A combined morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis of Parthenocissus (Vitaceae) and taxonomic implications

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 168, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 43-63

  Lu, Limin ^a,b   Wen, Jun ^a,c   Chen, Zhiduan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Morphology; Phylogeny; Seed morphology

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; ORNAMENTATION; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; POLLEN; TAXONOMY;

ASIA; NORTH AMERICA;

PARTHENOCISSUS; PARTHENOCISSUS QUINQUEFOLIA; PARTHENOCISSUS SEMICORDATA; VITACEAE;

EID: 83255193984     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: 10958339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01186.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Blume CJ. 1825. Bijdragen tot de Flora van Nederlandsch Indië. 1ste Stuk. Batavia: Ter Lands Drukkerij.
2. Brizicky GK. 1965. The genera of Vitaceae in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 46: 48-67.
3. Chen I. 2009. History of Vitaceae inferred from morphology-based phylogeny and the fossil record of seeds. Thesis, University of Florida.
4. Chen I, Manchester SR. 2007. Seed morphology of modern and fossil Ampelocissus (Vitaceae) and implications for phytogeography. American Journal of Botany 94: 1534-1553.
5. Chen ZD, Ren H, Wen J. 2007. Vitaceae. In: Wu ZY, Hong DY, Raven PH, eds. Flora of China. Vol. 12. Beijing: Science Press; and St Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 173-177.
6. Dilcher DL. 1974. Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. Botanical Review 40: 91-108.
7. Ellis B, Daly DC, Hickey LJ, Johnson KR, Mitchell JD, Wilf P, Wing SL. 2009. Manual of leaf architecture. New York: Cornell University Press.
8. Erdtman G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angiosperms. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
9. Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics: The International Journal of the Willi Hennig Society 10: 315-319.
10. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
11. Fitch WM. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406-416.
12. Galet P. 1967. Recherches sur les méthodes d'identification et de classification des Vitacées temprées. II, Thesis, Université de Montpellier.
13. Gerrath JM, Posluszny U. 1989. Morphological and anatomical development in the Vitaceae. IV. Floral development in Parthenocissus inserta. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 1356-1365.
14. Ingrouille MJ, Chase MW, Fay MF, Bowman D, Bank MVD, Bruijn ADE. 2002. Systematics of Vitaceae from the viewpoint of plastid rbcL DNA sequence data. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 138: 421-432.
15. Latiff A. 1982. Studies in Malesian Vitaceae, I-IV. Federation Museums Journal 27: 46-93.
16. Li CL. 1990. Yua C.L. Li - a new genus of Vitaceae. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 12: 1-10.
17. Li CL. 1996. New taxa in Vitaceae from China. Chinese Journal of Applied Environmental Biology 2: 43-53.
18. Li CL. 1998. Vitaceae. In: Delectis Florae Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae Agendae Academiae Sinicae Edita, ed. Flora reipublicae popularis sinicae. Vol. 48. Beijing: Science Press, 1-177.
19. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2010. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.74. Available at:.
20. Nie ZL, Sun H, Chen ZD, Meng Y, Manchester SR, Wen J. 2010. Molecular phylogeny and biogeographic diversification of Parthenocissus (Vitaceae) disjunct between Asia and North America. American Journal of Botany. 97: 1342-1353.
21. Planchon JE. 1887. Monographie des Ampélidées vrais. In: de Candolle AFPP, de Candolle C, eds. Monographiae phanerogamarum. Paris: G. Masson, 305-654.
22. Rambaut A. 2002. Se-Al: sequence alignment editor. Version 2.0a11. Oxford: University of Oxford, Available at:.
23. Rehder AA. 1905. Parthenocissus. In: Sargent CS, ed. Trees and shrubs. Cambridge: The Riverside Press, 183-190.
24. Rehder AA. 1934. Notes on the ligneous plants described by Léveillé from eastern Asia. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 15: 1-27.
25. Ren H, Pan KY, Chen ZD, Wang RQ. 2003. Structural characters of leaf epidermis and their systematic significance in Vitaceae. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 41: 531-544.
26. Roxburgh W. 1824. Flora indica. Vol. 2. Serampore: The Mission Press.
27. Shetty BV, Singh P. 2000. Vitaceae. In: Singh NP, Vohra JN, Hajra PK, Singh DK, eds. Flora of India. Vol. 5. Calcutta: Botanical Survey of India, 246-324.
28. Soejima A, Wen J. 2006. Phylogenetic analysis of the grape family (Vitaceae) based on three chloroplast markers. American Journal of Botany 93: 278-287.
29. Stace CA. 1965. Cuticular studies as an aid to plant taxonomy. Bulletin of British Museum (Natural History) Botany 4: 1-78.
30. Suessenguth K. 1953. Vitaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die natürlichen pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 174-333.
31. Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). V. 4.0beta10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
32. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876-4882.
33. Tiffney BH. 1979. Nomenclatural revision: Brandon Vitaceae. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 27: 91-92.
34. Tiffney BH, Barghoorn ES. 1976. Fruits and seeds of Brandon lignite. 1. Vitaceae. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 22: 169-191.
35. Wen J. 2007. Vitaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 9. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 466-478.
36. Wen J, Nie ZL, Soejima A, Meng Y. 2007. Phylogeny of Vitaceae based on the nuclear GAI1 gene sequences. Canadian Journal of Botany 85: 731-745.
37. Wilkinson HP. 1979. The plant surface (mainly leaf). In: Metcalfe CR, Chalk L, eds. Anatomy of the dicotyledons, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 97-167.