Sufficient conditions for uniqueness of the weak value

Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Dressel, J ^a   Jordan, A N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 83455163822     PISSN: 17518113     EISSN: 17518121     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/45/1/015304     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aharonov Y, Albert D Z and Vaidman L 1988 How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1351
2. Ritchie N W M, Story J G and Hulet R G 1991 Realization of a measurement of a weak value Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 1107
3. Parks A D, Cullin D W and Stoudt D C 1998 Observation and measurement of an optical AharonovAlbertVaidman effect Proc. R. Soc. 454 2997
4. Brunner N, Scarani V, Wegmller M, Legr̀ M and Gisin N 2004 Direct measurement of superluminal group velocity and signal velocity in an optical fiber Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 203902
5. Resch K J, Lundeen J S and Steinberg A M 2004 Experimental realization of the quantum box problem Phys. Lett. A 324 125
6. Pryde G J, OBrien J L, White A G, Ralph T C and Wiseman H M 2005 Measurement of quantum weak values of photon polarization Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 220405
7. Wang Q, Sun F W, Zhang Y S, Li J, Huang Y F and Guo G C 2006 Experimental demonstration of a method to realize weak measurement of the arrival time of a single photon Phys. Rev. A 73 023814
8. Mir R, Lundeen J S, Mitchell M W, Steinberg A M, Garretson J L and Wiseman H M 2007 A double-slit which-way experiment on the complementarityuncertainty debate New J. Phys. 9 287
9. Lundeen J S and Steinberg A M 2009 Experimental joint weak measurement on a photon pair as a probe of Hardys paradox Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 020404
10. Yokota K, Yamamoto T, Koashi M and Imoto N 2009 Direct observation of Hardys paradox by joint weak measurement with an entangled photon pair New J. Phys. 11 033011
11. Goggin M E, Almeida M P, Barbieri M, Lanyon B P, OBrien J L, White A G and Pryde G J 2011 Violation of the LeggettGarg inequality with weak measurement of photons Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108 1256
12. Dressel J, Broadbent C J, Howell J C and Jordan A N 2011 Experimental violation of two-party LeggettGarg inequalities with semiweak measurements Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 040402
13. Kocsis S, Braverman B, Ravets S, Stevens M J, Mirin R P, Shalm L K and Steinberg A M 2011 Observing the average trajectories of single photons in a two-slit interferometer Science 332 1170
14. Lundeen J S, Sutherland B, Patel A, Stewart C and Bamber C 2011 Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction Nature 474 188
15. Aharonov Y, Bergmann P G and Lebowitz J L 1964 Time symmetry in the quantum process of measurement Phys. Rev. 134 B1410
16. Aharonov Y and Vaidman L 2008 The two-state vector formalism: an updated review Lecture Notes Phys. 734 399
17. Aharonov Y, Botero A, Popescu S, Reznik B and Tollaksen J 2002 Revisiting Hardys paradox: counterfactual statements, real measurements, entanglement and weak values Phys. Lett. A 301 130
18. Rohrlich D and Aharonov Y 2002 Cherenkov radiation of superluminal particles Phys. Rev. A 66 042102
19. Wiseman H M 2003 Directly observing momentum transfer in twin-slit which-way experiments Phys. Lett. A 311 285
20. Aharonov Y and Botero A 2005 Quantum averages of weak values Phys. Rev. A 72 52111
21. Ralph T C, Bartlett S D, OBrien J L, Pryde G J and Wiseman H M 2006 Quantum nondemolition measurements for quantum information Phys. Rev. A 73 012113
22. Wiseman H M 2007 Grounding Bohmian mechanics in weak values and Bayesianism New J. Phys. 9 165
23. Williams N S and Jordan A N 2008 Weak values and the LeggettGarg inequality in solid-state qubits Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 026804
24. Romito A, Gefen Y and Blanter Y M 2008 Weak values of electron spin in a double quantum dot Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 056801
25. Hosoya A and Shikano Y 2010 Strange weak values J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 385307
26. Hosten O and Kwiat P 2008 Observation of the spin Hall effect of light via weak measurements Science 319 787
27. Dixon P B, Starling D J, Jordan A N and Howell J C 2009 Ultrasensitive beam deflection measurement via interferometric weak value amplification Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 173601
28. Starling D J, Dixon P B, Jordan A N and Howell J C 2009 Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio of a beam-deflection measurement with interferometric weak values Phys. Rev. A 80 041803
29. Howell J C, Starling D J, Dixon P B, Vudyasetu P K and Jordan A N 2010 Interferometric weak value deflections: quantum and classical treatments Phys. Rev. A 81 033813
30. Starling D J, Dixon P B, Williams N S, Jordan A N and Howell J C 2010 Continuous phase amplification with a Sagnac interferometer Phys. Rev. A 82 011802
31. Starling D J, Dixon P B, Jordan A N and Howell J C 2010 Precision frequency measurements with interferometric weak values Phys. Rev. A 82 063822
32. Dressel J, Agarwal S and Jordan A N 2010 Contextual values of observables in quantum measurements Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 240401
33. Dressel J and Jordan A N 2011 Contextual values approach to the generalized measurement of observables arXiv:1110.0418v1
34. Parrott S 2011 Contextual weak values of quantum measurements with positive measurement operators are not limited to the traditional weak value arXiv:1102.4407v6
35. Parrott S 2011 Introduction to contextual values and a simpler counterexample to a claim of Dressel, Agarwal, and Jordan (2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 240401) arXiv:1105.4188v1
36. Parrott S 2011 Counterexample to Sufficient conditions for uniqueness of the weak value by J Dressel and A N Jordan arXiv:1106.1871v1. arXiv:1105.4188v6
37. Jozsa R 2007 Complex weak values in quantum measurement Phys. Rev. A 76 044103
38. Di Lorenzo A and Egues J C 2008 Weak measurement: effect of the detector dynamics Phys. Rev. A 77 042108
39. Parrott S 2009 What do quantum weak measurements actually measure? arXiv:0908.0035v3
40. Parrott S 2010 Quantum weak values are not unique; what do they actually measure? arXiv:0909.0295v3
41. Geszti T 2010 Postselected weak measurement beyond the weak value Phys. Rev. A 81 044102
42. Dressel J, Choi Y and Jordan A N 2011 Measuring which-path information with coupled electronic MachZehnder interferometers arXiv:1105.2587
43. Wu S and Li Y 2011 Weak measurements beyond the AharonovAlbertVaidman formalism Phys. Rev. A 83 052106
44. Parks A D and Gray J E 2011 Variance control in weak-value measurement pointers Phys. Rev. A 84 012116
45. Kofman A G, Ashhab S and Nori F 2011 Nonperturbative theory of weak pre- and post-selected measurements arXiv:1109.6315v1
46. Wiseman H M and Milburn G J 2009 Quantum Measurement and Control (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) p 40