuliani G, Bonechi F, Vecchio S, et al. Comparison of primary angioplasty in rural and metropolitan areas within an integrated network. EuroIntervention. 2008;4(3):365-372.
20. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806-808. (Pubitemid 350057266)
21. Anis A, Normand S-LT, Wolf RE, et al. Outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a comparison between hospitals with and without cardiac surgery on-site [abstract]. Circulation. 2009;120:S959.
22. Shiraishi J, Kohno Y, Sawada T, et al. AMI-Kyoto Multi-Center Risk Study Group. In-hospital outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary interventions performed at hospitals with and without onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circ J. 2007;71(8):1208-1212. (Pubitemid 47195334)
23. Peterson ED, Roe MT, Mulgund J, et al. Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2006;295(16):1912-1920.
24. Malenka DJ, McGrath PD, Wennberg DE, et al. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. The relationship between operator volume and outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in high volume hospitals in 1994-1996: the northern New England experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(5):1471-1480. (Pubitemid 29528659)
25. Hannan EL, Racz M, Ryan TJ, et al. Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists. JAMA. 1997;277(11):892-898. (Pubitemid 27123949)
26. Loubeyre C, Morice MC, Berzin B, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery following coronary angioplasty and stenting: results of a French multicenter registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;47(4):441-448. (Pubitemid 29360368)