Bioinformatics: Biomarkers of early detection

Cancer Biomarkers

Volumn 9, Issue 1-6, 2011, Pages 511-530

  Crichton, Daniel J ^a   Mattmann, Chris A ^a   Thornquist, Mark ^b   Anton, Kristen ^c   Hughes, J Steven ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

biomarker database; biomarker research; data curation; Data Grid; data intensive systems; data sharing; e science; EDRN knowledge environment; informatics infrastructure; metadata

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; TUMOR MARKER;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CANCER CENTER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RESEARCH; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DATA BASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION; INFORMATION SYSTEM; KNOWLEDGE; ORGANIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 82955211505     PISSN: 15740153     EISSN: 18758592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/CBM-2011-0180     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. D. Crichton et al. , An Interoperable Data Architecture for Data Exchange in a Biomedical Research Network, In Proc. CBMS, 2001.
2. D. Crichton et al. , Creating a National Virtual Knowledge Environment for Proteomics and Information Management, in Informatics and Proteomics: Marcel Dekker Publishers, 2005.
3. M. Pepe et al. , Phases of Biomarker Development for Early Detection of Cancer, Journal of the National Cancer Institute 93 (2001), 1054-1061.
4. T. Reynolds, Validating Biomarkers: Early Detection Research Network Launches First Phase III Study, Journal of the National Cancer Institute 95 (2003), 422-423.
5. I. Foster et al. , The Physiology of the Grid: An Open Grid Services Architecture forDistributed Systems Integration, Globus Research, Work-in-Progress 2002.
6. C. Kesselman et al. , The Anatomy of the Grid: Enabling Scalable Virtual Organizations, Intl' Journal of Supercomputing Applications, 2001 pp. 1-25.
7. D. Crichton et al. , A Science Data System Architecture for Information Retrieval, in Clustering and Information Retrieval: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
8. D. Crichton et al. , A Distributed Data Architecture for the 2001 Mars Odyssey Data Distribution, In Proc. Space Mission Challenges for Information Technology, Pasadena, CA, 2001.
9. J. S. Hughes et al. , Intelligent Resource Discovery using Ontology-based Resource Profiles, Data Science Journal, 2005.
10. J. S. Hughes et al. , A Planetary Data System for the 2006 Mars Reconnaisance Orbiter Era and Beyond, In Proc. 2nd ESA Symposium on Ensuring the Long Term Preservation and Adding Value to Scientific and Technical Data (PV-2004), Frascati, Italy, 2004.
11. J. S. Hughes et al. , An Ontology-Based Archive Information Model for the Planetary Science Community, In Proc. Spaceops, Heidelberg, Germany, 2008.
12. J. S. Hughes and S. K. McMahon, The Planetary Data System. A Case Study in the Development and Management of Meta- Data for a Scientific Digital Library, In Proc. ECDL, 1998.
13. S. Hughes et al. , The Semantic Planetary Data System, In Proc. 3rd Symposium on Ensuring Long-term Preservation and Adding Value to Scientific and Technical Data, The Royal Society, Edinburgh, UK, 2005.
14. C. Mattmann et al. , A Classification and Evaluation of Data Movement Technologies for the Delivery of Highly Voluminous Scientific Data Products, In Proc. NASA/IEEE Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST2006), College Park, Maryland, 2006.
15. C. Mattmann et al. , GLIDE: A Grid-based, Lightweight, Infrastructure for Data-intensive Environments, In Proc. European Grid Conference, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2005.
16. N. Medvidovic and R. N. Taylor, A Classification and Comparison Framework for Software Architecture Description Languages, IEEE TSE 26 (2000), 70-93.
17. A. Hart et al. , An Extensible Biomarker Curation Approach and Software Infrastructure for the Early Detection of Cancer, In Proc. IEEE Intl. Conference on Health Informatics, Porto, Portugal, 2009.
18. ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 11179: Information Technology - Metadata registries (MDR), , 2008.
19. D. Bernholdt et al. , The Earth system grid: supporting the next generation of climate modeling research, Proceedings of the IEEE 93 (2005), 485-495.
20. H. Tangmunarunkit et al. , Ontology-BasedResourceMatching in the Grid - The Grid Meets the Semantic Web, In Proc. ISWC, 2003.
21. S. Patig, Evolution of entity-relationship modelling, Data Knowl Eng 56 (2006), 122-138.
22. N. Medvidovic et al. , Modeling software architectures in the Unified Modeling Language, ACMTrans Softw Eng Methodol 11 (2002), 2-57.
23. H. Eriksson and M. Musen, Metatools for Knowledge Acquisition, IEEE Softw 10 (1993), 23-29.
24. C. Lynch, Big data: How do your data grow? Nature 455 (2008), 28-29.
25. C. Mattmann et al. , Software Architecture for Large-scale, Distributed, Data-Intensive Systems, In Proc. 4th IEEE/IFIP Working Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA-4), Oslo, Norway, 2004.
26. C. Mattmann et al. , A Software Architecture-Based Framework for Highly Distributed and Data Intensive Scientific Applications, In Proc. International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Shanghai, China, 2006.
27. C. Mattmann et al. , Unlocking theGrid, In Proc. 8th ACMSIGSOFT International Symposium on Component-based Software Engineering, St. Louis, MO, 2005.
28. M. Gudgin et al. , Simple Object Access Protocol Version 1. 2, 2003.
29. Committee on Data Management, Archiving, and Computing (CODMAC) Data Level Definitions, . gov/research/earth science formats. html, 2008.
30. A. Finkelstein et al. , Computational Challenges of Systems Biology, IEEE Computer 37 (2004), 26-33.
31. R. Begent et al. , Challenges of Ultra Large Scale Integration of Biomedical Computing Systems, In Proc. CBMS, Dublin, Ireland, 2005.
32. A. Chervenak et al. , The Data Grid: Towards an Architecture for the Distributed Management and Analysis of Large ScientificData Sets, Journal of Network and Computer Applications 23 (2000), 187-200.
33. H. Gomaa et al. , A Software Architectural Design Method for Large-Scale Distributed Information Systems, J. of Distributed Systems Engineering (1996), 162-172.
34. R. Fielding, Architectural Styles and the Design of Networkbased Software Architectures, Ph. D. , University of California, Irvine, 2000.
35. A. Finkelstein et al. , RelatingRequirements and Architectures: A Study of Data Grids, J. of Grid Computing 2 (2004), 207-222.
36. D. Keator et al. , A National Human Neuroimaging Collaboratory Enabled By the Biomedical Informatics ResearchNetwork (BIRN), IEEE Trans. Information Technology in Biomedicine 12 (2008), 162-172.
37. Birn - describing your data, http://nbirn. net/bdr/study, information. shtm, 2008.
38. National Cancer Institute, http://cabig. nci. nih. gov/, February, 2004,
39. ERNE Interface to caTissue, play/edrn/ERNE+Interface+to+caTissue, 2006.
40. C. Baral et al. , Collaborative curation of data from bio-medical texts and abstracts and its integration, in Data Integration in the Life Sciences, 2005, pp. 309-312.
41. S. S. Keerthi et al. , A machine learning approach for the curation of biomedical literature: Kdd cup 2002 (task 1), SIGKDD Explor Newsl 4 (2002), 93-94.
42. caTissue Core, . , 2008.
43. K. Birmingham, An Inauspicious Start for the U. S. National Biospecimen Network, J Clin Invest 113 (2004), 320.