Impairment of Recovery From Incentive Downshift After Lesions of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex: Emotional or Cognitive Deficits?

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 125, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 988-995

  Ortega, Leonardo A ^a   Uhelski, Megan ^b   Fuchs, Perry N ^b   Papini, Mauricio R ^a  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Anterior cingulate cortex; Incentive contrast; Psychological pain

Indexed keywords

SUCROSE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX LESION; BRAIN TISSUE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONSUMMATORY SUCCESSIVE NEGATIVE CONTRAST SITUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPING BEHAVIOR; EMOTIONAL DISORDER; EMOTIONALITY; LEARNING; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROLOGICAL AND SENSORIAL PROCEDURES; NONHUMAN; RAT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; COGNITION DISORDERS; EMOTIONS; GYRUS CINGULI; MALE; MOTIVATION; NERVE NET; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RATS, LONG-EVANS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 83055184733     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: 19390084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0025769     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Amsel A. Frustration theory 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511665561.
2. Becker H.C., Jarvis M.F., Wagner G.C., Flaherty C.F. Medial and lateral amygdalectomy differentially influences consummatory negative contrast. Physiology & Behavior 1984, 33:707-712. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90035-0.
3. Dachowski L., Brazier M.M. Consummatory incentive contrast: Experimental design relationships and deprivation effects. Current topics in animal learning: Brain, emotion, and cognition 1991, 245-270. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. L. Dachowski, C.F. Flaherty (Eds.).
4. Daniel A.M., Ortega L.A., Papini M.R. Role of the opioid system in incentive downshift situations. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 2009, 92:439-450. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2009.06.003.
5. Donahue R.R., LaGraize S.C., Fuchs P.N. Electrolytic lesion of the anterior cingulate cortex decreases inflammatory, but not neuropathic nociceptive behavior in rats. Brain Research 2001, 897:131-138. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02103-5.
6. Eisenberger N.I., Lieberman M.D. Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.010.
7. Flaherty C.F. Effect of anxiolytics and antidepressants on extinction and negative contrast. Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1990, 46:309-320. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(90)90097-L.
8. Flaherty C.F. Incentive contrast and selected animal models of anxiety. Current topics in animal learning: Brain, emotion, and cognition 1991, 207-243. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. L. Dachowski, C.F. Flaherty (Eds.).
9. Flaherty C.F. Incentive relativity 1996, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
10. Flaherty C.F., Coppotelli C., Hsu D., Otto T. Excitotoxic lesions of the hippocampus disrupt runway but not consummatory contrast. Behavioural Brain Research 1998, 93:1-9. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(97)00138-1.
11. Flaherty C.F., Rowan G.A., Emerich D.F., Walsh T.J. Effects of intrahippocampal administration of colchicines on incentive contrast and on radial maze performance. Behavioral Neuroscience 1989, 103:319-328. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.103.2.319.
12. Frey S., Morris R., Petrides M. A neuroanatomical method to assess the integrity of fibers of passage following ibotenate-induced damage to the central nervous system. Neuroscience Research 1997, 28:285-288. doi: 10.1016/S0168-0102(97)00048-5.
13. Genn R.F., Ahn S., Phillips A.G. Attenuated dopamine efflux in the rat nucleus accumbens during successive negative contrast. Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 118:869-873. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.869.
14. Gray J.A. The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system 1982, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
15. Grigson P.S., Spector A.C., Norgren R. Lesions of the pontine parabrachial nuclei eliminate successive negative contrast effects in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience 1994, 108:714-723. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.108.4.714.
16. Gurowitz E.M., Rosen A.J., Tessel R.E. Incentive shift performance in cingulectomized rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1970, 70:476-481. doi: 10.1037/h0028702.
17. Hajnal A., Norgren R. Taste pathways that mediate accumbens dopamine release by sapid sucrose. Physiology & Behavior 2005, 84:363-369. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.12.014.
18. Jones L.M., Fontanini A., Katz D.B. Gustatory processing: A dynamic systems approach. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2006, 16:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.06.011.
19. LaGraize S.C., Labuda C.J., Rutledge M.A., Jackson R.L., Fuchs P.N. Differential effect of anterior cingulate cortex lesion on mechanical hypersensitivity and escape/avoidance behavior in an animal model of neuropathic pain. Experimental Neurology 2004, 188:139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.04.003.
