The challenges and benefits of using participant observation to understand the social interaction of adults with intellectual disabilities

AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 267-278

  Johnson, Hilary ^a   Douglas, Jacinta ^b   Bigby, Christine ^b   Iacono, Teresa ^b  

^a Australia and the Communication Resource Centre   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adult; Interaction; Participant observation; Severe intellectual disability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COMMUNICATION AND INTERACTION; COMPLEX COMMUNICATION NEEDS; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; INTERACTION; OBSERVATION METHOD; OBSERVATIONAL DATA; PARTICIPANT OBSERVATIONS; RESEARCH METHODS; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; SOCIAL NETWORKS;

COMMUNICATION; RESEARCH;

HANDICAPPED PERSONS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS; COMMUNICATION DISORDERS; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 82955247073     PISSN: 07434618     EISSN: 14773848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/07434618.2011.587831     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abudarham, S., & Hurd, A. (Eds.). (2002). Management of communication needs in people with learning disability. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd.
2. Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1994). Observational techniques. In N. K.,Denzin & Y. S., Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research(pp. 377-392). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.
3. Angrosino, M. V. (2004). Participant observation and research onintellectual disability. In E., Emerson, C., Hatton, T., Thompson,& T. R., Parmenter (Eds.), The international handbook of appliedresearch in intellectual disabilities (pp. 161-176). Chichester: JohnWiley & Sons.
4. Antaki, C. (1988). Analysing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods. London: Sage.
5. Antaki, C., Finlay, W. M. L., & Walton, C. (2007). Conversationalshaping: Staff members' solicitation of talk from people withan intellectual impairment. Qualitative Health Research, 17,1403-1414. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308950 (Pubitemid 350130662)
6. Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identities in talk. London: Sage Publications.
7. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Bloom, L., & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and languagedisorder. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Bloomberg, K., West, D., & Iacono, T. (2003). PICTURE IT: anevaluation of a training program for carers of adults with severeand multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and DevelopmentalDisability, 28, 260-282. doi: 10.1080/1366825031000150964 (Pubitemid 37040516)
10. Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. J. (1998). The social construction of humanness: Relationships with people with severe retardation. InS., Taylor & R., Bogdan (Eds.), Introduction to qualitative researchmethods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed., pp. 242-258). NewYork: NY: John Wiley & Sons.
11. Calculator, S. (1988). Exploring the language of adults withmental retardation. In S., Calculator & J., Bedrosian (Eds.),Communication assessment and intervention for adults withmental retardation (pp. 95-106). San Diego, CA: College-HillPress.
12. Cameron, L., & Murphy, J. (2007). Obtaining consent to participatein research: The issues involved in including people with a range of learning and communication disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 113-120. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2006.00404
13. Cartwright, J., & Limandri, B. (1997). The challenge of multipleroles in the qualitative clinician researcher-participant clientrelationship. Qualitative Health Research, 7, 223-235. doi: 10.1177/104973239700700204 (Pubitemid 127659505)
14. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practicalguide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
15. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Dennis, R. (2002). Nonverbal narratives: Listening to people withsevere intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons withSevere Disabilities, 27, 239-249. doi: 10.2511/rpsd.27.4.239 (Pubitemid 36260014)
17. Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographicpractices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The disciplineand practice of qualitative research. In N. K., Denzin & Y. S.,Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.,pp. 1-32.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Dolloghan, C., & Miller, J. (1986). Observational methods in thestudy of communicative competence. In R., Schiefelbusch (Ed.),Language competence: Assessment and intervention (pp. 99-129).London: Taylor & Francis.
20. Duck, S., West, L., & Acitelli, L. K. (1997). Sewing the field: The tapestry of relationships in life and research. In B. M.,Montgomery & S., Duck (Eds.), Handbook of Personal relationships: Theory research and intervention (2nd ed., pp. 1-23). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
21. Ely, M., Vinz, M., Anzul, M., & Downing, M. (Eds.). (1997). Onwriting qualitative research: Living by words. London: FalmerPress.
22. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). In the field: Participating, observing, and jotting notes. In R. M., Emerson,R. I., Fretz, & L. L., Shaw (Eds.), Writing ethnographic fieldnotes(pp. 17-38). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23. Fetterman, D. M. (1989). Ethnography: Step by step. NewburyPark, CA: Sage.
24. Finlay, W., Antaki, C., & Walton, C. (2007). On not being noticed: Intellectual disabilities and the nonvocal register. Intellectualand Developmental Disabilities, 45, 227-245. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556
25. Fischer, K. W., & Corrigan, R. (1981). A skill approach to languagedevelopment. In R. E., Stark (Ed.), Language behavior in infancyand early childhood (pp. 245-273). New York: Elsevier NorthHolland.
26. Gold, R. L. (1958). Roles in sociological field observations. SocialForces, 36, 217-223.
