Perceptual and physiological responses to Jackson Pollock's fractals

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue JUNE, 2011, Pages

  Taylor, Richard P ^a   Spehar, Branka ^b   van Donkelaar, Paul ^a   Hagerhall, Caroline M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

EEG; Esthetics; Eye tracking; Fractals; Visual preference

Indexed keywords

COLOR VISION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ESTHETICS; EYE DOMINANCE; EYE TRACKING; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; GAZE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; NEUROBIOLOGY; PAINTING; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REVIEW; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SENSORY SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

EID: 82955198518     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00060     Document Type: Review

References (115)

1. Abraham, F. D., Sprott, J. C., Mitina, O., Osorio, M., Dequito, E. A., and Pinili, J. M. (2011). Judgments of time, aesthetics, and complexity as a function of the fractal dimension of images formed by chaotic attractors. (in press).
2. Aks, D., and Sprott, J. (1996). Quantifying aesthetic preference for chaotic patterns. Empirical Stud. Arts 14, 1-16.
3. Alvarez-Ramirez, J., Echeverria, J. C., and Rodriguez, E. (2008a). Performance of a high-dimensional R/S analysis method for Hurst exponent estimation. Physica A 387, 6452-6462.
4. Alvarez-Ramirez, J., Ibarra-Valdez, C., Rodriguez, E., and Dagdug, L. (2008b). 1/f-noise structure in Pollock's drip paintings. Physica A 387, 281-295.
5. Barnsley, M. (1993). Fractals Everywhere. London: Academic Press.
6. Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
7. Billock, V. A. (2000). Neural acclimation to 1/f spatial frequency spectra in natural images transduced by human visual system. Physica D 137, 379.
8. Billock, V. A., de Guzman, G. C., and Scott Kelso, J. A. (2001). Fractal time and 1/f spectra in dynamic images and human vision. Physica D 148, 136-146.
9. Boon, J. P., Casti, J., and Taylor, R. P. (2011). Artistic forms and complexity. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol. Life Sci. 15, 265-283.
10. Bragg, M. (1987). Jackson Pollock. TV documentary, South Bank Show, Independent Television.
11. Burrough, P. A. (1981). Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data. Nature 295, 240-242.
12. Busswell, G. (1935). How People Look at Pictures: A Study of the Psychology of Perception in Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Cambel, A. B. (1993). Applied Chaos Theory: A Paradigm for Complexity. London: Academic Press.
14. Castrejon-Pita, J. R., Castrejon-Pita, A. A., and Sarmiento-Galan, A. (2003). Nasca lines: a mystery wrapped in an enigma. Chaos 13, 836.
15. Chopard, B., Hermann, H. J., and Vicsek, T. (1991). Structure and growth mechanism of mineral dendrites. Nature 309, 409.
16. Coddington, J., Elton, J., Rockmore, D., and Wang, Y. (2008). Multi-fractal analysis and authentication of Jackson Pollock paintings. Proc. SPIE 6810, 1-12.
17. Cohn, J. (1894). Experimentelle unterschungen uber die gefuhlsbetonung der farben helligkeiten, und ihrer combinationen. Phil. Stud. 10, 562-603.
18. Cutting, J. E., and Garvin, J. J. (1987). Fractal curves and complexity. Percept. Psychophys. 42, 365-370.
19. Davidson, R. J., and Hugdahl, K. (1996). Baseline asymmetries in brain electrical activity predict dichotic listening performance. Neuropsychology 10, 241-246.
20. DiPaola, S., Riebe, C., and Enns, J. T. (2010). Rembrandt's textural agency: a shared perspective in visual art and science. Leonardo 43, 145-151.
21. Eaton, L. K. (1998). "Fractal geometry in the late works of Frank Lloyd Wright," in Architecture and Mathematics, ed. K. Williams (Firenze: Edizioni dell'Erba), 23-38.
22. Fairbanks, M. S., Mureika, J., and Taylor, R. P. (2010). Multifractal analysis of the painting techniques of adults and children. SPIE Proc. Electron. Imaging 7531, 1-6.
23. Fairbanks, M. S., and Taylor, R. P. (2011). Scaling Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Patterns: From the Human Eye to the Foraging Albatross. Non-linear Dynamical Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Using Real Data. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis Group.
24. Family, F., Masters, B. R., and Platt, D. E. (1989). Fractal pattern formation in human retinal vessels. Physica D 38, 98.
