Whole-body MRI in preoperative diagnostics of breast cancer a comparison of staging methods according to the S3 guidelines;Ganzkörper-MRT in der präoperativen Diagnostik des Mammakarzinoms ein Vergleich mit den Stagingmethoden in der S3-Leitlinie

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 183, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1130-1137

  Hausmann, D ^a   Kern, C ^b   Schroder M T ^c   Sutterlin M ^a   Schonberg S O ^a   Neff, K W ^a   Dinter, D J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b Institut fur Radiologie   (Germany)

^c STÄDTISCHES KLINIKUM KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

breast; metastases; MR imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE SCINTISCANNING; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LIVER SCINTISCANNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; METASTASIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; WHOLE BODY MRI;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; GERMANY; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEOPLASMS, MULTIPLE PRIMARY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

EID: 82955193241     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281723     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Albert U S., Altland H, Duda V et al. Kurzfassung der aktualisierten Stufe-3-Leitlinie Brustkrebs-Früherkennung in Deutschland 2008. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2008 180 455-465 (Pubitemid 351993198)
2. Heussel C P., Sandner A, Voigtlander T et al. Prospektive Machbarkeitsstudie zum Vergleich von Röntgenübersichtsaufnahme und Thorax-MRT in Atemanhaltetechnik am offenen Niederfeldgerät. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002 174 854-861
3. Kinkel K, Lu Y, Both M et al. Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis. Radiology 2002 224 748-756 (Pubitemid 34919808)
4. Ghanem N, Kelly T, Altehoefer C et al. Ganzkörper-MRT vs. Skelettszintigraphie bei der Detektion ossärer Metastasen solider Tumoren. Radiologe 2004 44 864-873 (Pubitemid 39362019)
5. Engelhard K, Hollenbach H P., Wohlfart K et al. Comparison of whole-body MRI with automatic moving table technique and bone scintigraphy for screening for bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2004 14 99-105 (Pubitemid 38181060)
6. Curati W L., Halevy A, Gibson R N. et al. Ultrasound, CT, and MRI comparison in primary and secondary tumors of the liver. Gastrointest Radiol 1988 13 123-128 (Pubitemid 18082094)
7. Schweitzer M E., Levine C, Mitchell D G. et al. Bulls-eyes and halos: useful MR discriminators of osseous metastases. Radiology 1993 188 249-252 (Pubitemid 23183133)
8. Walker R, Kessar P, Blanchard R et al. Turbo STIR magnetic resonance imaging as a whole-body screening tool for metastases in patients with breast carcinoma: preliminary clinical experience. JMagn Reson Imaging 2000 11 343-350 (Pubitemid 30185873)
9. Lauenstein T C., Goehde S C., Herborn C U. et al. Whole-body MR imaging: evaluation of patients for metastases. Radiology 2004 233 139-148 (Pubitemid 39280968)
10. Schmidt G P., Baur-Melnyk A, Haug A et al. Comprehensive imaging of tumor recurrence in breast cancer patients using whole-body MRI at 1.5 and 3T compared to FDG-PET-CT. Eur J Radiol 2008 65 47-58
11. Schafer J F., Vollmar J, Schick F et al. Bildgebende Diagnostik solitärer Lungenrundherde am offenen Niederfeld-MRT Ein Vergleich zweier MR-Sequenzen mit der Spiral-CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002 174 1107-1114
12. Kauczor H U., Kreitner K F. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the lung. Eur J Radiol 2000 34 196-207
13. Brogdon B G., Kelsey C A., Moseley Jr R D. Factors affecting perception of pulmonary lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 1983 21 633-654 (Pubitemid 14209747)
14. Vogt F M., Herborn C U., Hunold P et al. HASTE MRI versus chest radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules: comparison with MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 2004 183 71-78 (Pubitemid 38789014)
15. Bruegel M, Gaa J, Woertler K et al. MRI of the lung: value of different turbo spin-echo, single-shot turbo spin-echo, and 3D gradient-echo pulse sequences for the detection of pulmonary metastases. JMagn Reson Imaging 2007 25 73-81 (Pubitemid 46095201)
16. Fink C, Puderbach M, Biederer J et al. Lung MRI at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: observer preference study and lesion contrast using five different pulse sequences. Invest Radiol 2007 42 377-383 (Pubitemid 46788736)
17. Wernecke K, Rummeny E, Bongartz G et al. Detection of hepatic masses in patients with carcinoma: comparative sensitivities of sonography, CT, and MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1991 157 731-739
18. Dietrich C F., Kratzer W, Strobe D et al. Assessment of metastatic liver disease in patients with primary extrahepatic tumors by contrast-enhanced sonography versus CT and MRI. World J Gastroenterol 2006 12 1699-1705
19. Hammerstingl R, Huppertz A, Breuer J et al. Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid (Primovist)-enhanced MRI and spiral CT for a therapeutic strategy: comparison with intraoperative and histopathologic findings in focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol 2008 18 457-467 (Pubitemid 351248177)
20. Traill Z C., Talbot D, Golding S et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus radionuclide scintigraphy in screening for bone metastases. Clin Radiol 1999 54 448-451 (Pubitemid 29355976)
21. Schmidt G P., Schoenberg S O., Schmid R et al. Screening for bone metastases: whole-body MRI using a 32-channel system versus dual-modality PET-CT. Eur Radiol 2007 17 939-949 (Pubitemid 46766875)
22. Lauenstein T C., Freudenberg L S., Goehde S C. et al. Whole-body MRI using a rolling table platform for the detection of bone metastases. Eur Radiol 2002 12 2091-2099 (Pubitemid 36940299)
23. Steinborn M M., Heuck A F., Tiling R et al. Whole-body bone marrow MRI in patients with metastatic disease to the skeletal system. JComput Assist Tomogr 1999 23 123-129 (Pubitemid 29095482)
24. Ketelsen D, Rothke M, Aschoff P et al. Ossäre Metastasen bei Prostata-CA Ganzkörper-MRT vs. Szintigraphie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2008 180 746-752
25. Ohlmann-Knafo S, Kirschbaum M, Fenzl G et al. Diagnostischer Stellenwert der Ganzkörper-MRT und der Skelettszintigrafie in der ossären Metastasendetektion bei Mammakarzinompatientinnen eine prospektive Doppelblindstudie an zwei Klinikzentren. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 255-263
26. Petren-Mallmin M, Andreasson I, Nyman R et al. Detection of breast cancer metastases in the cervical spine. Acta Radiol 1993 34 543-548 (Pubitemid 23347379)
27. Hamaoka T, Madewell J E., Podoloff D A. et al. Bone imaging in metastatic breast cancer. JClin Oncol 2004 22 2942-2953 (Pubitemid 41079914)
28. Plathow C, Walz M, Lichy M P. et al. Kostenüberlegungen zur Ganzkörper-MRT und PET-CT im Rahmen des onkologischen Stagings. Radiologe 2008 48 384-396 (Pubitemid 351720456)
29. Beinfeld M T., Gazelle G S. Diagnostic imaging costs: are they driving up the costs of hospital care? Radiology 2005 235 934-939 (Pubitemid 40695892)
30. Casarella W J. A patients viewpoint on a current controversy. Radiology 2002 224 927