A new kind of organizational behavior

Research in Multi-Level Issues

Volumn 8, Issue , 2009, Pages 13-60

  Yammarino, Francis J ^a   Dansereau, Fred ^b  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82955234833     PISSN: 14759144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S1475-9144(2009)0000008001     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Alutto, J. A. (1968). Role propositions and the analysis of organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
2. Baba, M. L., Gluesing, J., Ratner, H., & Wagner, K. H. (2004). The contexts of knowing: Natural history of a globally distributed team. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(5), 547-587.
3. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.
4. Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32-40.
5. Behling, O. (1978). Some problems in the philosophy of science of organizations. Academy of Management Review, 3, 193-201.
6. Biddle, B. J. (1979). Role theory: Expectations, identities and behavior. New York: Academic Press.
7. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
8. Blau, P. M. (1974). On the nature of organizations. New York: Wiley.
9. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2001). Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 195-202.
10. Chaitin, G. (2006). The limits of reason. Scientific American, 294(3), 74-81.
11. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
12. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874-900.
13. Dansereau, F. (1995). A dyadic approach to leadership: Creating and nurturing this approach under fire. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 479-490 .
14. Dansereau, F., Alutto, J. A., & Yammarino, F. J. (1984). Theory testing in organizational behavior: The varient approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Dansereau, F., Cho, J., & Yammarino, F. J. (2006). Avoiding the "fallacy of the wrong level'': A within and between analysis (WABA) approach. Group and Organization Manage-ment, 31, 536-577.
16. Dansereau, F., & Yammarino, F. J. (Eds). (1998a). Leadership: The multiple-level approaches (Part A: Classical and new wave). Vol. 24 of Monographs in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
17. Dansereau, F., & Yammarino, F. J. (Eds). (1998b). Leadership: The multiple-level approaches (Part B: Contemporary and alternative). Vol. 24 of Monographs in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
18. Dansereau, F., & Yammarino, F. J. (2000). Within and between analysis: The varient paradigm as an underlying approach to theory building and testing. In: K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds), Multi-level theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 425-466). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Dansereau, F., & Yammarino, F. J. (Eds). (2003). Multi-level issues in organizational behavior and strategy. Vol. 2 of Research in Multi-Level Issues. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
20. Dansereau, F., & Yammarino, F. J. (Eds). (2005). Multi-level issues in strategy and methods. Vol. 4 of Research in Multi-Level Issues. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
21. Dansereau, F., & Yammarino, F. J. (2006). Is more discussion about levels of analysis really necessary? When is such discussion sufficient? Leadership Quarterly, 17, 537-552.
22. Dansereau, F., & Yammarino, F. J. (Eds). (2007). Multi-level issues in organizations and time. Vol. 6 of Research in Multi-Level Issues. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
23. Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F. J., & Kohles, J. (1999). Multiple levels of analysis from a longitudinal perspective: Some implications for theory building. Academy of Management Review, 24, 346-357.
24. Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F. J., Markham, S. E., Alutto, J. A., Newman, J., Dumas, M., et al. (1995). Individualized leadership: A new multiple-level approach. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 413-450.
25. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362.
26. Feldman, D. C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47-53.
27. Firebaugh, G. (1980). Groups as contexts and frog ponds. In: K. H. Roberts & L. Burstein (Eds), New directions for methodology of social and behavioral research: Issues in aggregation (pp. 43-52). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28. Gibson, C. (2001). From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: Cycles of collective cognition in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 145-160.
29. Gibson, C. B. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 138-152.
30. Gibson, C. B., Randel, A. E., & Earley, P. C. (2000). Understanding group efficacy: An empirical test of multiple assessment methods. Group and Organization Management, 25(1), 67-96.
31. Glick, W. H., & Roberts, K. H. (1984). Hypothesized interdependence, assumed independence. Academy of Management Review, 9, 722-735.
32. Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
33. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
34. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606.
35. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace.
36. House, R., Rousseau, D. M., & Thomas-Hunt, M. (1995). The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. In: B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 71-114). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
37. Hrebiniak, L. G., & Alutto, J. A. (1972). Personal and role-related factors in the development of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 555-573.
38. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