25. Fechner, G. T. (1876). Vorschule der Asthetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf and Hartel.
26. Feder, J. (1988). Fractals. New York: Plenum.
27. Field, D. J., and Brady, N. (1997). Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes. Vision Res. 37, 3367-3383.
28. Forsythe, A., Nadal, M., Sheehy, N., Cela-Conde, C. J., and Sawey, M. (2011). Predicting beauty: fractal dimension and visual complexity. Br. J. Psychol. 102, 49-70.
29. Foulsham, T., and Kingstone, A. (2010). Asymmetries in the direction of saccades during perception of scenes and fractals: effects of image type and image features. Vision Res. 50, 779-795.
30. Fuchs, I., Ansorge, U., Redies, C., and Leder, H. (2011). Salience in paintings: bottom-up influences on eye fixations. Cognit. Comput. 3, 25-36.
31. Geake, J., and Landini, G. (1997). Individual differences in the perception of fractal curves. Fractals 5, 129-143.
32. Gilden, D. L., Schmuckler, M. A., and Clayton, K. (1993). The perception of natural contour. Psychol. Rev. 100, 460-478.
33. Goldberger, A. L. (1996). Fractals and the birth of gothic. Mol. Psychiatry 1, 99-104.
34. Gouyet, J. F. (1996). Physics and Fractal Structures. New York: Springer.
35. Graham, D. J., and Field, D. (2007). Statistical regularities of art images and natural scenes: spectra. Sparseness and non-linearities. Spat. Vis. 21, 149-164.
36. Graham, D. J., and Field, D. (2008). Variations in intensity for representative and abstract art, and for art from Eastern and Western Hemispheres. Perception 37, 1341-1352.
37. Graham, D. J., and Redies, C. (2010). Statistical regularities in art: relations with visual coding and perception. Vision Res. 50, 1503-1509.
38. Hagerhall, C. M. (2005). "Fractal dimension as a tool for defining and measuring naturalness," in Designing Social Innovation - Planning, Building, Evaluating, eds B. Martens and A. G. Keul (Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe and Huber), 75-82.
39. Hagerhall, C. M., Laike, T., Taylor, R. P., Küller, M., Küller, R., and Martin, T. P. (2008). Investigation of EEG response to fractal patterns. Perception 37, 1488-1494.
40. Hagerhall, C. M., Purcell, T., and Taylor, R. P. (2004). Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference. J. Environ. Psychol. 24, 247-255.
41. Heath, T., Smith, H. G. G., and Lim, B. (2000). Tall buildings and the urban skyline. The effect of visual complexity on preferences. Environ. Behav. 32, 541-556.
42. Hyona, J., Munoz, D. P., Heide, W., and Radach, R. (2002). The brain's eye: neurobiological and clinical aspects of oculomotor research. Prog. Brain Res. 140, 1.
43. Irfan, M., and Stork, D. (2009). Multiple visual features for the computer authentication of Jackson Pollock's drip paintings: beyond box counting and fractals. SPIE Electron. Imaging 7251, 72510Q1-72510Q11.
44. Jang, J., and Rajala, S. A. (1990). Segmentation based image coding using fractals and the human visual system. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 4, 1957-1960.
45. Keller, J. M., Crownover, R. M., and Chen, R. Y. (1987). Characteristics of natural scenes related to the fractal dimension. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 9, 621-627.
46. Knill, D. C., Field, D., and Kersten, D. (1990). Human discrimination of fractal images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 77, 1113-1123.
47. Koch, M., Denzler, J., and Redies, C. (2010). 1/f2 characteristics and isotropy in the Fourier power spectrum of visual art, cartoons, comics, mangas and different categories of photographs. PLoS ONE 5, e12268. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0012268
48. Kolb, B., and Whishaw, I. Q. (2003). Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology. New York: Worth Publishers.
49. Küller, R. (1991). "Environmental assessment from a neuropsychological perspective," in Environment, Cognition and Action. An Integrated Approach, eds T. Gärling and G. W. Evans (New York: Oxford University Press), 111-147.
50. Küller, R., Mikellides, B., and Janssens, J. (2009). Color, arousal, and performance - a comparison of three experiments. Color Res. Appl. 34, 141-152.
51. Laufs, H., Kleinschmidt, A., Beyerle, A., Eger, E., Salek-Haddadi, A., Preibisch, and Krakow, C. (2003a). EEG-correlated fMRI of human alpha activity. Neuroimage 19, 1463-1476.
52. Laufs, H., Krakow, K., Sterzer, P., Eger, E., Beyerle, A., Salek-Haddadi, A., and Kleinschmidt, A. (2003b). Electroencephalographic signatures of attentional and cognitive default modes in spontaneous brain activity fluctuations at rest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 11053-11058.
