Design of a continuous multifaceted guideline-implementation strategy based on computerized decision support

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 160, Issue PART 1, 2010, Pages 836-840

  Van Engen Verheul, Mariëtte ^a   De Keizer, Nicolette ^a   Hellemans, Irene ^a   Kraaijenhagen, Roderik ^b   Hasman, Arie ^a   Peek, Niels ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NDDO Institute for Prevention and Early Diagnostics NIPED   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Access and evaluation; Cardiac rehabilitation; Health care quality; Practice guidelines as topic

Indexed keywords

PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;

ACCESS AND EVALUATION; CARDIAC REHABILITATIONS; CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES; COMPUTERIZED DECISION; CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 78649503034     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-588-4-836     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Field MJ, Lohr KN. Guidelines for clinical practice: directions for a new program. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press; 1990.
2. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993;342(8883):1317-22.
3. Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Tetroe J. Implementing clinical guidelines: current evidence and future implications. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2004;24 Suppl 1: S31-S37.
4. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the Twenty-first Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
5. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8(6): iii-iv, 1-72.
6. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999;282(15):1458-65.
7. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293(10):1223-38.
8. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005;330(7494):765.
9. Ferlie EB, Shortell SM. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Q 2001;79(2):281-315.
10. Greenfield S. Continuous quality improvement and the physician: Building bridges with outcomes research. In: Blumenthal D, Scheck AC, eds. Improving Clinical Practice: Total Quality Management and the Physician. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1995. p. 51-71.
11. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Getting evidence into practice. Effective health care. Plymouth, Great Britain: Latimer Trend & Company Ltd; 1999.
12. Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJ, Mistiaen P. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008;8:38.
13. Laffel F, Blumenthal D. The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organizations. JAMA 1989;262:2869.
14. Langley GL, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance (2nd ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2009.
15. Berner ES. Clinical Decision Support Systems: Theory and Practice. New York: Springer; 2007.
16. Shiffman RN, Liaw Y, Brandt CA, Corb GJ. Computerbased guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999;6(2):104-14.
17. Thomson O'Brien MA, Oxman AD, Davis DA, et al. Audit and feedback versus alternative strategies: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD000260.
18. Thomas RJ, King M, Lui K, et al. AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50(14):1400-33.
19. Bethell H, Lewin R, Dalal H. Cardiac rehabilitation in the United Kingdom. Heart 2009;95(4):271-5
20. Skinner JS, Cooper A, Feder GS. Secondary prevention for patients after a myocardial infarction: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2007;334(7603):1112-3.
21. Rehabilitation Committee (NHS-NVVC). Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation. 2004. The Hague: Netherlands Heart Foundation. (http://www.hartstichting.nl Accessed 25/9/2009).
22. Goud R, Hasman A, Peek N. Development of a guideline based decision support system with explanation facilities for outpatient therapy. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2008;91(2):145-53.
23. Goud R, de Keizer NF, ter RG, Wyatt JC, et al. Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation. BMJ 2009;338: b1440.
24. Goud R, Hasman A, Strijbis AM, Peek N. A parallel guideline development and formalization strategy to improve the quality of clinical practice guidelines. Int J Med Inform 2009;78(8):513-20.
25. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O'Brien MA, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (2): CD000259
26. Weissman NW, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, Farmer RM, Weaver MT, Williams OD, Child IG, Pemberton JH, Brown KC, Baker CS. Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABCs of benchmarking. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 August; 5(3):269-81.