Elicitation of informed general population health state utility values: A review of the literature

Value in Health

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1153-1157

  McTaggart Cowan, Helen ^a  

^a BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY   (Canada)

Author keywords

adaptation; general population; health states; informed utilities; review

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIMULATION; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 82955205841     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.046     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2008 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence London
2. J. Brazier, J. Ratcliffe, J. Salomon, A. Tsuchiya Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation 2007 Oxford University Press Oxford
3. E. Nord, J.L. Pinto, J. Richardson Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programs Health Econ 8 1999 25 39 (Pubitemid 29057353)
4. M.R. Gold, J.E. Siegal, L.B. Russell, M.C. Weinstein Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine 1996 Oxford University Press Oxford
5. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2008 National Institute for Clinical Excellence London
6. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies: Canada 2006 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Ottawa
7. D.L. Sackett, G.W. Torrance The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public J Chron Dis 31 1978 697 704
8. Y. Peeters, A.M. Stiggelbout Health state valuations of patients and the general public analytically compared: a meta-analytical comparison of patient and population health state utilities Value Health 13 2010 306 309
9. P.A. Ubel, G. Loewenstein, C. Jepson Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluation of patients and the general public Qual Life Res 12 2003 599 607 (Pubitemid 37094023)
10. J. Brazier, R. Akehurst, A. Brennan Should patients have a greater role in valuing health states? Appl Health Econ Health Policy 4 2005 201 208 (Pubitemid 43242208)
11. A.M. Stiggelbout, E. de Voel-Voogt Health state utilities: a framework for studying the gap between the imagined and the real Value Health 11 2008 76 87 (Pubitemid 351160878)
12. D.G. Fryback Whose quality of life? Or whose decision? Qual Life Res 12 2003 609 610 (Pubitemid 37094024)
13. D.A. Schkade, D. Kahneman Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgements of life satisfaction Psychol Sci 9 1998 340 346
14. P. Dolan, D. Kahneman Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health Econ J 118 2008 215 234
15. P. Kind, J. Elston Lafata, K. Matuszewski The use of QALYs in clinical and patient decisionmaking: issues and prospects Value Health 12 Suppl. 1 2009 S27 S30
16. R.E. Bramlett, A.K. Bothe, D.M. Franic Using preference-based measures to assess quality of life in stuttering J Speech Lang Hearing Res 49 2006 381 394 (Pubitemid 350056575)
17. A. Briggs, D. Wild, M. Lees Impact of schizophrenia and schizophrenia treatment-related adverse events on quality of life: directly utility experience Health Qual Life Outcomes 6 2008 105
18. A.E. Clarke, M.K. Goldstein, D. Michelson The effect of assessment method and respondent population on utilities elicited for Gaucher disease Qual Life Res 6 1997 169 184 (Pubitemid 27207282)
19. S.J. Cunningham, N.P. Hunt A comparison of health state utilities for dentofacial deformity as derived from patients and members of the general population Eur J Orthodon 22 2000 335 342
20. M. Happich, T. von Legerke Valuing the health state 'tinnitus': differences between patients and the general public Hearing Res 207 2005 50 58 (Pubitemid 41319707)
21. T.L. Lee, J.K. Ziegler, R. Sommi Comparison of preferences for health outcomes in schizophrenia among stake holder groups J Psychiat Res 34 2000 201 210 (Pubitemid 30364920)
22. L.A. Lenert, A.P. Sturley, M.H. Rapaport Public preferences for health states with schizophrenia and a mapping function to estimate utilities from positive and negative symptom scale scores Schizo Res 71 2004 155 165 (Pubitemid 39209485)
23. S. Aballéa, A. Tsuchiya Seeing for yourself: feasibility study towards valuing visual impairment using simulation spectacles Health Econ 16 2007 537 543 (Pubitemid 46784287)
24. C. Czoski-Murray, J. Carlton, J. Brazier Valuing condition-specific health states using simulation contact lenses Value Health 12 2009 793 799
25. A. Shiell, P. Hawe, M. Fletcher Reliability of health utility measures and a test of values clarification Soc Sci Med 56 2003 1531 1541 (Pubitemid 36279486)
26. K. Stein, J. Ratcliffe, A. Round Impact of discussion on preferences elicited in a group setting Health Qual Life Outcomes 4 2006 22
27. L.J. Damschroder, B.J. Zikmund-Fisher, P.A. Ubel The impact of considering adaptation in health state valuation Soc Sci Med 61 2005 267 277 (Pubitemid 40694114)