Dynamic modeling of organophosphate pesticide load in surface water in the northern San Joaquin Valley watershed of California

Environmental Pollution

Volumn 156, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1171-1181

  Luo, Yuzhou ^a,b   Zhang, Xuyang ^a   Liu, Xingmei ^a,c   Ficklin, Darren ^a   Zhang, Minghua ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b WENZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Pesticides; Sensitivity; SWAT; Water quality; Watershed

Indexed keywords

DISSOLUTION; EARTH SCIENCES; GEOLOGIC MODELS; HYDROLOGY; PESTICIDES; RAIN; SEDIMENTATION; SEDIMENTOLOGY; SOILS; STREAM FLOW; SURFACE WATERS; WATER; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS;

AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS; CALIFORNIA; CHLORPYRIFOS; CURVE NUMBERS; DYNAMIC MODELING; FATE AND TRANSPORTS; MAJOR FACTORS; ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES; PESTICIDE TRANSPORTS; SAN JOAQUIN VALLEYS; SATISFACTORY PREDICTIONS; SEDIMENT LOADS; SENSITIVITY; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOLS; SOIL PROPERTIES; SPATIAL PATTERNS; STUDY AREAS; SURFACE RUNOFFS; SWAT; SWAT MODELS; WATERSHED SCALES;

LANDFORMS;

CHLORPYRIFOS; DIMPYLATE; ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDE;

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; ORGANOPHOSPHATE; PESTICIDE; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; STREAMFLOW; SURFACE WATER; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

ARTICLE; LANDSCAPE; UNITED STATES; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

