EXTUBATE: A randomised controlled trial of nasal biphasic positive airway pressure vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure following extubation in infants less than 30 weeks' gestation: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Trials

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Victor, Suresh ^a  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biphasic continuous positive airway pressure; Clinical trials; Continuous positive airway pressure; Humans; Neonatal intensive care; Newborn; Preterm birth infant; Randomized

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

APNEA; ARTICLE; ASSISTED VENTILATION; BLOOD GAS; BRADYCARDIA; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTUBATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NASAL BIPHASIC POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; NEWBORN; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UNITED KINGDOM; VENTILATOR; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; GESTATIONAL AGE; NEONATAL RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME;

AIRWAY EXTUBATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN;

EID: 83055181918     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-257     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ. Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003,
2. Thomson MA, Yoder BA, Winter VT, Martin H, Catland D, Siler-Khodr TM, Coalson JJ. Treatment of immature baboons for 28 days with early nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004, 169:1054-1062. 10.1164/rccm.200309-1276OC, 14962819.
3. Booth C, Premkumar MH, Yannoulis A, Thomson M, Harrison M, Edwards AD. Sustainable use of continuous positive airway pressure in extremely preterm infants during the first week after delivery. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006, 91:F398-F402. 10.1136/adc.2005.092478, 2672749, 16820391.
4. Davis PG, Lemyre B, Paoli AG. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001,
5. Aghai ZH, Saslow JG, Nakhla T, Amendolia B, Longo D, Kemble N, Kaki S, Sutsko R, Saslow JG, Stahl GE. Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) decreases work of breathing (WOB) in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). Pediatr Pulmonol 2006, 41:875-881. 10.1002/ppul.20461, 16850439.
6. Migliori C, Motta M, Angeli A, Chirico G. Nasal bilevel vs. continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol 2005, 40:426-430. 10.1002/ppul.20276, 16155882.
7. Lista G, Casoldi F, Fontana P, Daniele I, Cavigioli F, Rossi S, Manusco D, Reali R. Nasal CPAP versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2010, 95(2):F85-F89. 10.1136/adc.2009.169219, 19948523.
8. Moa G, Nilsson K, Zetterstrom H, Jonsson LO. A new device for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the newborn: an experimental study. Crit Care Med 1988, 16:1238-1242. 10.1097/00003246-198812000-00013, 3056654.
9. Courtney SE, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Pandit PB, Habib RH. Lung recruitment and breathing pattern during variable versus continuous flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: an evaluation of three devices. Pediatrics 2001, 107:304-308. 10.1542/peds.107.2.304, 11158463.
10. Pandit PB, Courtney SE, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Habib RH. Work of breathing during constant- and variable-flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates. Pediatrics 2001, 108:682-685. 10.1542/peds.108.3.682, 11533336.