Aggregation strategies for ssurgo data: Effects on swat soil inputs and hydrologic outputs

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1908-1921

  Gatzke, Sarah E ^a   Beaudette, Dylan E ^a   Ficklin, Darren L ^a   Luo, Yuzhou ^a,b   O'Geen, Anthony T ^a   Zhang, Minghua ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b California Department of Pesticide Regulation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION METHODS; AGGREGATION STRATEGY; DATA SETS; HYDROLOGIC MODELING; HYDROLOGIC MODELS; HYDROLOGIC PROCESS; LATERAL FLOW; MODEL EFFICIENCY; SAN JOAQUIN RIVER; SEDIMENT YIELDS; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL; SOIL DATA; SOIL PARAMETERS; SOIL PROPERTY; SOIL SURVEY MAPS; SOIL TAXONOMY; SOIL TYPES; SOIL WATER CONTENT; SUBBASINS; SURFACE RUNOFFS; SURVEY AREA; SWAT MODEL; UNIT DESIGN;

ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; LANDFORMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RIVERS; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL SURVEYS; WATERSHEDS;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

DATA SET; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; MAP; NUMERICAL MODEL; RUNOFF; SEDIMENT YIELD; SOIL CLASSIFICATION; SOIL PROPERTY; SOIL SURVEY; SOIL TYPE; SOIL WATER; WATER CONTENT; WATERSHED;

CALIFORNIA; SAN JOAQUIN BASIN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 82955193674     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2010.0418     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Arnold, J.G., R. Srinivasan, R.S. Muttiah, and J.R. Williams. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 34:73-89. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998. tb05961.x (Pubitemid 28190080)
2. Beaudette, D.E., and A.T. O'Geen. 2010. Algorithms for quantitative pedology: A toolkit for soil scientists. Code available at aqp.r-forge.r- project.org/(verifid 10 Aug. 2011).
3. California Department of Water Resources (DWR) 2007. Land use survey data. California Dep. of Water Resources, Sacramento.
4. Carré, F., and M.C. Girard. 2002. Quantitative mapping of soil types based on regression kriging of taxonomic distances withlandform and land cover attributes. Geoderma 110:241-263. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00233-1 (Pubitemid 35181379)
5. Carré, F., and M. Jacobson. 2009. Numerical classification of soil profile data using distance metrics. Geoderma 148:336-345. doi:10.1016/j. geoderma.2008.11.008
6. Chen, E., and D.S. Mackay. 2004. Effects of distribution-based parameter aggregation on a spatially distributed agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. J. Hydrol. 295:211-224. (Pubitemid 38893926)
7. Di Luzio, M., J.A. Arnold, and R. Srinivasan. 2004. Integration of SSURGO maps and soil parameters within a geographical information system and non point source pollution model. J. Soil Water Conserv. 59:123-133. (Pubitemid 39275215)
8. Donigian, A.S., B.R. Bicknell, and J.C. Imhoff. 1995. Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN (HSPF). p. 395-442. In V.P. Singh (ed.) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publ., Littleton, CO.
9. Drohan, P.J., E.J. Ciolkosz, and G.W. Petersen. 2003. Soil survey mapping unit accuracy in forested field plots in Northern Pennsylvania. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:208-214. (Pubitemid 36111227)
10. FitzHugh, T.W., and D.S. Mackay. 2000. Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation on an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. J. Hydrol. 236:35-53. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00276-6
11. Flugel, W. 1995. Delineating hydrologic response units by geographical information-system analyses for regional hydrological modeling using PRMS/MMS in the drainage-basin of the River BROL, Germany. Hydrol. Processes 9:423-436. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360090313 (Pubitemid 26441730)
12. Gassman, P., M. Reyes, C. Green, and J.A. Arnold. 2007. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical development, applications and future research directions. Trans. ASABE 50:1211-1250. (Pubitemid 47425666)
13. Geza, M., and J.E. McCray. 2008. Effects of soil data resolution on SWAT model stream flow and water quality predictions. J. Environ. Manage. 88:393-406. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.016 (Pubitemid 351696572)
14. Green, W., and G. Ampt. 1911. Studies on soil physics. J. Agric. Sci. 4:1-24. doi:10.1017/S0021859600001441
15. Kim, N.W., I.M. Chung, Y.S. Won, and J.G. Arnold. 2008. Development and application of the integrated SWAT-MODFLOW model. J. Hydrol. 356:1-16. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.02.024
16. Leavesley, G.H., R.W. Lichty, B.M. Troutman, and L.G. Saindon. 1983. Precipitation-runoffmodeling system: User's manual. U.S. Geol. Survey, Denver, CO.
17. Legesse, D., C. Vallet-Coulumb, and F. Gasse. 2003. Hydrologic response of a catchment to climate and land use changes in Tropical Africa: Case study SouthCentral Ethiopia. J. Hydrol. 275:67-85. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00019-2 (Pubitemid 36429601)
18. Lentz, R.D., and G.H. Simonson. 1987. Correspondence of soil properties and classification units withsagebrush communities in Southeastern Oregon: I. Comparisons between mono-taxa soil-vegetation units. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51:1263-1270.
19. Luo, Y., X. Zhang, X. Liu, D. Ficklin, and M. Zhang. 2008. Dynamic modeling of organophosphate pesticide load in surface water in the Northern San Joaquin Valley watershed of California. Environ. Pollut. 156:1171-1181. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2008.04.005
20. Mann, H., and D. Whitney. 1947. On a test of whether one of 2 random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Stat. 18:50-60. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730491
21. Migliaccio, K.W., and I. Chaubey. 2008. Spatial distributions and stochastic parameter influences on SWAT flow and sediment predictions. J. Hydrol. Eng. 13:258-269. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:4(258) (Pubitemid 351419948)
22. Nietsch, S.L., J.G. Arnold, J.R. Kiniry, J.R. Williams, and K.W. King. 2005. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical dDocumentation. Version 2005. Texas Water Resource Inst., College Station.
23. R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available at http://www.R-project.org/ (verified 10 Aug. 2011). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
24. Sloan, P., I. Moore, G. Coltharp, and J. Eigel. 1983. Modeling surface and subsurface stormflow on steeply-sloping forested watersheds. Rep. 142, Water Resources Inst., Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington.
25. Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1984. SCS National engineering handbook. USDA, Washington, DC.
26. Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. USDA-Natural Resources Conserv. Serv., Washington, DC.
27. USACE-HEC. 1998. HEC-HMS Hydrologic modeling system user's manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Hydrologic Engineering Ctr., Davis, CA.
28. USDA. 2007a. Soil survey geographic database. USDA, Washington, DC.
29. USDA. 2007b. State soil geographic database. USDA, Washington, DC.
30. USDA. 2009. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. Available at http://soils.usda.gov/technical/handbook/ (accessed 1 Jan. 2009; verified 3 Aug. 2011). USDA Natural Resources Conserv. Serv., Washington, DC.
31. Webster, R., and M. Oliver. 1990. Statistical methods in soil and land resource survey. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.
32. Williams, J. 1975. Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds. Water Resour. Bull. 11:965-974.