Commercial funding in academe: Examining the correlates of faculty's use of industrial and business funding for academic work

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 775-799

  Szelényi, Katalin ^a   Goldberg, Richard A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b Labor Litigation Practice   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 83055186799     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: 15384640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2011.11777227     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson, M. S. (2001). The complex relations between the academy and industry: Views from the literature. The Journal of Higher Education, 72, 226-246.
2. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2007). The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: Demographics or opportunities? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4), 599-623.
3. Behrens, T. R., & Gray, D. O. (2001). Unintended consequences of cooperative research: Impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome. Research Policy, 30, 179-199.
4. Blumenthal, D. (2003). Academic-industrial relationships in the life sciences. The New England Journal of Medicine, 349(25), 2452-2459.
5. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Anderson, M. S., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1997). Withholding research results in academic life science: Evidence from a national survey of faculty. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(15), 1224-1228.
6. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1996). Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. The New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23), 1734-1739.
7. Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M., Louis, K. S., Stoto, M. A., & Wise, D. (1986). Universityindustry research relationships in biotechnology: Implications for the university. Science, 232(4756), 1361-1366.
8. Britt, R. (2008). Universities report continued decline in real federal S&E R&D funding in FY 2007. Info Brief. NSF 08-320. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved February 5, 2010, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf08320/nsf08320.pdf
9. Campbell, E. G., Louis, K. S., & Blumenthal, D. (1998). Looking a gift horse in the mouth: Corporate gifts supporting life sciences research. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(13), 995-999.
10. Campbell, E. G., Powers, J. B., Blumenthal, D., & Biles, B. (2004). Inside the triple helix: Technology transfer and commercialization in the life sciences. Health Affairs, 23(1), 64-76.
11. Campbell, E. G., Weissman, J. S., Ehringhaus, S., Rao, S. R., Moy, B., Feibelmann, S., & Dorr Goold, S. (2007). Institutional academic-industry relationships. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(15), 1779-1786.
12. Campbell, T. I. D, & Slaughter S. (1999). Faculty and administrators' attitudes toward potential conflicts of interest, commitment, and equity in university-industry relationships. The Journal of Higher Education, 70, 309-352.
13. Crespo, M., & Dridi, H. (2007). Intensification of university-industry relationships and its impact on academic research. Higher Education, 54(1), 61-84.
14. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., & Healey, P. (Eds.). (1998). Capitalizing knowledge: New intersections of industry and academia. Albany: State University of New York Press.
15. Gould, E. (2003). The university in a corporate culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Gumport, P. J. (2002). Universities and knowledge: Restructuring the city of intellect. In S. Brint (Ed.), The future of the city of intellect: The changing American university (pp. 47-81). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17. Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38, 922-935.
18. Kenney, M., & Goe, W. R. (2004). The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: A comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford. Research Policy, 33, 691-707.
19. Kirp, D. L. (2003). Shakespeare, Einstein, and the bottom line: The marketing of higher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Lee, J. J., & Rhoads, R. A. (2004). Faculty entrepreneurialism and the challenge to undergraduate education at research universities. Research in Higher Education, 45(7), 739-760.
21. Lindholm, J. A., Szelényi, K., Hurtado, S, & Korn, W. (2005). The American college teacher: National norms for the 2004-2005 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
22. Louis, K. S., & Anderson, M. S. (1998). The changing context of science and universityindustry relations. In H. Etzkowitz, A. Webster, & P. Healey (Eds.), Capitalizing knowledge: New intersections of industry and academia (pp. 73-91). Albany: State University of New York Press.
23. Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E., & Stoto, M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110-131.
24. Louis, K. S., Holdsworth, J. M., Anderson, M. S., & Campbell, E. G. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The effects of work-group size and organizational climate. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 311-336.
25. Mars, M. M., & Metcalfe, A. S. (2009). The entrepreneurial domains of American higher education. ASHE -Higher Education Report, 34(5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Powers, J. B. (2004). R&D funding sources and university technology transfer: What is stimulating universities to be more entrepreneurial? Research in Higher Education, 45(1), 1-23.
27. Sismondo, S. (2008a). How pharmaceutical industry funding affects trial outcomes: Causal structures and responses. Social Science & Medicine, 66(9), 1909-1914.
28. Sismondo, S. (2008b). Pharmaceutical company funding and its consequences: A qualitative systematic review. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 29, 109-113.
29. Slaughter, S., Archerd, C. J., & Campbell, T. I. D. (2004). Boundaries and quandaries: How professors negotiate market relations. The Review of Higher Education, 28(1), 129-165.
30. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
31. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (1996). The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21(3), 303-339.
32. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Thornton, P. H. (1999). The sociology of entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 19-46.
34. Washburn, J. (2005). University, Inc.: The corporate corruption of American higher education. New York: Basic Books.
35. Ylijoki, O-H. (2003). Entangled in academic capitalism? A case-study on changing ideals and practices of university research. Higher Education, 45(3), 307-335.