20. Leszczuk M.H., Flaherty C.F. Lesions of nucleus accumbens reduce instrumental but not consummatory negative contrast in rats. Behavioural Brain Research 2000, 116:61-79. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00265-5.
21. Lin J., Roman C., Reilly S. Insular cortex and consummatory successive negative contrast in the rat. Behavioral Neuroscience 2009, 123:810-814. doi: 10.1037/a0016460.
22. Mansour A., Fox C.A., Akil H., Watson S.J. Opioid-receptors mRNA expression in the rat CNS: Anatomical and functional implications. Trends in Neurosciences 1995, 18:22-29. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93946-U.
23. McKee B.L., Kelley A.E., Moser H.R., Andrzejewki M.E. Operant learning requires NMDA-receptor activation in the anterior cingulate cortex and dorsomedial striatum, but not in the orbitofrontal cortex. Behavioral Neuroscience 2010, 124:500-509. doi: 10.1037/a0020270.
24. Mustaca A.E., Papini M.R. Consummatory successive negative contrast induces hypoalgesia. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 2005, 18:255-262.
25. Newman L.A., McGaughy J. Attentional effects of lesions to the anterior cingulate cortex: How prior reinforcement influences distractibility. Behavioral Neuroscience 2011, 125:360-371. doi: 10.1037/a0023250.
26. Norris J.N., Daniel A.M., Papini M.R. Spontaneous recovery of consummatory behavior, but not of consummatory successive negative contrast. Learning and Motivation 2008, 39:296-312. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2008.04.001.
27. Ortega L.A., Daniel A.M., Davis J.B., Fuchs P.N., Papini M.R. Peripheral pain enhances the effects of incentive downshifts. Learning and Motivation 2011, 42:203-209. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2011.03.003.
28. Papini M.R. Comparative psychology of surprising nonreward. Brain, behavior, and evolution 2003, 62:83-95. doi: 10.1159/000072439.
29. Papini M.R. Role of opioid receptors in incentive contrast. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 2009, 22:170-187.
30. Papini M.R., Dudley R.T. Consequences of surprising reward omissions. Review of General Psychology 1997, 1:175-197. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.175.
31. Papini M.R., Wood M., Daniel A.M., Norris J.N. Reward loss as psychological pain. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy 2006, 6:189-213.
32. Paxinos G., Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates 1998, Academic Press, New York, NY. 4th ed.
33. Paxinos G., Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates 2007, Academic Press, New York, NY. 6th ed.
34. Pecoraro N., Dallman M.F. c-Fos after incentive shifts: Expectancy, incredulity, and recovery. Behavioral Neuroscience 2005, 119:366-387. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.119.2.366.
35. Pecoraro N., de Jong H., Ginsberg A.B., Dallman M.F. Lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex enhance the early phase of psychogenic fever to unexpected sucrose concentration reductions, promote recovery from negative contrast and enhance spontaneous recovery of sucrose-entrained anticipatory activity. Neuroscience 2008, 153:901-917. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.03.043.
36. Pellegrini S., Wood M., Daniel A.M., Papini M.R. Opioid receptors modulate recovery from consummatory successive negative contrast. Behavioural Brain Research 2005, 164:239-249. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.06.035.
37. Reilly S., Trifunovic R. Gustatory thalamus lesions eliminate successive negative contrast. Behavioral Neuroscience 1999, 113:1242-1248. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.113.6.1242.
38. Sastre A., Reilly S. Excitotoxic lesions of the gustatory thalamus eliminate consummatory but not instrumental successive negative contrast in rats. Behavioural Brain Research 2006, 170:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.01.026.
39. Tabuchi E., Yokawa T., Mallick H., Inubushi T., Kondoh T., Ono T., Torii K. Spatio-temporal dynamics of brain activated regions during drinking behavior in rats. Brain Research 2002, 951:270-279. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)03173-6.
40. Travers J.B., Dinardo L.A., Karimnamazi H. Motor and premotor mechanisms of licking. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 1997, 21:631-647. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(96)00045-0.
41. Vogt B.A., Wiley R.G., Jensen E.L. Localization of mu and delta opioid receptors to anterior cingulate afferents and projection neurons and input/output model of mu regulation. Experimental Neurology 1995, 135:83-92. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1995.1069.
42. Vogt L.J., Sim-Selley L.J., Childers S.R., Wiley R.G., Vogt B.A. Colocalization of mu-opioid receptors and activated G-proteins in rat cingulate cortex. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 2001, 299:840-848.
43. Wood M., Daniel A.M., Papini M.A. Selective effects of the opioid receptor agonist DPDPE on consummatory successive negative contrast. Behavioral Neuroscience 2005, 119:446-454. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.119.2.446.
44. Wood M., Norris J.N., Daniel A.M., Papini M.R. Trial-selective effects of U50,488H, a kappa-opioid receptor agonist, on consummatory successive negative contrast. Behavioural Brain Research 2008, 193:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.04.016.