Understanding and classifying metabolite space and Metabolite-Likeness

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 12, 2011, Pages

  Peironcely, Julio E ^a,b,c   Reijmers, Theo ^b,c   Coulier, Leon ^a,c   Bender, Andreas ^d   Hankemeier, Thomas ^b,c  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c Netherlands Metabolomics Centre   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NITROGEN; OXYGEN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN LEARNING; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CONTROLLED STUDY; LINEAR SYSTEM; METABOLITE; METABOLOMICS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREDICTION; RANDOM FOREST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; VALIDATION PROCESS; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; HUMAN; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATABASES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; METABOLOMICS; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 83355172941     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028966     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. German JB, Roberts MA, Fay L, Watkins SM, (2002) Metabolomics and the Nutritional Sciences Metabolomics and Individual Metabolic Assessment: The Next Great Challenge for Nutrition. J Nutr pp. 2486-2487.
2. Nielsen J, Oliver S, (2005) The next wave in metabolome analysis. Trends Biotechnol 23: 544-6 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16154652. Accessed 4 Jan 2011.
3. Hall R, Beale M, Fiehn O, Hardy N, Sumner L, et al. (2002) Plant metabolomics: the missing link in functional genomics strategies. Plant Cell 14: 1437-40 Available:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=543394&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
4. Scalbert A, Brennan L, Fiehn O, Hankemeier T, Kristal BS, et al. (2009) Mass-spectrometry-based metabolomics: limitations and recommendations for future progress with particular focus on nutrition research. Metabolomics 5: 435-458 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20046865.
5. Lu W, Bennett BD, Rabinowitz JD, (2008) Analytical strategies for LC-MS-based targeted metabolomics. Journal of Chromatography B 871: 236-242 Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6X0P-4SD29SP-2/2/aafe91a89dbb5e9c37471a58672a4038.
6. Wishart D, (2008) Quantitative metabolomics using NMR. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem 27: 228-237 Available:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165993607002622. Accessed 4 Oct 2010.
7. Dettmer K, Aronov PA, Hammock BD, (2007) MASS SPECTROMETRY-BASED METABOLOMICS. Mass Spectrom Rev pp. 51-78 doi:10.1002/mas.
8. Dunn WB, Ellis DI, (2008) Metabolomics: Current analytical platforms and methodologies. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem 24: 285-294 Available:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165993605000348.
9. Lindon J, Nicholson J, (2008) Analytical technologies for metabonomics and metabolomics, and multi-omic information recovery. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem 27: 194-204 -Available:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165993607002099. Accessed 13 Dec 2010.
10. Brown M, Wedge DC, Goodacre R, Kell DB, Baker PN, et al. (2011) Automated workflows for accurate mass-based putative metabolite identification in LC/MS-derived metabolomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27: 1108-12 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21325300.
11. Bowen BP, Northen TR, (2010) Dealing with the unknown: metabolomics and metabolite atlases. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 21: 1471-6 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20452782. Accessed 2 Jun 2011.
12. Fiehn O, Kind T, Barupal DK, (2011) Data Processing, Metabolomic Databases and Pathway Analysis. Annual Plant Reviews Volume 43 Wiley-Blackwell pp. 367-406 Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444339956.ch12.
13. Kind T, Fiehn O, (2010) Advances in structure elucidation of small molecules using mass spectrometry. Bioanalytical Reviews 2: 23-60 Available:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3015162&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 14 Feb 2011.
14. Kind T, Fiehn O, (2006) Metabolomic database annotations via query of elemental compositions: mass accuracy is insufficient even at less than 1 ppm. BMC bioinformatics 7: 234 Available:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1464138&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 22 Jul 2011.
15. Kind T, Fiehn O, (2007) Seven Golden Rules for heuristic filtering of molecular formulas obtained by accurate mass spectrometry. BMC bioinformatics 8: 105 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17389044.
16. Dunn WB, Broadhurst D, Begley P, Zelena E, Francis-McIntyre S, et al. (2011) Procedures for large-scale metabolic profiling of serum and plasma using gas chromatography and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc 6: 1060-1083 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21720319. Accessed 4 Jul 2011.
17. Molchanova MS, Shcherbukhin VV, Zefirov NS, (1996) Computer Generation of Molecular Structures by the SMOG Program. J Chem Inf Model 36: 888-899 Available:http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/doilookup/?10.1021/ci950393z.
