From social agents to multi-agent systems: Preliminary report

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 2691, Issue , 2003, Pages 111-121

  Fasli, Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GRAPH THEORY; PROBLEM SOLVING; SET THEORY; SOFTWARE AGENTS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTERS;

BUILDING BLOCKS; INTERACTION GRAPH; SOCIAL AGENTS; BUILDING BLOCKES; FORMAL ANALYSIS; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 8344233344     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45023-8_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. C. Castelfranchi. Commitments: From individual intentions to groups and organisations. In Proceedings of the First ICMAS Conference, pages 41-48, 1995.
2. L. Cavedon and L. Sonenberg, On social commitments, roles and preferred goals. In Proceedings of the Third ICMAS Conference, pages 80-87, 1998.
3. P. R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque. Teamwork. Nous, 25:485-512, 1991.
4. F. Dignum, D. Kinny, and L. Sonenberg. Motivational attitudes of agents: On desires, obligations and norms. In From Theory to Practice in Multi-Agent Systems, Proceedings of the Second International CEEMAS Workshop, pages 83-92, 2002.
5. V. Dignum, J.-J. Ch. Meyer, and H. Weigand. Towards an organizational model for agent societies using contracts. In Proceedings of the First AAMAS Conference, pages 694-695, 2002.
6. B. Dunin-Keplicz and R. Verbrugge. Collective motivational attitudes in cooperative problem solving. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop of Central and Eastern Europe on Multi-Agent Systems (CEEMAS-99), pages 22-41, 1999.
7. R. Fagin, J. Y. Halpern, Y. Moses, and M. Y. Vardi. Reasoning about Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA., 1995.
8. M. Fasli. On obligations, relativised obligations and bilateral commitments. In Proceedings of the Canadian Artificial Intelligence Conference, pages 287-296, 2001.
9. M. Fasli. On commitments, roles and obligations. In From Theory to Practice in Multi-Agent Systems, Second International Workshop of Central and Eastern Europe on Multi-Agent Systems (CEEMAS-01), Revised Papers, pages 93-102, 2002.
10. M. Fasli. Heterogeneous BDI agents. Cognitive Systems Research, 4(1):1-22, 2003.
11. J. Ferber and O. Gutknecht. A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the Third ICMAS Conference, pages 128-135, 1998.
12. B. J. Grosz and S. Kraus. Collaborative plans for complex group action. Artificial Intelligence, 86(2):269-357, 1996.
13. A. Rao and M. Georgeff. Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In Proceedings of the Second Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 473-484, 1991.
14. A. Rao and M. Georgeff. Decision procedures for BDI logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):293-343, 1998.
15. M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings. The cooperative problem-solving process. Journal of Logic and Computation, 9:563-592, 1999.
16. M. Wooldridge, N. R. Jennings, and D. Kinny. The Gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 3:285-312, 2000.
17. F. Zambonelli, N. R. Jennings, and M. Wooldridge. Organisational abstractions for the analysis and design of multi-agent systems. In P. Cinacarini and M. Wooldridge, editors, Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, pages 127-141, 2001.