AGRICULTURE; CALIFORNIA; CHLORPYRIFOS; DIAZINON; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FRESH WATER; GEOLOGIC SEDIMENTS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; ORGANOPHOSPHORUS COMPOUNDS; PESTICIDES; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 55649118473     PISSN: 02697491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.S., and Williams J.R. Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment. Part I. Model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34 (1998) 73-89
2. ASCE. Criteria for evaluation of watershed models, by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Task Committee on definition of criteria for evaluation of watershed models of the Watershed Management Committee, Irrigation and Drainage Division. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 119 (1993) 429-442
3. CDFA. Fertilizing Materials: Tonnage Reports, 1971-2006 (2006), California Department of Food and Agriculture
4. CDPR. Pesticide Use Reporting (PUR) (2007), California Department of Pesticide Regulation
5. CEPA. Amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Runoff into the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (2006), California Environmental Protection Agency
6. CEPA. San Joaquin River Watershed Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) (2007), California Environmental Protection Agency
7. CEPA. Surface Water Database (2007), California Environmental Protection Agency
8. Chapra S.C. Surface Water-quality Modeling (1997), WCB/McGraw-Hill, Boston
9. Deksissa T., De Pauw D., and Vanrolleghem P.A. Dynamic instream fate modelling of xenobiotic organic compounds: a case study of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in the Lambro River, Italy. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 23 (2004) 2267-2278
10. Di Luzio M., Srinivasan R., and Arnold J.G. A GIS-coupled hydrological model system for the water assessment of agricultural nonpoint and point sources of pollution. Transactions in GIS 8 (2004) 113-136
11. Domagalski J.L., and Munday C. Evaluation of Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Concentrations and Loads, and Other Pesticide Concentrations, at Selected Sites in the San Joaquin Valley, California, April to August, 2001 (2003), United States Geologic Survey
12. Du B., Saleh A., Jaynes D.B., and Arnold J.G. Evaluation of SWAT in simulating nitrate nitrogen and atrazine fates in watershed with tiles and potholes. Transaction of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) 49 (2006) 949-959
13. Dubrovsky N.M., Kratzer C.R., Brown L.R., Gronberg J.M., and Burow K.R. Water Quality in the San Joaquin-Tulare Basins, California, 1992-1995 (1998), United States Geological Survey
14. Gassman P.W., Reyes M.R., Green C.H., and Arnold J.G. The soil and water assessment tools: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Transaction of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) 50 (2007) 1211-1250
15. Gilroy E.J., Hirsch R.M., and Cohn T. Mean square error of regression-based constituent transport estimates. Water Resources Research 26 (1990) 2069-2077
16. Helsel D.H., and Cohn T. Estimation of descriptive statistics for multiply-censored water-quality data. Water Resources Research 24 (1988) 1997-2004
17. Holvoet K., van Griensven A., Seuntjens P., and Vanrolleghem P.A. Sensitivity analysis for hydrology and pesticide supply towards the river in SWAT. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 30 (2005) 518-526
18. Kannan N., White S.M., Worrall F., and Whelan M.J. Pesticide modeling for a small catchment using SWAT-2000. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B 41 (2006) 1049-1070
19. King J., Dellavalle N., Beckley S., Munk D., Spangler S., Holden D., Fry R., and Pettygrove G.S. Air Quality and Fertilization Practices: Establishing a Calendar of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Timing Practices for Major Crops in the San Joaquin Valley (1998), California Department of Food and Agriculture
20. Kratzer C.R., and Shelton J.L. Water Quality Assessment of the San Joaquin-Tulare Basins, California: Analysis of Available Data on Nutrients and Suspended Sediment in Surface Water, 1972-1990 (1998), United States Geological Survey
21. Kratzer C.R., Zamora C., and Knifong D.L. Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Loads in the San Joaquin River Basin, California, January and February 2000 (2002), United States Geological Survey
22. Larose M., Heathman G.C., Norton L.D., and Engel B. Hydrologic and atrazine simulation of the Cedar Creek Watershed using the SWAT model. Journal of Environmental Quality 36 (2007) 521-531
23. Lim, K.J., Engel, B., Hetzroni, A., 2001. Incorporation and evaluation of a river quality model to NAPRA WWW decision support system. Paper No. 012127. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Annual International Meeting, St. Joseph, Michigan.
24. Luo Y., and Yang X. A multimedia environmental model of chemical distribution: fate, transport, and uncertainty analysis. Chemosphere 66 (2007) 1396-1407
25. McKone T.E., Castorina R., Harnly M.E., Kuwabara Y., Eskenazi B., and Bradman A. Merging models and biomonitoring data to characterize sources and pathways of human exposure to organophosphorus pesticides in the Salinas Valley of California. Environmental Science & Technology 41 (2007) 3233-3240
26. MID. Merced Irrigation District Audited Financial Statements, 2004 (2004), Merced Irrigation District, Merced, California
27. NADP. National Atmospheric Deposition Program Annual Summary. National Atmospheric Deposition Program (2007), University of Illinois and Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Champaign, Illinois
28. Nash J.E., and Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part I. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10 (1976) 282-290
29. Neitsch S.L., Arnold J.G., Kiniry J.R., and Williams J.R. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation, Version 2005 (2005), Agricultural Research Service and Blackland Research Centre, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
30. Novotny V. Water Quality Prevention, Identification and Management of Diffuse Pollution (1994), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ
31. Potter C., Krauter C., and Klooster S. Statewide Inventory Estimates of Ammonia Emissions from Native Soil and Chemical Fertilizers in California (2001), California Environmental Protection Agency
32. Quinn N.W.T., and Tulloch A. San Joaquin River Diversion Data Assimilation, Drainage Estimation and Installation of Diversion Monitoring Stations (2002), CALFED Bay-Delta Program, Sacramento, CA
33. Rauschkolb R.S., and Mikkelsen D.S. Survey of Fertilizer use in California 1973 (1978), Division of Agricultural Sciences, Cooperative Extension, University of California, Berkeley, California
34. Ruiz C.E., and Gerald T. RECOVERY Version 2.0. A Mathematical Model to Predict the Temporal Response of Surface Water to Contaminated Sediments (2001), United States Army Corps of Engineers
35. SAS. Base SAS 9.1 Procedures Guide (2004), SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA
36. Schoups G., Hopmans J.W., Young C.A., Vrugt J.A., Wallender W.W., Tanji K.K., and Panday S. Sustainability of irrigated agriculture in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 (2005) 15352-15356
37. TetraTech. Progress Report, Ecoregion 6 (Southern and Central California Oak and Chaparral Woodlands) Pilot Study for the Development of Nutrient Criteria (2003), Tetra Tech, Inc., Lafayette, California
38. TetraTech. Progress Report White Papers in Support of the Development of Nutrient Criteria in California (2004), Tetra Tech, Inc., Lafayette, California
39. USDA. Agricultural Research Service (ARS) Pesticide Properties Database (2001), United States Department of Agriculture
40. USDA. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database (2007), United States Department of Agriculture
41. USEPA. Guidance for Selecting Input Parameters in Modeling the Environmental Fate and Transport of Pesticides, Version II (2002), Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
42. USEPA. Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM) Field and Orchard Crop Scenarios: Guidance for Selecting Field Crop and Orchard Scenario Input Parameters (2004), Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
43. USEPA. Data for the Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources (BASINS) Model (2007), United States Environmental Protection Agency
44. USGS. Organophosphorus Pesticide Occurrence and Distribution in Surface and Ground Water of the United States, 1992-97 (2000), United States Geological Survey
45. USGS. National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2001 (2001), U.S. Geological Survey, Earth Resources Observation Systems
46. USGS. National Water Information System: Web Interface (2007), United States Geographical Survey
47. Van Liew M.W., and Garbrecht J. Hydrologic simulation of the Little Washita River experimental watershed using SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39 (2003) 413-426
48. Vazquez-Amabile G., Engel B.A., and Flanagan D.C. Modeling and risk analysis of nonpoint-source pollution caused by atrazine using SWAT. Transaction of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) 49 (2006) 667-678
49. Winchell M., Srinivasan R., Di Luzio M., and Arnold J. ArcSWAT Interface for SWAT2005 User's Guide (2007), Texas Agricultural Experiment Station and United States Department of Agriculture, Temple, TX
50. Yu C., Northcott W.J., and McIsaac G.F. Development of an artificial neural network for hydrologic and water quality modeling of agricultural watersheds. Transaction of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) 47 (2004) 285-290