HIS-based support of follow-up documentation - Concept and implementation for clinical studies

Applied Clinical Informatics

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-17

  Herzberg, Susanne ^a,b   Fritz, F ^a   Rahbar, K ^a,b   Stegger, L ^b   Schafers M ^a   Dugas, M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clinical studies; Completeness; Follow up; Hospital information system; Single source information system

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958085168     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18690327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2010-08-RA-0047     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chan KS, Fowles J, Weiner JP. Electronic health records and reliability and validity of quality measures. A review of the literature. Medical Care Research and Review. Forthcoming 2010. doi:10.1177/1077558709359007 PMid:20150441
2. Ammenwerth E, Spötl HP. The time needed for clinical documentation versus direct patient care. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48: 84-91. PMid:19151888
3. Forster M, Bailey C, Brinkhof MW, Graber C, Boulle A, Spohr M et al. Electronic medical record systems, data quality and loss to follow-up: survey of antiretroviral therapy programmes in resource-limited settings. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2008; 86: 939-947. doi:10.2471/BLT.07.049908 PMid:19142294 PMCid:2649575
4. El Emam K, Jonker E, Sampson M, Krleža-Jeri K, Neisa A. The use of electronic data capture tools in clinical trials: Web-survey of 259 Canadian trials. J Med Internet Res 2009; 11(1): e8. doi:10.2196/jmir.1120 PMid:19275984 PMCid:2762772
5. Dugas M, Breil B, Thiemann V, Lechtenbörger J, Vossen G. Single source information system to connect patient care and clinical research. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 150: 61-65. PMid:19745267
6. Kush R, Alschuler L, Ruggeri R, Cassells S, Gupta N, Bain L et al. Implementing single source: the STARBRITE proof-of-concept study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14(5): 662-673. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2157 PMid:17600107 PMCid:1975790
7. Dugas M, Lange M, Berdel BE, Müller-Tidow C. Workflow to improve patient recruitment for clinical trials within hospital informations systems-a case-study. Trials 2008; 9: 2. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-9-2 PMid:18186949 PMCid:2253503
8. Dambro MR, Weiss BD. Assessing the quality of data entry in a computerized medical records system. J Med Syst 1988; 12: 181-187. doi:10.1007/BF00996640 PMid:3171446
9. Hogan WR, Wagner MM. Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997; 5: 342-355.
10. de Lusignan S, van Weel C: The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Family Practice 2006; 23: 253-263. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi106 PMid:16368704
11. Herzberg S, Rahbar K, Stegger L, Schäfers M, Dugas M. Concept and implementation of a single source information system in nuclear medicine for myocardial scintigraphy (SPECT-CT data). Appl Clin Inf 2010; 1: 50-67.
12. AGFA. com [Internet]. Agfa Healthcare; c2010 [updated 2009 Oct 8; cited 2010 Aug 26]. Available from: http://healthcare.agfa.com/.
13. ORACLE. com [Internet]. ORACLE [cited 2010 Aug 26]. Available from: http://www.oracle.com/.
14. SPSS. com [Internet]. Illinois: SPSS, Inc.; c2010 [cited 2010 Aug 26]. Available from: http://www.spss.com/.
15. McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Grant AM, Cook JA et al. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials 2006; 7: 9. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-7-9 PMid:16603070 PMCid:1475627
16. Weiner DL, Butte AJ, Hibberd PL, Fleisher GR. Computerized recruiting for clinical trials in real time. Ann emerg Med 2003; 41: 242-246. doi:10.1067/mem.2003.52 PMid:12548275
17. Embi PJ, Jain A, Clark J, Bizjack S, Hornung R, Harris CM. Effect of a clinical trial alert system on physician participation in trial recruitment. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 2272-2280. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.19.2272 PMid:16246994 PMCid:1343501
18. Welker JA. Implementation of electronic data capture systems: Barriers and solutions. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2007; 28: 229-236. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2007.01.001 PMid:17287151
19. Prokosch HU, Ganslandt T. Perspectives for medical informatics: reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48: 38-44. PMid:19151882
20. Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health record on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12: 505-516. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1700 PMid:15905487 PMCid:1205599
21. CDISC. org [Internet]. Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium; c2010 [cited 2010 Aug 26]. Available from: http://www.cdisc.org/.
22. Gardner RM, Pryor TA, Warner HR: The HELP hospital information system: update 1998. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1999; 54: 169-182. doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(99)00013-1
23. Mosen D, Elliot CG, Egger MJ, Mundorff M, Hopkins J, Patterson R et al. The effect of a computerized reminder system on the prevention of postoperative venous thromoembolism. Chest 2004; 125: 1635-1641. doi:10.1378/chest.125.5.1635 PMid:15136370
24. Barnett GO, Winickoff RN, Morgan MM, Zielstorff RD. A computer-based monitoring system for follow-up of elevated blood pressure. Medical Care 1983; 21:400-409. doi:10.1097/00005650-198304000-00003 PMid:6341724
25. Staes CJ, Evans RS, Rocha BH, Sorensen JB, Huff SM, Arata J et al. Computerized alerts improve outpatient laboratory monitoring of transplant patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15: 324-332. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2608 PMid:18308982 PMCid:2410008
26. Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Donelan K, Rao SR, Ferris TG et al. Use of electronic health records in U.S. Hospitals. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 1628-1638. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0900592 PMid:19321858