Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery standby

Heart

Volumn 93, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 335-338

  Carlsson, Jörg ^a,b   James, Stefan N ^c   Ståhle, Elisabeth ^c   Höfer, Sebastian ^b   Lagerqvist, Bo ^c  

^a Lasarettsvägen ^*  (Sweden)

^b Division of Cardiology   (Sweden)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY PERFORATION; CORONARY ARTERY THROMBOSIS; HEART DISEASE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART SURGERY; HOSPITAL CARE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICENTERS; SWEDEN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34147215276     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.098061     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Grüntzig AR. Transluminal dilatation of coronary artery stenosis. Lancet 1978;1:263.
2. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:216-35.
3. Yang EH, Gumina RJ, Lennon RJ, et al. Emergency coronary bypass surgery for percutaneous coronary interventions. Changes in the incidence, clinical characteristics and indications from 1979 to 2003. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:2010-12.
4. Altmann DB, Racz M, Battleman DS, et al. Reduction in angioplasty complications after the introduction of coronary stents: results from a consecutive series of 2242 patients. Am Heart J 1996;132:503-7.
5. Lindsay J, Hong MK, Pinnow EE, et al. Effects of endoluminal coronary stents on the frequency of coronary artery bypass grafting after unsuccessful percutaneous transluminal coronary vascularization. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:647-9.
6. EPILOG Investigators. Platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa blockade with abciximab with low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1689-96.
7. Dawkins KD, Gershlick T, de Belder M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention: recommendations for good practice and training. Heart 2005;91(Suppl VI):vi1-27.
8. Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2005;26:804-47.
9. Ryan TJ. Percutaneous coronary interventions without on-site cardiac surgery: a stretch for much-needed evidence. Am Heart J 2003;145:214-16.
10. Singh M, Ting HH, Berger PB, et al. Rationale for on-site cardiac surgery for primary angioplasty: a time for reappraisal. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1881-9.
11. Shubrooks SJ, Nest RW, Leeman D, et al. Urgent coronary bypass surgery for failed percutaneous coronary intervention in the stent era: is backup still necessary? Am Heart J 2001;142:190-6.
12. Angelini P. Guidelines for surgical standby for coronary angioplasty: should they be changed? J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1266-8.
13. Wennberg DE, Lucas FE, Siewers AE, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without and with onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 2004;292:1961-8.
14. Weaver WD. Is onsite surgery backup necessary for percutaneous coronary interventions? JAMA 2004;292:2014-16.
15. Carlsson J, Schneider S, Senges J, et al. Outcome of PTCA in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery backup [abstract]. Eur Heart J 2005;26(Suppl):346-7.
16. Kutcher MA, Klein LW, Wharton TP. Clinical outcomes in coronary angioplasty centers with off-site versus on-site cardiac surgery capabilities: a preliminary report from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry [abstract]. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93: 96A, Abstract 852-1.
17. Stauffer JC, Eeckhout E, Vogt P, et al. Standby versus stent-by during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1995;130:21-6.
18. Weaver WD. Why we should not do percutaneous coronary intervention at sites without surgical backup. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;65:8-9.
19. Singh M. Primary angioplasty should be performed in hospitals without on-site surgery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;65:1-7.
20. Wharton TP, Sinclair McNamara N, Fedele FA, et al. Primary angioplasty for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: experience at two community hospitals without cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1257-65.
21. Ting HH, Garratt KN, Singh M, et al. Low-risk percutaneous coronary interventions without on-site cardiac surgery: two years' observational experience and follow-up. Am Heart J 2003;145:278-84.
22. Richardson SG, Morton P, Murtagh JG, et al. Management of acute coronary occlusion during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: experience of complications at a hospital without on site facilities for cardiac surgery. BMJ 1990;300:355-8.
23. Turgeman Y, Atar S, Suleiman K, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic percutaneous cardiac intervention without on-site surgical backup - review of 11 years experience. Isr Med Assoc J 2003;5:89-93.
24. Ting HH, Raveendran G, Lennon RJ, et al. A total of 1,007 percutaneous coronary interventions without onsite cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1713-21.
25. Stone GW, Brodie BR, Griffin JJ, et al. Role of cardiac surgery in the hospital phase management of patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:1292-6.
26. Benson J. Trenton to let more clinics perform angioplasty. The New York Times 1 November 2005, http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/01/nyregion/01heart. html (accessed 4 Jan 2007).
27. Kastrati A, Neumann FJ, Schömig A. Operator volume and outcome of patients undergoing coronary stent placement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:970-6.
28. Moscucci M, Share D, Smith D, et al. Relationship between operator volume and adverse outcome in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention practice: an analysis of a quality-controlled multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention clinical database. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:625-32.
29. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease: implications for patient selection. Circulation 1990;82:1193-202.
30. Singh M, Rihal CS, Lennon RJ, et al. Prediction of complications following nonemergency percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:907-12.