53. Lee, S., Olsen, S., and Gooch, B. (2006). "Non-photorealistic animation and rendering," in Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 97-104.
54. Lee, S., Olsen, S., and Gooch, B. (2007). Simulating and analyzing Jackson Pollock's paintings. J. Math. Arts 1, 73-83.
55. Locher, P. (2006). The usefulness of eye movements to subject an aesthetic episode with visual art to empirical scrutiny. Psychol. Sci. 48, 106-114.
56. Locher, P., Krupinski, E. A., Mello-Thoms, C., and Nodine, C. F. (2007). Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. Spat. Vis. 21, 55-77.
57. Louis, E., Guinea, F., and Flores, F. (1986). "The fractal nature of fracture," in Fractals in Physics, eds L. Pietronero and E. Tossati (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science), 177.
58. Lovejoy, S. (1982). Area-perimeter pelation for pain and cloud areas. Science 216, 185.
59. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
60. Matsushita, M., and Fukiwara, H. (1993). "Fractal growth and morphological change in bacterial colony formation," in Growth Patterns in Physical Sciences and Biology, eds J. M. Garcia-Ruiz, E. Louis, P. Meaken, and L. M. Sander (New York: Plenum Press), 23-40.
61. Mitterschiffthaler, M. T., Fu, C. H. Y., Dalton, J. A., Andrew, C. M., Steven, C. R., and Williams, S. C. R. (2007). A functional MRI study of happy and sad affective states induced by classical music. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28, 1150-1162.
62. Morse, D. R., Larson, J. H., Dodson, M. M., and Williamson, M. H. (1985). Fractal dimension of arthropod body lengths. Nature 315, 731-733.
63. Mureika, J. R. (2005). Fractal Dimensions in fractal color space: a comparison study using Jackson Pollock's art. Chaos 15, 043702-1-6.
64. Mureika, J. R., Dyer, C. C., and Cupchik, G. C. (2004). Multifractal structure in non-representational art. Leonardo 37, 53-56.
65. Mureika, J. R., Dyer, C. C., and Cupchik, G. C. (2005). Multifractal structure in nonrepresentational art. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 72, 0461010-1-15.
66. Niemeyer, L., Pietronero, L., and Wiesmann, H. J. (1984). Fractal dimension of dielectric breakdown. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1033-1036.
67. Nittmann, J., and Stanley, H. E. (1987). Non-deterministic approach to anisotropic growth patterns with continuously tunable morphology: the fractal properties of some real snowflakes. J. Phys. A 20, L1185-L1189.
68. Nodine, C., and Krupinski, E. (2003). How do viewers look at artworks? Bull. Psychol. Arts 4, 65-68.
69. Oakes, T. R., Pizzagalli, D. A., Hendrick, A. M., Horras, K. A; Larson, C. L., Abercrombie, H. C., Schaefer, S. M., Koger, JV., and Davidson, R. J. (2004). Functional coupling of simultaneous electrical and metabolic activity in the human brain. Hum. Brain Mapp. 21, 257-270.
70. O'Connor, F. V. (1967). Jackson Pollock. New York: Museum of Modern Art.
71. Pentland, A. P. (1984). Fractal-based description of natural scenes. IEEE Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 6, 661-674.
72. Pickover, C. (1995). Keys to Infinity. New York: Wiley, 206.
73. Potter, J. (1985). To a Violent Grave: An Oral Biography of Jackson Pollock. New York: G.P. Putman and Sons.
74. Ramaschandran, V. S., and Hirstein, W. J. (1999). The science of art: a neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Conscious. Stud. 6, 15.
75. Rayner, K., and Pollatsek, A. (1992). Eye movements and scene perception. Can. J. Psychol. 46, 342-376.
76. Redies, C. (2007). A universal model of esthetic perception based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli. Spat. Vis. 21, 97-117.
77. Redies, C., Hasenstein, J., and Denzler, J. (2007). Fractal-like image statistics in visual art: similar to natural scenes. Spat. Vis. 21, 137-148.
78. Richards, R. (2001). A new aesthetic for environmental awareness: chaos theory, the beauty of nature, and our broader humanistic identity. J. Humanist. Psychol. 41, 59-95.
79. Richards, R., and Kerr, C. (1999). The fractal form of nature: a resonant aesthetics. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology and Life Sciences, Berkeley.
80. Rogowitz, B. E., and Voss, R. F. (1990). Shape perception and low dimensional fractal boundary contours. in Proceedings of the conference on human vision: Methods, Models and Applications, S.P.I.E./SPSE Symposium on Electron Imaging, Vol. 1249, Santa Clara, 387-394.