39. Kelley, H. H., & Thibault, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relationships: A theory ofinterdependence. New York: Wiley.
40. Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19, 195-229.
41. Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403-437.
42. Kornhauser, W. (1962). Scientists in industry: Conflict and accommodation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
43. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77-124.
44. Lerner, D. (Ed.) (1963). Parts and wholes. New York: Free Parkham.
45. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
46. Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-Analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
47. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the "side-bet theory'' of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372-378.
48. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.
49. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 89, 991-1007.
51. Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 299-326.
52. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-Analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52.
53. Miller, J. G. (1978). Living systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.
54. Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 89-106.
55. Mumford, M. D., Dansereau, F., & Yammarino, F. J. (2000). Followers, motivations, and levels of analysis: The case of individualized leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 313-340.
56. Naughton, T. J. (1982). An empirical examination of a theory of option-cutting and commitment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
57. Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
58. Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
59. Roberts, K. H., Hulin, C. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1978). Developing an interdisciplinary science of organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
60. Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351-357.
61. Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 1-37.
62. Shaw, M. R. (1976). Group dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
63. Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27-44.
64. Taggar, S., & Ellis, R. (2007). The role of leaders in shaping formal team norms. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 105-120.
65. Thibault, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
66. Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
67. Wallis, N. C. (1999). Follow the leader: Understanding the initiation of individualized leadership from follower and leader perspectives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Fielding Institute.
68. Weber, M. (1924/1947). The theory of social and economic organization (T. Parsons, translator). New York: Free Press.
69. Wolfram, S. (2002). A new kind of science. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media.
70. Yammarino, F. J. (1994). A conceptual-empirical approach for testing meso and multi-level theories. In: H. L. Tosi (Ed.), Extensions of the environment/organization/person model (pp. 20-50). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
71. Yammarino, F. J. (1995). Dyadic leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 2(4), 50-74.
72. Yammarino, F. J. (1996). Group leadership: A levels of analysis perspective. In: M. A. West (Ed.), The handbook of work group psychology (pp. 189-224). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
73. Yammarino, F. J. (1998). Multivariate aspects of the varient/WABA approach: A discussion and leadership illustration. Leadership Quarterly, 9, 203-227.
74. Yammarino, F. J. (2003). Modern data analytic techniques for multisource feedback. Organizational Research Methods, 6(1), 6-14.
75. Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1991). Person and situation views of leadership: A multiple levels of analysis approach. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 121-139.
76. Yammarino, F. J., & Dansereau, F. (Eds). (2002a). The many faces of multi-level issues. Vol. 1 of Research in Multi-Level Issues. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
77. Yammarino, F. J., & Dansereau, F. (2002b). Individualized leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies, 9, 90-99.
78. Yammarino, F. J., & Dansereau, F. (Eds). (2004). Multi-level issues in organizational behavior and processes. Vol. 3 of Research in Multi-Level Issues. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
79. Yammarino, F. J., & Dansereau, F. (Eds). (2006). Multi-level issues in social systems. Vol. 5 of Research in Multi-Level Issues. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
80. Yammarino, F. J., Dansereau, F., & Kennedy, C. (2001). A multiple-level multidimensional approach to leadership: Viewing leadership through an elephant's eye. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 149-163.
81. Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Chun, J. U., & Dansereau, F. (2005). Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-The-science review. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 879-919.
82. Yammarino, F. J., & Dubinsky, A. J. (1992). Superior-subordinate relationships: A multiple levels of analysis approach. Human Relations, 45, 575-600.
83. Yammarino, F. J., & Markham, S. E. (1992). On the application of within and between analysis: Are absence and affect really group-based phenomena? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 168-176 (correction, 77, 426).
84. Yammarino, F. J., & Naughton, T. J. (1988). Time spent communicating: A multiple levels of analysis approach. Human Relations, 41, 655-676.