Social and spatial presence: An application to optimize human-computer interaction

PsychNology Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 85-114

  Horvath, Karl ^a   Lombard, Matthew ^b  

^a Gwynedd Mercy University   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cues; Human computer interaction; Social presence; Spatial presence; Telepresence; Usability; User interface; User interface design

Indexed keywords

EID: 83455193306     PISSN: 17207525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Abkarian, G. G., King, P. R., & Krappes, T. L. (1987). Enhancing interaction in a difficult-to-test child: The PPVT-TV technique. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(5), 268-269.
2. AgentWeb website. (2005). UMBC AgentWeb at the University of Maryland Baltimore County. Retrieved April 17, 2005, from, http://agents.umbc.edu
3. American Disabilities Act. (2004). Retrieved September 14, 2004, from http://ada.gov.
4. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (2006). Retrieved April 2, 2006, from http://www.aaai.org.
5. Bailey, R. (1996). Human Performance Engineering: Designing High Quality Professional User Interfaces for Computer Products, Applications and Systems (3rd Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Biocca, F. (1995, May). Presence. Presentation presented for a workshop on Cognitive Issues in Virtual Reality, VR 95 Conference and Expo, San Jose, CA.
7. Biocca, F., & Delaney, B. (1995). Immersive virtual reality technology. In Frank Biocca & Mark R. Levy (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality. (pp. 57-124) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Blythe, M. A., Monk, A. F., Overbeeke, K., & Wright, P. C. (Editors) (2003). Funology: From usability to enjoyment. Berlin: Kluewer Academic Publishers.
9. Bradshaw, J. (1997). Software Agents. Massachusetts: AAAI Press/The MIT Press.
10. Byrne, M. D. (2001). Applying a Cognitive Architecture to HCI. Retrieved March 2, 2004, from http://chil.rice.edu/byrne/Pubs/byrneIJHCS.pdf
11. Campanella Bracken, C., & Skalski, P. (2009). Immersed in Media: Telepresense in Everyday Life. New York: Routledge Communication Series.
12. Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1995). Research Report: The Importance of Specification in Causal Modeling: The Case of End-user Computing Satisfaction. Information Systems Research, 6(1), 73-81.
13. Chu, G. C., & Schramm, W. (1967). Learning from television: What the research says. Washington D.C.: National Association of Educational Broadcasters.
14. Crump, W. J., & Pfiel, T. (1995). A telemedicine primer: An introduction to the technology and an overview of the literature. Archives of Family Medicine, 4(9), 796-803.
15. Dongier, M., Tempier, R., Lalinec-Michaud, M., & Meunier, D. (1986). Telepsychiatry: Psychiatric consultation through two-way television: A controlled study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 31(1), 32-34.
16. Equal Access to Software and Information. (2005). Retrieved November 14, 2010, from http://people.rit.edu/easi.
17. Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, Third Edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
18. Gillan, D. J., & Cooke N.J. (1995). Methods of Cognitive Analysis for HCI. Retrieved April 7, 2006, from http://www.sigchi.org/chi95/proceedings/tutors/dg2_bdy.htm
19. Gunawardena, C., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.
20. Hackman, M. Z., & Walker, K. B. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education, 39, 196-206.
21. Hamit, F. (1995). From telemedicine to remote telepresence surgery. Advanced Imaging, 10(8), 21-35.
22. Heeter, C. (1992). Being There: The subjective experience of presence. Presence, 1(2), 262-271.
23. Held, R. M., & Durlach, N. I. (1992). Telepresence. Presence, 1(1), 109-112.
24. Hoffmann, E. R., & Mortimer, R. G. (1994). Drivers' estimates of time to collision. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26(4), 511-520.
25. International Society for Presence Research. (2003). Retrieved October 15, 2009, from http://www.ispr.info.
26. Jerome, L. (1986). Telepsychiatry. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 31(5), 489.
27. Krug, S. (2006). Don't Make Me Think: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability, 2nd Edition. New Riders.
28. Law, E., Hvannberg, E., Cockton, G., Jeffries, R., & Wixon, D. (2008). Maturing Usability: Quality in Software, Interaction and Value (Human-Computer Interaction Series). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
29. Lawrence, M., & Low, G. (1993). Exploring Individual User Satisfaction Within User-Led Development. MIS Quarterly, 17(2), 195-208.
30. Lombard, M. (1995). Direct responses to people on the screen: Television and personal space. Communication Research, 22(3), 288-324.
31. Lombard, M., Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of It all: the concept of presence. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(2). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/lombard.html.
32. Lombard, M., Ditton, T. B., Crane, D., Davis, B., Gil-Egui, G., Horvath, K., Rossman, J., & Park, S. (2000). Measuring presence: a literature-based approach to the development of a standardized paper-and-pencil instrument. Presented at the Third International Workshop on Presence, Delft, The Netherlands. Retrieved July 15, 2003, from http://www.matthewlombard.com/P2000.htm
33. Lombard, M., Ditton, T., & Weinstein, L. (2009). Measuring telepresence: The Temple Presence Inventory. Presented at the Twelfth International Workshop on Presence, Los Angeles, California, USA. Retrieved April 30, 2010, from http://www.temple.edu/ispr/prev_conferences/proceedings/2009/Lombard_et_ al.pdf
34. Lombard, M., & Jones, M. T. (in press). Defining presence. In F. Biocca, W.A. Ijsselsteijn, J. Freeman, & M. Lombard (Editors), Immersed in Media: Telepresence Theory, Measurement and Technology. New York: Routledge.
35. McLeod, R. W., & Ross, H. E. (1981). Optic-flow and cognitive factors in time-to-collision estimates. Perception, 12, 417-423.
36. McNally, R. (1987). Preparedness and phobias: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 283-303.
37. Moon, Y. & Nass, C. (1996a). Adaptive agents and personality change: Complimentary versus similarity as forms of adaptation. Proceedings of the CHI Conference, April 13-18, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
38. Moon, Y. & Nass, C. (1996b). How real are computer personalities? Psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction. Communication Research, 23(6), 651-674.