27. Golden, J., & Reese, M. (1996). Focus on communication: Improving Interaction between staff and residents who havesevere or pr of ound mental retardation. Research in DevelopmentalDisabilities, 17, 363-382. (Pubitemid 26315007)
28. Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative methods forhealth research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
29. Griffin, T., & Balandin, S. (2004). Ethical research involvingpeople with intellectual disabilities. In E., Emerson, C., Hatton,T., Thompson, & T. R., Parmenter (Eds.), The internationalhandbook of applied research in intellectual disabilities (pp. 61-82).Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
30. Grove, N., & Walker, M. (1990). The Makaton vocabulary: Usingmanual signs and graphic symbols to develop interpersonalcommunication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6,15-28. doi: 10.1080/07434619012331275284
31. Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and"ethically important moments" in research. Qualitative Inquiry,10, 261-280. doi: 10.1177/1077800403262360
32. Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations inthe development of language. London: Edward Arnold.
33. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles inpractice (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
34. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles inpractice (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
35. Hubert, J., & Hollins, S. (2006). Men with severe learningdisabilities and challenging behaviour in long-stay hospital care.British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 70-74. (Pubitemid 43021930)
36. Iacono, T., & Murray, V. (2003). Issues of informed consent inconducting medical research involving people with intellectualdisability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16,41-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-3148.2003.00141 (Pubitemid 38422523)
37. Johnson, H., Douglas, J., Bigby, C., & Iacono, T. (2010). The pearlin the middle: A case study of social interactions in an individualwith a severe intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual andDevelopmental Disability, 35, 175-186. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2010.501026
38. Johnston, T. (Ed.). (2010). Signs of Australia: A new dictionary of Auslan (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: North Rocks Press.
39. Jorgensen, D. L. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology forhuman studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
40. Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the vulnerable. London: SagePublications.
41. Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative research methods (3rd ed.).Sydney: Oxford University Press.
42. Markova, I., Jahoda, A., Carttermole, M., & Woodward, D. (1992).Living in hospital and hostel: the pattern of interaction of peoplewith learning difficulties. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,36, 115-127.
43. McConkey, R., Morris, I., & Purcell, M. (1999). Communicationsbetween staff and adults with intellectual disabilities in naturallyoccurring settings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43,194-205. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1999.00191 (Pubitemid 29271628)
44. McCord, M. S., & Soto, G. (2004). Perceptions of AAC: Anethnographic investigation of Mexican-American families.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 209-227. doi: 10.1080/07434610400005648 (Pubitemid 40072074)
45. McLean, L. K., Brady, N. C., & McLean, J. E. (1996). Reportedcommunication abilities of individuals with severe mentalretardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100,580-591. (Pubitemid 26182918)
46. McLean, L. K., & McLean, J. E. (1993). Communicationintervention for adults with severe mental retardation. Topics inLanguage Disorders, 13, 47-60.
47. Morse, J. M., & Richards, L. (2002). Readme first for a user's guide toqualitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Newton, J. S., Olson, D., & Horner, R. H. (1995). Factorscontributing to the stability of social relationships betweenindividuals with intellectual disabilities and other communitymembers. Mental Retardation, 33, 383-393. (Pubitemid 26003416)
49. Nightingale, D. J., & Cromby, J. (1999). Social constructionistpsychology: A critical analysis of theory and practice. Buckingham,UK: Open University Press.
50. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Prior, M., Minnes, P., Coyne, T., Golding, B., Hendy, J., &McGillivary, J. (1979). Verbal interactions between staff andresidents in an institution for the young mentally retarded.Mental Retardation, 17, 65-69. (Pubitemid 9162202)
52. Schensul, S. L., Schensul, J. J., & LeCompte, M. D. (1999). Essentialethnographic methods: Observations, interviews and questionnaires. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira.
53. Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage.
54. Simmons-Mackie, N. N., & Damico, J. S. (1996). The contribution of discourse markers to communicative competence in aphasia.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 37-43.
55. Stalker, K. (1998). Some ethical and methodological issues inresearch with people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 13, 5-19. doi: 10.1080/09687599826885 (Pubitemid 128029441)
56. Stuart, S. (2000). Understanding the storytelling of older adults forAAC system design. Augmentative and Alternative Communication,16, 1-12. doi: 10.1080/07434610012331278864
57. Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1989). On accepting relationshipsbetween people with mental retardation and non-disabled people: Towards an understanding of acceptance. Disability, Handicap & Society, 4, 21-36. doi: 10.1080/02674648966780021
58. Werner, O., & Schoepfle, G. H. M. (1987). Systematic fieldwork.Foundations of ethnography and interviewing (Vol. 1). NewburyPark, CA: Sage.
59. Zilber, D., Shaddock, A., Dowse, L., Rawlings, M., Guggenheimer,S., & Browne, F. (1994). Communication patterns in services forpeople with severe intellectual disabilities: Function, form andresponsiveness. Australian Journal of Communication Disorders,22, 85-98.