Cancer: Escape route from a "doomed" host?

BioEssays

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 2-

  Moore, Andrew ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER CELL; CELL PROLIFERATION; EDITORIAL; EPIGENETICS; GENE MUTATION; GENE REPLICATION; MORTALITY; NEOPLASM; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CELL CYCLE; CELL TRANSFORMATION, NEOPLASTIC; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; INTERCELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; NEOPLASMS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 83455210250     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201190072     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Vincent M. 2012. Cancer: A de-repression of a default survival program common to all cells? BioEssays 34: 72-82.
2. Parr E. 2012. The default state of the cell: Quiescence or proliferation? BioEssays 34: 36-7.
3. Soto AM Sonnenschein C. 2011. The tissue organization field theory of cancer: A testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory. BioEssays 33: 332-40.
4. Kaneko K. 2011. Characterization of stem cells and cancer cells on the basis of gene expression profile stability, plasticity, and robustness. BioEssays 33: 403-13.
5. Gilbert DA. 2011. SMT vs. TOFT. BioEssays 33: 555.
6. Baker SG. 2011. TOFT better explains experimental results in cancer research than SMT. BioEssays 33: 919-21.
7. Satgé D. 2011. On somatic mutations and tissue fields in cancer. BioEssays 33: 922-23.