Elevating women's voices in congress: Speech participation in the house of representatives

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 910-923

  Pearson, Kathryn ^a   Dancey, Logan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

legislative studies; politics; speech; women

Indexed keywords

EID: 82955228862     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1065912910388190     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Boxer BarbaraStrangers in the Senate. Washington, DC: National Press Books; 1993:.
2. Burden Barry C.Personal roots of representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007:.
3. Burrell Barbara C.A woman's place is in the house: Campaigning for Congress in the feminist era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1994:.
4. Campbell David E.,Wolbrecht Christina.See Jane run: Women politicians as role models for adolescents.Journal of Politics. 2006;68:233-47.
5. Carroll Susan J.Women as candidates in American politics. 1994. Women as candidates in American politics. 2nd ed.Bloomington: Indiana University PressBloomington: Indiana University Press; 1994:.
6. Carroll Susan J.Women transforming Congress. Rosenthal Cindy Simon, ed. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 2002:50-68.
7. CNN. 2006. Bush/polls/Congress/Gergen interview. Anderson Cooper 360, June16. Vanderbilt Television News Archive. http://tvnews.vanderbilt.edu/program.pl?ID=831795 (accessed January 13, 2010).
8. Cranford John.Key votes 2005: Power plays and polarization.CQ Weekly Online. 2006;9:108-9.
9. Dodson Debra L.Women and elective office. Thomas SueWilcox Clyde, ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998:130-149.
10. Dodson Debra L.The impact of women in Congress. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2006:.
11. DreierDavid. 1999. One minute speeches. Parliamentary outreach program. U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Rules Majority Office106 (16). http://rules.house.gov/POP/pop106_16.htm.
12. Duerst-Lahti GeorgiaWomen transforming Congress. Rosenthal Cindy Simon, ed. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 2002:20-49.
13. Eagly Alice H.,Karau Steven J.Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.Psychological Review. 2002;109:573-98.
14. Foerstel Karen,Foerstel HerbertClimbing the hill: Gender conflict in Congress. Westport, CT: Praeger; 1996:.
15. Fowler Linda L.,McClure RobertPolitical ambition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1989:.
16. Fulton Sarah,Maestas Cherie,Maisel L. Sandy,Stone Walter J.The sense of a woman: Gender and congressional ambition.Political Research Quarterly. 2006;59:235-48.
17. Gamble Katrina L.Black political representation: An examination of legislative activity within U.S. House committees.Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2007;32:421-48.
18. Gelb Joyce,Palley Marian LiefWomen and public policies: Reassessing gender politics. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia; 1996:.
19. Gerrity Jessica C.,Osborn Tracy,Mendez Jeanette Morehouse.Women and representation: A different view of the district?.Politics and Gender. 2007;3:179-200.
20. Hall RichardParticipation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1996:.
21. Hawkesworth Mary.Congressional enactments of race-gender: Toward a theory of raced-gendered institutions.American Political Science Review. 2003;97:529-50.
22. Huddy Leonie,Terkildsen Nayda.Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates.American Journal of Political Science. 1993;37:119-47.
23. Jenkins Shannon.Woman's work is never done? Fund-raising perception and effort among female state legislative candidates.Political Research Quarterly. 2007;60:230-39.
24. Kathlene Lyn.Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates.American Political Science Review. 1994;88:560-76.
25. Lawless Jennifer L.Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post-September 11th era.Political Research Quarterly. 2004;57:479-90.
26. Lawless Jennifer L.,Fox RichardIt takes a candidate: Why women don't run for office. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005:.
27. Long J. ScottRegression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997:.
28. Long J. Scott,Freese JeremyRegression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2006:.
29. Maltzman Forrest,Sigelman Lee.The politics of talk: Unconstrained floor time in the U.S. House of Representatives.Journal of Politics. 1996;58:819-30.
30. Mann, Thomas, and Norman Ornstein. 2006. Our do-nothing Congress. Los Angeles Times, September 27. http://articles.latimes.com/2006/sep/27/opinion/oe-mann27.
31. Mansbridge Jane J.Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent "yes.".Journal of Politics. 1999;61:628-57.
32. Margolies-Mezvinsky MarjorieA woman's place: The freshmen women who changed the face of Congress. New York: Crown; 1994:.
33. Mayhew DavidCongress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1974:.
34. McDermott Monika L.Voting cues in low-information elections: Candidate gender as a social information variable in contemporary US elections.American Journal of Political Science. 1997;41:270-83.
35. Molinari SusanRepresentative mom: Balancing budgets, bill and baby in the U.S. Congress. New York: Doubleday; 1998:.
36. Morris Jonathan S.Reexamining the politics of talk: Partisan rhetoric in the 104th House.Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2001;26:101-21.
37. NBC. 1991. Abortion/House vote. NBC Nightly News, June30. Vanderbilt Television News Archive. http://tvnews.vanderbilt.edu/program.pl?ID=593693 (accessed January 13, 2010).
38. Norton Noelle H.Uncovering the dimensionality of gender voting in Congress.Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1999;24:65-86.
39. Osborn Tracy,Mendez Jeanette Morehouse.Speaking as women: Women and floor speeches in the Senate.Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy. 2010;31:1-21.
40. Palmer Barbara,Simon DennisBreaking the political glass ceiling: Women and congressional elections. New York: Routledge; 2006:.
41. Pearson Kathryn,McGhee EricManuscript, University of Minnesota; 2009:.
42. Pitkin HannaThe concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1967:.
43. Poole Keith T.,Rosenthal HowardCongress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997:.
44. Rocca Michael S.Nonlegislative debate in the U.S. House of Representatives.American Politics Research. 2007;35:489-505.
45. Rosenthal Cindy SimonWhen women lead: Integrative leadership in state legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998:.
46. Women transforming Congress. Rosenthal Cindy Simon, ed. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 2002:.
47. Rosenthal Cindy SimonLegislative women: Getting elected, getting ahead. Reingold Beth, ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 2008:197-220.
48. Sanbonmatsu Kira.Gender stereotypes and vote choice.American Journal of Political Science. 2002a;46:20-34.
49. Sanbonmatsu Kira.Political parties and the recruitment of women to state legislatures.Journal of Politics. 2002b;64:791-809.
50. Schroeder Pat24 years of house work. . and the place is still a mess: My life in politics. Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel; 1998:.
51. Shogan Colleen.Speaking out: An analysis of Democratic and Republican woman-invoked rhetoric in the 105th Congress.Women & Politics. 2002;23:129-46.
52. Swers Michele L.Are women more likely to vote for women's issues bills than their male colleagues?.Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1998;23:435-48.
53. Swers Michele L.The difference women make: The policy impact of women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2002:.
54. Walsh Katherine CramerWomen transforming Congress. Rosenthal Cindy Simon, ed. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 2002:370-98.