Impact of discussion on preferences elicited in a group setting

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Volumn 4, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Stein, Ken ^a   Ratcliffe, Julie ^b   Round, Alison ^a   Milne, Ruairidh ^c   Brazier, John E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO LIFE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECZEMA; FEMALE; GAUCHER DISEASE; GROUP DYNAMICS; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEART FAILURE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MORALITY; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; TELEPHONE; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSENSUS; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GAMBLING; GOVERNING BOARD; GREAT BRITAIN; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEGOTIATING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SOCIAL VALUES; STATE MEDICINE; TRUSTEES;

EID: 33645885903     PISSN: 14777525     EISSN: 14777525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-22     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London, National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2003.
2. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB: Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine consensus statement. JAMA 1996, 276:1253-1258.
3. Brazier J, Deverill M: Obtaining the 'Q' in QALYs: a comparison of five multi-attribute utility scales. Sheffield Health Economics Group; 1999.
4. Dolan P: Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997, 35:1095-1108.
5. Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G, Barr R: The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Ann Med 2001, 33:375-384.
6. Torrance G: Health Utility Index. Med Care 1996, 34:166-167.
7. von Neumann J, Morganstern O: Theory of games and economic behaviour. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1947.
8. Hargreaves-Heap S, Hollis B, Lyons B, Sugden R, Weale R: The theory of choice: a critical guide. Oxford: Blackwell; 1992.
9. Aumann R: Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica 1962, 30:445-462.
10. Fischhoff B: Value elicitation: is there anything in there? American Psychologist 1991, 46:835-847.
11. Ryan M, San Miguel F: Revisiting the axiom of completeness. Health Econ 2003, 12:295-307.
12. Payne J, Bettman J: Behavioural decision research: a constructive processing perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 1992, 43:87-131.
13. Slovic P, Liechtenstein S: Preference reversals: a broader perspective. Am Econ Rev 1983, 73:596-605.
14. Gregory R, Liechtenstein S, Slovic P: Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach. J Risk Uncertain 1993, 7:177-197.
15. Slovic P: The construction of preferences. Am Psychol 1995, 50:364-371.
16. Clark J, Burgess J, Harrison C: "I struggled with this money business": Respondents' perpectives on contingent valuation. Ecol Econ 2000, 33:45-62.
17. Shiell A, Seymour J, Hawe P, Cameron S: Are preferences over health states complete? Health Econ 2000, 9:47-55.
18. Chapman R, Berger M, Weinstein MC, Weeks J, Goldie S, Neumann P: When does quality-adjusting life-years matter in cost-effectiveness analysis? Health Econ 2004, 13:429-436.
19. Dolan P, Cookson R, Ferguson B: Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group study. BMJ 1999, 318:916-919.
20. Schunemann H, Stahl H, Austin P, Akl E, Armstrong D, Guyatt G: A comparison of narrative and table formats for presenting hypothetical health states to patients with gastrointestinal or pulmonary disease. Med Decis Making 2004, 24:53-60.
21. Glaser B, Strauss A: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldin; 1967.
22. Feeny D, Blanchard CM, Mahon JL, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Stitt L, Webster-Bogaert S: The stability of utility scores: test-retest reliability and the interpretation of utility scores in elective total hip arthroplasty. Qual Life Res 2004, 13:15-22.
23. Oliver A: Complete preferences over health states: a reply to the paper by shiell et al. Health Econ 2000, 9:727-728.
24. Gerard K, Dobson M, Hall J: Framing and labelling effects in health descriptions: quality adjusted life years for treatment of breast cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 1993, 46:77-84.