18. Badertscher M, Korytko A, Schulz K-P, Madison M, Munk ME, et al. (2000) Assemble 2.0: a structure generator. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 51: 73-79 Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TFP-40797NT-7/2/d31bcf333f012c66dceb3b4a4414b2b2.
19. Schymanski EL, Meinert C, Meringer M, Brack W, (2008) The use of MS classifiers and structure generation to assist in the identification of unknowns in effect-directed analysis. Anal Chim Acta 615: 136-147 Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TF4-4S6P238-7/2/28f4a4b38858041a7fc2cf5c3767022c.
20. Kind T, Scholz M, Fiehn O, (2009) How large is the metabolome? A critical analysis of data exchange practices in chemistry. PloS one 4: e5440 Available:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2673031&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 17 Dec 2010.
21. Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC, Eisner R, Young N, et al. (2009) HMDB: a knowledgebase for the human metabolome. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D603-610 Available:http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/37/suppl_1/D603.
22. Go EP, (2010) Database resources in metabolomics: an overview. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 5: 18-30 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19418229.
23. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Hirakawa M, (2010) KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D355-60 Available:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2808910&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 21 Jul 2010.
24. Karp PD, Ouzounis C, Moore-Kochlacs C, Goldovsky L, Kaipa P, et al. (2005) Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 6083-9 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16246909.
25. Smith CA, Maille GO, Want EJ, Qin C, Trauger SA, et al. (2005) METLIN: A Metabolite Mass Spectral Database. Ther Drug Monit 27: 747-751.
26. Schymanski EL, Meringer M, Brack W, (2011) Automated Strategies To Identify Compounds on the Basis of GC/EI-MS and Calculated Properties. Anal Chem 83: 903-912 Available:http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ac102574h.
27. Nobeli I, Ponstingl H, Krissinel EB, Thornton JM, (2003) A Structure-based Anatomy of the E.coli Metabolome. J Mol Biol 334: 697-719 Available:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022283603012671. Accessed 25 Dec 2010.
28. Gupta S, Aires-de-Sousa J, (2007) Comparing the chemical spaces of metabolites and available chemicals: models of metabolite-likeness. Mol Diversity 11: 23-36 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17447158. Accessed 4 Aug 2010.
29. Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK, (2005) ZINC: a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 45: 177-82 Available:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1360656&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
30. Dobson PD, Patel Y, Kell DB, (2009) "Metabolite-likeness" as a criterion in the design and selection of pharmaceutical drug libraries. Drug Discov Today 14: 31-40 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19049901. Accessed 21 Jul 2010.
31. Rogers D, Hahn M, (2010) Extended-connectivity fingerprints. J Chem Inf Model 50: 742-54 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20426451.
32. Durant JL, Leland B, Henry DR, Nourse JG, (2002) Reoptimization of MDL keys for use in drug discovery. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 42: 1273-80 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12444722.
33. Cortes C, Vapnik V, (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20: 273-297 Available:http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF00994018.
34. Breiman L, (2001) Random Forests. Mach Learn 45: 5-32 Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
35. Klon AE, Glick M, Davies JW, (2004) Combination of a naive Bayes classifier with consensus scoring improves enrichment of high-throughput docking results. J Med Chem 47: 4356-9 -Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15317449.
36. Accelrys Pipeline Pilot, version 6.1.5; Accelrys Inc.: San Diego, CA, 2010 (2010) Accelrys Pipeline Pilot, version 6.1.5; Accelrys Inc.: San Diego, CA.
37. Golbraikh A, Tropsha A, (2002) Predictive QSAR modeling based on diversity sampling of experimental datasets for the training and test set selection. J Comput.-Aided Mol Des 16: 357-69 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12489684.
38. Schuffenhauer A, Brown N, (2006) Chemical diversity and biological activity. Drug Discov Today 3: 387-395 Available:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1740674906000801. Accessed 23 Jan 2011.
39. Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC, Cheng D, Shrivastava S, et al. (2008) DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D901-6 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18048412.
40. Warr W, (2009) ChEMBL. An interview with John Overington, team leader, chemogenomics at the European Bioinformatics Institute Outstation of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL-EBI) J Comput.-Aided Mol Des 23: 195-198 Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-009-9260-9.
