Scoring to predict the possibility of upgrades to malignancy in atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy device: An external validation study

European Journal of Cancer

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 30-36

  Bendifallah, S ^a,b   Defert, S ^c   Chabbert Buffet, N ^a   Maurin, N ^a   Chopier, J ^a   Antoine, M ^a   Bezu, C ^a   Touche, D ^d   Uzan, S ^a   Graesslin, O ^c   Rouzier, R ^a,b,e  

^a HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c REIMS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d INSTITUT JEAN GODINOT   (France)

^e INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Atypical ductal hyperplasia; Mathematical models; Scoring system; Underestimation rate; Upgrading rate; Vacuum assisted biopsy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ATYPICAL DUCTAL HYPERPLASIA; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DUCT; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; HUMAN; KO SCORING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VACUUM ASSISTED BIOPSY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CELL TRANSFORMATION, NEOPLASTIC; DISEASE PROGRESSION; EFFICIENCY; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SYRINGES; VACUUM;

EID: 83255176724     PISSN: 09598049     EISSN: 18790852     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. J.E. Dahlstrom, S. Sutton, and S. Jain Histological precision of stereotactic core biopsy in diagnosis of malignant and premalignant breast lesions Histopathology 28 1996 537 541
2. S.H. Parker, J.D. Lovin, and W.E. Jobe Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies Radiology 180 1991 403 407
3. S.N. Ciatto, D. Houssami, and S. Ambrogetti Accuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: the Florence experience of over 4000 consecutive biopsies Breast Cancer Res Treat 101 2007 291 297
4. R.J. Jackman, R.L. Birdwell, and D.M. Ikeda Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 224 2002 548 554
5. F.A. Tavassoli, and P. Devilee WHO classification tumors of the breast and female genital organs 2003 WHO IARC
6. F.A. Tavassoli, and H.J. Norris A comparison of the results of long-term follow-up for atypical intraductal hyperplasia and intraductal hyperplasia of the breast Cancer 65 1990 518 529
7. W.D. Dupont, and D.L. Page Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease N Engl J Med 312 1985 146 151
8. P.P. Rosen Proliferative breast 'disease'. An unresolved diagnostic dilemma Cancer 71 1993 3798 3807
9. I.T. Yeh, D. Dimitrov, and P. Otto Pathologic review of atypical hyperplasia identified by image-guided breast needle core biopsy. Correlation with excision specimen Arch Pathol Lab Med 127 2003 49 54
10. G. Adrales, P. Turk, T. Wallace, R. Bird, H.J. Norton, and F. Greene Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by Mammotome? Am J Surg 180 2002 313 315
11. L.E. Philpotts, C.H. Lee, and L.J. Horvath Underestimation of breast cancer with II-gauge vacuum suction biopsy AJR Am J Roentgenol 175 2000 1047 1050
12. C. Forgeard, M. Benchaib, and N. Guerin Is surgical biopsy mandatory in case of atypical ductal hyperplasia on 11-gauge core needle biopsy? A retrospective study of 300 patients Am J Surg 196 2008 339 345
13. O. Graesslin, M. Antoine, and J. Chopier Histology after lumpectomy in women with epithelial atypia on stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy Eur J Surg Oncol 36 2010 170 175
14. American College of Radiology Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 4th ed. 2003 American College of Radiology Reston, VA
15. E. Ko, W. Han, and J.W. Lee Scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy Breast Cancer Res Treat 112 2008 189 195
16. C. Coutant, C. Olivier, and E. Lambaudie Comparison of models to predict nonsentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: a prospective multicenter study J Clin Oncol 27 2009 2800 2808
17. J.A. Hanley, and B.J. McNeil The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve Radiology 143 1982 29 36
18. D. Cox Two further applications of a model for binary regression Biometrika 45 1958 562 565
19. A.C. Justice, K.E. Covinsky, and J.A. Berlin Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information Ann Intern Med 130 1999 515 524
20. T.G. McGinn, G.H. Guyatt, and P.C. Wyer Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group JAMA 284 2000 79 84
21. J.A. Knottnerus Prediction rules: statistical reproducibility and clinical similarity Med Decis Making 12 1992 286 287
22. J.R. Kohr, P.R. Eby, and K.H. Allison Risk of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia after stereotactic breast biopsy: effects of number of foci and complete removal of calcifications Radiology 255 2010 723 730
23. K.H. Allison, P.R. Eby, and J. Kohr Atypical ductal hyperplasia on vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: suspicion for ductal carcinoma in situ can stratify patients at high risk for upgrade Hum Pathol 42 2010 41 50
24. S. Penco, S. Rizzo, and A.C. Bozzini Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy is not a therapeutic procedure even when all mammographically found calcifications are removed: analysis of 4,086 procedures AJR Am J Roentgenol 195 2010 1255 1260
25. I. Deshaies, L. Provencher, and S. Jacob Factors associated with upgrading to malignancy at surgery of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on core biopsy Breast 20 2010 50 55
26. C.V. Nguyen, C.T. Albarracin, and G.J. Whitman Atypical ductal hyperplasia in directional vacuum-assisted biopsy of breast microcalcifications: considerations for surgical excision Ann Surg Oncol 18 2010 752 761
27. E.M. Doren, J. Hulvat, and P. Norton Predicting cancer on excision of atypical ductal hyperplasia Am J Surg 195 2008 358 361
28. Y.H. Yu, C. Liang, and X.Z. Yuan Diagnostic value of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for breast carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review Breast Cancer Res Treat 120 2010 469 479
29. I.V. Tetko, D.J. Livingstone, and A.I. Luik Neural network studies. Comparison of overfitting J Chem Inf Comput Sci 35 1995 826 833
30. A.C. Degnim, C. Reynolds, and G. Pantvaidya Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram Am J Surg 190 2005 543 550
31. J.C. Boughey, L.C. Hartmann, and S.S. Anderson Evaluation of the Tyrer-Cuzick (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study) model for breast cancer risk prediction in women with atypical hyperplasia J Clin Oncol 28 2010 3591 3596
32. V.S. Pankratz, L.C. Hartmann, and A.C. Degnim Assessment of the accuracy of the Gail model in women with atypical hyperplasia J Clin Oncol 26 2008 5374 5379