Single source information systems can improve data completeness in clinical studies: An example from nuclear medicine

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 169, Issue , 2011, Pages 872-876

  Herzberg, Susanne ^a,b   Dugas, Martin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Data completeness; EHR re use; Follow up; Hospital information system; Reminder system; Single source information system

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE;

DATA COMPLETENESS; EHR RE-USE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; REMINDER SYSTEMS; SINGLE SOURCE;

CLINICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 83055191207     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-806-9-872     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Dugas M, Breil B, Thiemann V, Lechtenbörger J, Vossen G. Single Source Information System to connect patient care and clinical research, Stud Health Technol Inform 150 (2009), 61-65.
2. Kush R, Alschuler L, Ruggeri R, et al. Implementing Single Source: the STARBRITE proof-of-concept study, J Am Med Inform Assoc 14 (2007), 662-673. (Pubitemid 47379561)
3. Williams JG, Cheung WY, Cohen DR, et al. Can randomised trials rely on existing electronic data? A feasibility study to explore the value of routine data in health technology assessment, Health Technology Assessment 7 (2003), 1-117.
4. Dugas M, Lange M, Berdel BE, Müller-Tidow C. Workflow to improve patient recruitment for clinical trials within hospital information systems-a case study, Trials 9 (2008), 2.
5. Herzberg S, Rahbar K, Stegger L, Schäfers M, Dugas M. Concept and implementation of a single source information system in nuclear medicine for myocardial scintigraphy (SPECT-CT data), Appl Clin Inf 1 (2010), 50-67.
6. Chan KS, Fowles J, Weiner JP. Electronic health records and reliability and validity of quality measures: A review of the literature, Medical Care Research and Review 67 (2010) 503-527.
7. Ammenwerth E, Spötl HP. The time needed for clinical documentation versus direct patient care, Methods Inf Med 48 (2009) 84-91.
8. Forster M, Bailey C, Brinkhof MW, et al. Electronic medical record systems, data quality and loss to follow-up: survey of antiretroviral therapy programmes in resource-limited settings, Bulletin of the Word Health Organization 86 (2008), 939-947.
9. Herzberg S, Fritz F, Rahbar K, Stegger L, Schäfers M, Dugas M. HIS-based support of follow-up documentation-concept and implementation for clinical studies, Appl Clin Inf 2 (2011), 1-17.
10. Herzberg S, Rahbar K, Stegger L, Schäfers M, Dugas M. Concept and implementation of a computerbased reminder system to increase completeness in clinical documentation, Int J Med Inform 80 (2011), 351-358.
11. AGFA.com [Internet]. Agfa Healthcare; c2011 [updated 2010 Mar 25; cited 2011 Jan 16]. Available from: http://healthcare.agfa.com/.
12. SPSS.com [Internet]. Illinois: SPSS, Inc.; c2011 [cited 2011 Jan 16]. Available from: http://www.spss.com/.
13. Hogan WR, Wagner MM. Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records, J Am Med Inform Assoc. 5 (1997) 342-355. (Pubitemid 127433629)
14. CDISC.org [Internet]. Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium; c2011 [cited 2011 Jan 16]. Available from: http://www.cdisc.org/.
15. McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, et al. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies, Trials 7 (2006) 9.
16. Embi PJ, Jain A, Clark J, Bizjack S, et al. Effect of a clinical trial alert system on physician participation in trial recruitment, Arch Intern Med 165 (2005) 2272-2280.
17. Welker JA. Implementation of electronic data capture systems: Barriers and solutions, Contemporary Clinical Trials 28 (2007) 229-236.
18. Staes CJ, Evans RS, Rocha BH, et al. Computerized alerts improve outpatient laboratory monitoring of transplant patients, J Am Med Inform Assoc 15 (2008) 324-332. (Pubitemid 351635888)