41. Bender A, (2010) How similar are those molecules after all? Use two descriptors and you will have three different answers. Expert Opin Drug Discovery 5: 1141-1151.
42. Bender A, Glen RC, (2004) Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics. Organic & biomolecular chemistry 2: 3204-18 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15534697.
43. Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P, (1987) Principal component analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 2: 37-52 Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0169743987800849.
44. Josse J, (2008) FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal Of Statistical Software 25: 1-18.
45. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ, (1984) Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth pp. 368 Available:http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Classificationandregressiontrees#0.
46. Hothorn T, Hornik K, Zeileis A, (2006) Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15: 651-674 Available:http://pubs.amstat.org/doi/abs/10.1198/106186006X133933.
47. Bemis GW, Murcko M, (1996) The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks. J Med Chem 39: 2887-93 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8709122.
48. Domingos P, (1997) On the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier under Zero-One Loss. 130: 103-130.
49. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available:http://www.r-project.org/.
50. Dimitriadou E, Hornik K, Leisch F, Meyer D, Andreas Weingessel, (2010) e1071: Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics (e1071), TU Wien. Available:http://cran.r-project.org/package=e1071.
51. Chang C-C, Lin C-J, (2011) LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 2: 27:1-27:27.
52. Liaw A, Wiener M, (2002) Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News 2: 18-22 Available:http://cran.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/.
53. Noble WS, (2006) What is a support vector machine? Nature biotechnology 24: 1565-7 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17160063.
54. Li Q, Bender A, Pei J, Lai L, (2007) A large descriptor set and a probabilistic kernel-based classifier significantly improve druglikeness classification. J Chem Inf Model 47: 1776-86 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17718552.
55. Byvatov E, Fechner U, Sadowski J, Schneider G, (2003) Comparison of Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network Systems for Drug/Nondrug Classification. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43: 1882-1889 Available:http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ci0341161.
56. Bender A, Mussa HY, Glen RC, Reiling S, (2004) Molecular Similarity Searching Using Atom Environments, Information-Based Feature Selection, and a Naïve Bayesian Classifier. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Siences pp. 170-178.
57. Bender A, Mussa HY, Glen RC, Reiling S, (2004) Similarity searching of chemical databases using atom environment descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): evaluation of performance. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44: 1708-18 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15446830.
58. Provost F, (2000) Machine Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets 101. Invited paper for the AAAI'2000 Workshop on Imbalanced Data Sets.
59. Fourches D, Muratov E, Tropsha A, (2010) Trust, but verify: on the importance of chemical structure curation in cheminformatics and QSAR modeling research. J Chem Inf Model 50: 1189-204 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20572635.
60. Hawkins DM, (2004) The problem of overfitting. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44: 1-12 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14741005.
61. Baumann K, (2003) Cross-validation as the objective function for variable-selection techniques. Trends Anal Chem 22: 395-406 Available:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165993603006071. Accessed 8 Jan 2011.
62. Kohavi R, (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proceedings of the 14th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence- Volume 2 San Francisco, CA, USA Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc pp. 1137-1143 Available:http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1643031.1643047.
63. Breiman L, Spector P, (1992) Submodel Selection and Evaluation in Regression: The X-Random Case. Int Stat Rev 60: 291-319.
64. Hert J, Irwin JJ, Laggner C, Keiser MJ, Shoichet BK, (2009) Quantifying biogenic bias in screening libraries. Nat Chem Biol 5: 479-83 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19483698.
65. Hert J, Willett P, Wilton DJ, Acklin P, Azzaoui K, et al. (2004) Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. Organic & biomolecular chemistry 2: 3256-66 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15534703.
66. Bender A, Jenkins JL, Scheiber J, Sukuru SCK, Glick M, et al. (2009) How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space. J Chem Inf Model 49: 108-19 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19123924.
67. Bender A, Glen RC, (2005) A discussion of measures of enrichment in virtual screening: comparing the information content of descriptors with increasing levels of sophistication. J Chem Inf Model 45: 1369-75 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16180913.
68. Ertl P, Roggo S, Schuffenhauer A, (2008) Natural product-likeness score and its application for prioritization of compound libraries. J Chem Inf Model 48: 68-74 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18034468.