39. Moore, G. (1997). Sharing faces, places and spaces, the Ontariao telepresence project field studies. In Finn, K. E., Sellen, A.J., & Wilbur, S. B. (Eds.) Video-Mediated Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Nass, C., & Brave, S. (2005). Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human Computer Relationship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., & Moon, Y. (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(6), 669-678.
42. Nass, C.I., & Green, N. (1993). Engendering computers: Gender of voice and stereotyping of computers. Presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Miami, FL.
43. Nass, C., Lombard, M., Henriksen, L., & Steuer, J. (1995). Anthropocentrism and computers. Behaviour and Information Technology, 14(4), 229-238.
44. Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (1996). Localized autocorrelation diagnostic statistic for sociological models: Time-series, network, and spatial datasets. Sociological Methods and Research, 25(2), 223-247.
45. Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B., & Dryer, D. C. (1995). Can computer personalities be human personalities? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 223-239.
46. Nass, C., Reeves, B., & Leshner, G. (1996). Technology and roles: A tale of two TVs. Journal of Communication, 46(2), 121-128.
47. Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E., & Reeder, H. (1993, April). Anthropomorphism, agency and ethopoeia: Computers as social actors. Presented at INTERCHI'93 conference of the ACM/SIGCHI and the IFIP, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
48. Nass, C., Steuer, J. S., & Tauber, E. (1994). Computers are social actors. Proceeding of the CHI Conference, 72-77, Boston, MA.
49. Nicovich, S. G., Boller, G. W., & Cornwell, T. B. (2005). Experienced presence within computer-mediated communications: Initial explorations on the effects of gender with respect to empathy and immersion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2), article 6. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/nicovich.html
50. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering (Interactive Technologies). Maryland Heights, MO: Academic Press.
51. Nielsen, J. (2003). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Retrieved April 29, 2010, from www.useit.com/alertbox/20030825.html
52. Norman, D. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday Currency.
53. Nosper et al. (2005). Exploring the relationships between the usability of a medium and the sense of Spatial Presence perceived by the user. Proceedings of the Presence 2005 Conference: the eighth annual international workshop on presence, September 21-23, 2005 University College London.
54. Nowak, K., & Biocca, F. (2003). The Effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users Sense of Telepresence, Copresence, and Social Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence, 12(5), 481-494.
55. Ota, D., Loftin, B., Saito, T., Lea, R., & Keller, J. (1995). Virtual reality in surgical education. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 25(2), 127-137.
56. Perlman, G. (1997). Practical usability evaluation. Published in CHI97 March, 1997. Retrieved August 15, 2004, from http://www.sigchi.org/chi97/proceedings/tutorial/gp.htm
57. Picard, R. (1998). Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
58. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., & Carey, T. (1994). Human-computer interaction. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
59. Pruitt, J., & Adlin, T. (2006). The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design (Interactive Technologies). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.
60. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge, MA: University Press.
61. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (2000). Perceptual Bandwidth. Communications of the ACM, 43(3), 65-70.
62. Rice, R.E. (1984). The new media: communication, research and technology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
63. Rice, R. E. (1992). Task analyzability, use of new medium and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science, 3(4), 475-500.
64. Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 451-484.
65. Rice, R. E., D'Ambra, J., & More, E. (1998). Cross-cultural comparison of organizational media evaluation and choice. Journal of Communication, 48(3), 3-26.
66. Scott, B., & Neil, T. (2009). Designing Web Interfaces: Principles and Patterns for Rich Interactions. North Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
67. Scott, C. R., & Timmerman, C. E. (1999). Communication technology user and multiple workplace identifications among organizational teleworkers with varied degrees of virtuality. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42(4), 240-260.
68. Shackel, B., Preece, J., & Keller, L. editors (1990). Human factors and usability. In Human-Computer Interaction: Selected Readings. Prentice Hall.
69. Shiva, G. (2000). Computer Design and Architecture. New York: Harper Collins.
70. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., & Jacobs S. (2010). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction (5th Edition). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
71. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
72. So, H., & Brush, T. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318-336.
73. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: new ways of working in the networked organization. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
74. Stoker, C. R., Barch, D. R., Hine III B. P., & Barry, J. (1995). Antarctic undersea exploration using a robotic submarine with a telepresence user interface. IEEE Expert, 10(6), 14-23.
75. Sylaiou, S., Mania, K., Karoulis, A., & White, M. (2010). Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies archive, 68(5), 243-253.
76. Tidwell, J. (2005). Designing Interfaces: Patterns for Effective Interaction Design. North Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
77. Universal Usability.org. (n.d.). Retrieved May 2, 2004, from http://universalusability.org
78. Wiesenfeld, B., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (1998). Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. The Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(4). Retreived from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/wiesenfeld.html
79. Weiser, M. (1993). Some Computer Science Issues in Ubiquitous Computing. Communications of the ACM archive, Special issue on computer augmented environments: back to the real world, 36(7), 75-84.
80. Xerox Palo Alto Research Center for ubiquitous computing. Retrieved April 16, 2003 from, http://www.ubiq.com.
81. Yan, Y., & Ouhyoung, M. (1994). A three dimension building authoring tool based on line-drawing understanding. In T. Rongxi (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computer-Aid Drafting, Design, and Manufacturing Technology (vol. I) (pp. 279-285). Beijing, China: International Academic Publishers.