Time-Course of Feature-Based Top-Down Control in Saccadic Distractor Effects

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1689-1699

  Born, Sabine ^a   Kerzel, Dirk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Distractor; Latency; Saccade; Time course; Top down

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; OCULOGRAPHY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 83055188691     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024282     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andersen S.K., Müller M.M., Hillyard S.A. Color-selective attention need not be mediated by spatial attention. Journal of Vision 2009, 9:21-27.
2. Ansorge U., Heumann M. Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:937-948.
3. Basso M.A., Wurtz R.H. Modulation of neuronal activity in superior colliculus by changes in target probability. Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 18:7519-7534.
4. Becker S.I., Ansorge U., Horstmann G. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search? Vision Research 2009, 49:1738-1756.
5. Benson V. A comparison of bilateral versus unilateral target and distractor presentation in the remote distractor paradigm. Experimental Psychology 2008, 55:334-341.
6. Bichot N.P., Schall J.D. Effects of similarity and history on neural mechanisms of visual selection. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2:549-554.
7. Bompas A., Sumner P. Sensory sluggishness dissociates saccadic, manual, and perceptual responses: An S-cone study. Journal of Vision 2008, 8:11-13.
8. Bompas A., Sumner P. Oculomotor distraction by signals invisible to the retinotectal and magnocellular pathways. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 102:2387-2395.
9. Born S., Kerzel D. Influence of target and distractor contrast on the remote distractor effect. Vision Research 2008, 48:2805-2816.
10. Born S., Kerzel D. Congruency effects in the remote distractor paradigm: Evidence for top-down modulation. Journal of Vision 2009, 9:1-13.
11. Born S., Kerzel D. Effects of stimulus contrast and temporal delays in saccadic distraction. Vision Research 2011, 51:1163-1172.
12. Carpenter R.H.S., Williams M.L. Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements. Nature 1995, 377:59-62.
13. de Gonzaga Gawryszewski L., Riggio L., Rizzolatti G., Umilta C. Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of " neutral" cues. Neuropsychologia 1987, 25:19-29.
14. Dorris M.C., Munoz D.P. Saccadic probability influences motor preparation signals and time to saccadic initiation. Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 18:7015-7026.
15. Fecteau J.H., Munoz D.P. Salience, relevance, and firing: A priority map for target selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:382-390.
16. Findlay J.M., Walker R. A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:661-674. discussion 674-721.
17. Folk C.L., Remington R. Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:847-858.
18. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:1030-1044.
19. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Wright J.H. The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:317-329.
20. Gibson B.S., Amelio J. Inhibition of return and attentional control settings. Perception and Psychophysics 2000, 62:496-504.
21. Godijn R., Theeuwes J. Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:1039-1054.
22. Jonides J., Mack A. On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit. Psychological Bulletin 1984, 96:29-44.
23. Lévy-Schoen A. Détermination et latence de la réponse oculomotrice à deux stimulus simultanés ou successifs selon leur excentricité relative. L'Année Psychologique 1969, 69:373-392.
24. Ludwig C.J., Gilchrist I.D. Stimulus-driven and goal-driven control over visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:902-912.
25. Ludwig C.J., Gilchrist I.D. Target similarity affects saccade curvature away from irrelevant onsets. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 152:60-69.
26. Ludwig C.J., Gilchrist I.D., McSorley E. The influence of spatial frequency and contrast on saccade latencies. Vision Research 2004, 44:2597-2604.
27. Ludwig C.J., Gilchrist I.D., McSorley E. The remote distractor effect in saccade programming: Channel interactions and lateral inhibition. Vision Research 2005, 45:1177-1190.
28. Maunsell J.H., Treue S. Feature-based attention in visual cortex. Trends in Neurosciences 2006, 29:317-322.
29. McSorley E., Haggard P., Walker R. Time course of oculomotor inhibition revealed by saccade trajectory modulation. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 96:1420-1424.
30. McSorley E., Haggard P., Walker R. The spatial and temporal shape of oculomotor inhibition. Vision Research 2009, 49:608-614.
31. Mulckhuyse M., Van der Stigchel S., Theeuwes J. Early and late modulation of saccade deviations by target distractor similarity. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 102:1451-1458.
32. Mulckhuyse M., van Zoest W., Theeuwes J. Capture of the eyes by relevant and irrelevant onsets. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 186:225-235.
33. Munoz D.P., Fecteau J.H. Vying for dominance: Dynamic interactions control visual fixation and saccadic initiation in the superior colliculus. Progress in Brain Research 2002, 140:3-19.
34. Rolfs M., Vitu F. On the limited role of target onset in the gap task: Support for the motor-preparation hypothesis. Journal of Vision 2007, 7:1-20.
35. Ross L.E., Ross S.M. Saccade latency and warning signals: Stimulus onset, offset, and change as warning events. Perception and Psychophysics 1980, 27:251-257.
36. Saenz M., Buracas G.T., Boynton G.M. Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:631-632.
37. Theeuwes J., Atchley P., Kramer A.F. On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. Attention and performance XVIII 2000, 105-124. MIT Press, Cambridge. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
38. Theeuwes J., Godijn R. Inhibition-of-return and oculomotor interference. Vision Research 2004, 44:1485-1492.
39. Trappenberg T.P., Dorris M.C., Munoz D.P., Klein R.M. A model of saccade initiation based on the competitive integration of exogenous and endogenous signals in the superior colliculus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 13:256-271.
40. Van der Stigchel S. Recent advances in the study of saccade trajectory deviations. Vision Research 2010, 50:1619-1627.
41. Van der Stigchel S., Theeuwes J. Our eyes deviate away from a location where a distractor is expected to appear. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 169:338-349.
42. van Zoest W., Donk M. Goal-driven modulation as a function of time in saccadic target selection. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:1553-1572.
43. van Zoest W., Donk M., Theeuwes J. The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:746-759.
44. Vierck E., Miller J. Electrophysiological correlates of direct selection by color. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:621-631.
45. Walker R., Deubel H., Schneider W.X., Findlay J.M. Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: Evidence for an extended fixation zone. Journal of Neurophysiology 1997, 78:1108-1119.
46. Walker R., Kentridge R.W., Findlay J.M. Independent contributions of the orienting of attention, fixation offset and bilateral stimulation on human saccadic latencies. Experimental Brain Research 1995, 103:294-310.
47. Watson D.G., Humphreys G.W. Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review 1997, 104:90-122.
48. Watson D.G., Humphreys G.W. Visual marking: The effects of irrelevant changes on preview search. Perception and Psychophysics 2005, 67:418-434.
49. White B.J., Gegenfurtner K.R., Kerzel D. Effects of structured nontarget stimuli on saccadic latency. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005, 93:3214-3223.
50. White B.J., Kerzel D., Gegenfurtner K.R. The spatio-temporal tuning of the mechanisms in the control of saccadic eye movements. Vision Research 2006, 46:3886-3897.
51. Wijnen J.G., Ridderinkhof K.R. Response inhibition in motor and oculomotor conflict tasks: Different mechanisms, different dynamics? Brain and Cognition 2007, 63:260-270.