81. Ruderman, D. L. (1997). Origins of scaling in natural images. Vision Res. 37, 3385.
82. Schroeder, M. (1991). Fractals, Chaos and Power Laws. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
83. Skjeltorp, P. (1988). "Fracture experiments on monolayers of microspheres," in Random Fluctuations and Pattern Growth, eds H. E. Stanley and N. Ostrowsky (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic), 424-426.
84. Spehar, B., Clifford, C., Newell, B., and Taylor, R. P. (2003). Universal aesthetic of fractals. Chaos Graph. 37, 813-820.
85. Sprott, J. C. (1993). Automatic generation of strange attractors. Comput. Graph. 17, 325-332.
86. Stamps, A. E. (2002). Fractals, skylines, nature and beauty. Landsc. Urban Plan. 60, 163-184.
87. Switkes, E., Mayer, M. J., and Sloan, J. A. (1978). Spatial frequency analysis of the visual environment: anisotropy and the carpentered environment hypothesis. Vision Res. 18, 1393-1399.
88. Taylor, R. P. (1998). Splashdown. New Sci. 2144, 30-31.
89. Taylor, R. P. (2001). Architect reaches for the clouds. Nature 410, 18.
90. Taylor, R. P. (2002a). Spotlight on a visual language. Nature 415, 961.
91. Taylor, R. P. (2002b). Order in Pollock's chaos. Sci. Am. 287, 84-89.
92. Taylor, R. P. (2003). "Fractal expressionism-where art meets science," in Art and Complexity, eds J. Casti and A. Karlqvist (Amsterdam: Elsevier Press), 117-144.
93. Taylor, R. P. (2004). Mondrian, Pollock and nature: recent scientific investigations. Chaos Compl. Lett. 1, 29.
94. Taylor, R. P. (2006). Reduction of physiological stress using fractal art and architecture. Leonardo 39, 245-251.
95. Taylor, R. P. (2009). Reflecting the impossible. Nature 460 462.
96. Taylor, R. P. (2011). Fractal Expressionism: The Art and Science of Jackson Pollock. To be published by World Scientific.
97. Taylor, R. P., Guzman, R., Martin, T. M., Hall, G., Micolich, A. P., Jonas, D., Scannell, B. C., Fairbanks, M. S., and Marlow, C. A. (2007). Authenticating Pollock paintings with fractal geometry. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 28, 695.
98. Taylor, R. P., Micolich, A. P., and Jonas, D. (1999a). Fractal analysis of Pollock's drip paintings. Nature 399, 422.
99. Taylor, R. P., Micolich, A. P., and Jonas, D. (1999b). Fractal expressionism. Phys. World 12, 25-28.
100. Taylor, R. P., Micolich, A. P., and Jonas, D. (2002). The construction of Pollock's fractal drip paintings. Leonardo 35, 203.
101. Taylor, R. P., Micolich, A. P., and Jonas, D. (2006). Revisiting Pollock's drip paintings. Nature 444, E10-E11.
102. Taylor, R. P., and Sprott, J. C. (2008). Biophilic fractals and the visual journey of organic screen-savers. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol. Life Sci. 12, 117-129.
103. Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, Biophobia and Natural Landscapes. The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington DC: Island Press.
104. Ulrich, R. S., and Simons, R. F. (1986). Recovery from stress during exposure to everyday outdoor environments. Proc. EDRA 17, 115-122.
105. Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: some psychophysiological effects. Environ. Behav. 13, 523-556.
106. Van Tonder, G. J., Lyons, M. J., and Ejima, Y. (2002). Visual structure of a Japanese Zen garden. Nature 419, 359.
107. Varnedoe, K., and Karmel, K. (1998). Jackson Pollock. New York: Abrams.
108. Vicsek, T. (1989). Fractal Growth Phenomena. Singapore: World Scientific.
109. Viswanathan, G. M., Afanasyev, V., Buldyrev, S. V., Murphy, E. J., Prince, P. A., and Stanley, H. E. (1996). Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses. Nature 381, 413-415.
110. Voss, R. F. (1998). Local connected fractal dimension analysis of early Chinese landscape paintings and X-ray mam-mograms. Fractal Image Encoding Anal. NATO ASI Ser. 159, 279-297.
111. Wallraven, C., Kaulard, K., Kurner, C., Pepperell, R., and Bulthoff, H. H. (2007). Psychophysics for Perception of (In)Determinate Art. APGV 2007, New York: ACM Press, 115-122.
112. Webster, M. A. (2002). Adaption, high-level vision, and the phenomenology of perception. SPIE 4662, 1-11.
113. Werner, B. T. (1999). Complexity in natural landform patterns. Science 102, 284.
114. Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press.
115. Zeki, S. (1999). Inner vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.