Goal-driven modulation as a function of time in saccadic target selection

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 61, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1553-1572

  Van Zoest, Wieske ^a,b   Donk, Mieke ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dimensions; Eye movements; Goal driven control; Time course; Visual selection

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 51349161733     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210701595555     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496.
2. Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 859-880.
3. Dosher, B. A. (1979). Empirical approaches to-information-processing - speed-accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction-time - reply. Acta Psychologica, 43, 347-359.
4. Dosher, B., Han, S. M., & Lu, Z. L. (2000). Time course of asymmetric visual search. Perception, 29, 12-13.
5. Duncan, J. (1995). Target and nontarget grouping in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 117-120.
6. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
7. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 578-588.
8. Findlay, J. M. (1997). Saccade target selection during visual search. Vision Research, 37, 617-631.
9. Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (1998). Eye guidance and visual search. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading, driving, and scene perception (pp. 295-312). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
10. Folk, C. M., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
11. Found, A., & Müller, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a "dimension- weighting" account. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 88-101.
12. Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2002). Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1039-1054.
13. Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36, 791-804.
14. Joseph, J. S., Chun, M. M., & Nakayama, K. (1997). Attentional requirements in a "preattentive" feature search task. Nature, 387, 805-807.
15. Kim, M. S., & Cave, K. R. (1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1009-1023.
16. Krummenacher, J., Müller, H. J., & Heller, D. (2001). Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Evidence for parallel-coactive processing of dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 901-917.
17. Krummenacher, J., Müller, H. J., & Heller, D. (2002). Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Parallel-coactive processing of dimensions is location specific. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1303-1322.
18. Ludwig, C. J. H., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2002). Stimulus-driven and goal-driven control over visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 902-912.
19. Ludwig, C. J. H., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003a). Goal-driven modulation of oculomotor capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1243-1251.
20. Ludwig, C. J. H., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003b). Target similarity affects saccade curvature away from irrelevant onsets. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 60-69.
21. McElree, B., & Carrasco, M. (1999). The temporal dynamics of visual search: Evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1517-1539.
22. McSorley, E., Haggard, P., & Walker, R. (2006). Time course of oculomotor inhibition revealed by saccade trajectory modulation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 1420-1424.
23. Motter, B. C., & Belky, E. J. (1998). The guidance of eye movements during active visual search. Vision Research, 38, 1805-1815.
24. Müller, H. J., Heller, D., & Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1-17.
25. Müller, H. J., & Krummenacher, J. (2006). Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective? Visual Cognition, 14, 490-513.
26. Müller, H. J., Krummenacher, J., & Heller, D. (2004). Dimension-specific inter-trial facilitation in visual search for pop-out targets: Evidence for a top-down modulable visual short-term memory effect. Visual Cognition, 11, 577-602.
27. Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-350.
28. Müller, H. J., Reimann, B., & Krummenacher, J. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1021-1035.
29. Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29, 1631-1647.
30. Nothdurft, H. C. (2002). Attention shifts to salient targets. Vision Research, 42, 2187-1306.
31. Nothdurft, H. C. (2006). Salience and target selection in visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 514-542.
32. Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 650-657.
33. Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1985). "Where" and "what" in vision. Science, 228, 1217-1219.
34. Schouten, J. F., & Bekker, J. A. M. (1967). Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychologica, 27, 143-153.
35. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
36. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (1999). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1595-1608.
37. Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Houghton, G. (2000). Behavioral consequences of selection from neural population codes. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention & performance XVII. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
39. Treisman, A. M., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 451-478.
40. Tse, P. U., Sheinberg, D. L., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Fixational eye movements are not affected by abrupt onsets that capture attention. Vision Research, 42, 1663-1669.
41. van Zoest, W., & Donk, M. (2004). Bottom-up and top-down control in visual search. Perception, 33, 927-937.
42. van Zoest, W., & Donk, M. (2005). The effects of salience on saccadic target selection. Visual Cognition, 2, 353-375.
43. van Zoest, W., & Donk, M. (2006). Saccadic target selection as a function of time. Spatial Vision, 19, 61-76.
44. van Zoest, W., Donk, M.,&Theeuwes,J.(2004). The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 746-759.
45. Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67-85.
46. Williams, D. E., & Reingold, E. M. (2001). Preattentive guidance of eye movements during triple conjunction search tasks: The effects of feature discriminability and saccadic amplitude. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 476-488.
47. Williams, L. G. (1967). The effects of target specification on objects fixated during visual search. Acta Psychologica, 27, 355-360.
48. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0. A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
49. Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 483-502.
50. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.
51. Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). Opinion: What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 495-501.
52. Yantis, S. (2005). How visual salience wins the battle for awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 975-977.
53. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 121-134.