Artistic forms and complexity

Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 265-283

  Boon, J P ^a   Casti, J ^b   Taylor, R P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Art; Complexity; Fractal dimension; Music

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CREATIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ESTHETICS; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; HEARING; HUMAN; MUSIC; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PAINTING; REVIEW; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CREATIVENESS; ESTHETICS; FRACTALS; HUMANS; MUSIC; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PAINTINGS; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79958106529     PISSN: 10900578     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Anderson, P.W. (1972). More is different, Science, 177, 393-396.
2. Boon, J.-P. & Decroly, O. (1995). Dynamical systems theory for music analysis, Chaos, 5, 501-508.
3. Campen, C. (1999). Artistic and psychological experiments with synesthesia, Leonardo, 32, 9-14.
4. Chaitin, G. J. (1969). On the length of programs for computing finite binary sequences. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 13, 547-569.
5. Cutting, J. E. & Garvin, J. J. (1987). Fractal curves and complexity, Perception and Psychophysics, 42, 365-370.
6. Fairbanks, M. S. & Taylor, R. P. (2010). Scaling analysis of spatial and temporal patterns: from the human eye to the foraging albatross. In S. J. Guastello & R. A. M. Gregson (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamical systems analysis for the behavioral sciences using real data (pp. 343-366). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis.
7. Gilden, D. L., Schmuckler, M. A. & Clayton, K. (1993). The perception of natural contour, Psychological Review, 100, 460-478.
8. Kolmogorov, A. N. (1965). Three approaches to the definition of quantity of information. Problems in Information Theory, 1, 1-7.
9. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
10. O'Connor, F. V., & Thaw, E. V., (1978). Jackson Pollock: A catalogue raisonne of paintings, drawings and other works. New Haven: Yale University Press.
11. Pentland, A.P. (1984) Fractal-based description of natural scenes, IEEE Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-6, 661-674.
12. Spehar, B., Clifford, C.W.G., Newell, B.R. & Taylor, R.P. (2003). Universal aesthetic of fractals, Chaos and Graphics, 27, 813-820.
13. Taylor, R. P. (2010). Chaos, fractals, nature: A new look at Jackson Pollock. In Fractals Research Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
14. Taylor, R. P., Guzman, R., Martin, T. M., Hall, G., Micolich, A. P., et al. (2007). Authenticating Pollock paintings with fractal geometry, Pattern Recognition Letters, 28, 695-702. (Pubitemid 46161850)
15. Taylor, R. P., Micolich, A. P. & Jonas, D. (1999). Fractal analysis of Pollock's drip paintings. Nature, 399, 422-423.
16. Taylor, R. P., Micolich, A. P. & Jonas, D., (2002). The construction of Pollock's fractal drip paintings, Leonardo, 35, 203-207.
17. Taylor, R. P., Spehar, B., Wise, J. A., Clifford, C. W. G. Newell, B. R., et al. (2005). Perceptual and physiological response to the visual complexity of fractals. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 9, 89-113.