Motivational attitudes of agents: On desires, obligations, and norms

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2296, Issue , 2002, Pages 83-

  Dignum, Frank ^a   Kinny, David ^b   Sonenberg, Liz ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953651189     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45941-3_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. K. J. Arrow. Social Choice and Individual Values. Yale University Press, 1963.
2. C. Castelfranchi, F. Dignum, C. Jonker and J. Treur. Deliberate Normative Agents: Principles and Architectures, In Proceedings of ATAL-99, Orlando, 1999, pp. 206–220.
3. L. Cavedon, L. Padgham, A. Rao and E. Sonenberg. Revisiting rationality for agents with intentions, In Bridging the Gap, pp. 131-138, World Scientific, 1995.
4. L. Cavedon and L. Sonenberg. On social commitments, roles and preferred goals, In Proceedings of ICMAS’98, Paris, July 1998, (ed) Y Demazeau, pp 80–87.
5. P. Cohen and H. Levesque. Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 42, pages 213–261, 1990.
6. F. Dignum, D. Morley, L. Sonenberg and L. Cavedon. Towards socially sophisticated BDI agents In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems July, Boston, USA, pp 111-118
7. J. Doyle and M. Wellman. Impediments to Universal Preference-Based Default Theories, Artifical Intelligence, Vol. 49, Nr. 1-3, pages 97-128, 1991.
8. M. Fasli. On Commitments, Roles and Obligations, in this volume.
9. L. Hogg and N. Jennings. Variable Socialability in Agent-based decision making, In N. Jennings andY. Lesperance (eds.) Proceedings of ATAL-99, Orlando, 1999, pages 276-290.
10. N. Jennings. Commitments and Conventions: The foundation of coordination in Multi-Agent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 8 (3), pages 223-250, 1993.
11. N. Jennings and J. Campos. Towards a Social Level Characterisation of Socially Responsible Agents. IEEE Proc. on Software Engineering, vol. 144, 1, pp. 11-25, 1997.
12. D. Kinny and M. Georgeff. Commitment and Effectiveness of SituatedAgents. In Proceedings of IJCAI’91, Sydney, 1991, pages 82–88.
13. B. van Linder. Modal Logics for Rational Agents, PhD thesis, 1996, University of Utrecht.
14. A. S. Rao and M. P. Georgeff. Modeling rational agents within a BDI architecture. In: R. Fikes et. al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd CKRR, Morgan Kaufman, pp. 473-484, 1991.
15. A. S. Rao and M. P. Georgeff. BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice. Proceedings of ICMAS 95, San Francisco, 1995.
16. Y. Shoham and M. Tennenholtz. On social laws for artificial agent societies: off-line design. Artificial Intelligence 73 (1995)231-252.
17. L. van der Torre and Y.-H. Tan. Contrary-To-Duty Reasoning with Preference-based Dyadic Obligations. Submitted to Annals of Mathematics and AI.
18. M. Wooldridge. Reasoning about Rational Agents, MIT Press, 2000