Factors related to the implementation and use of an innovation in cancer surgery

Current Oncology

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 271-279

  Urquhart, Robin ^a,b   Sargeant, J ^b,c   Porter, G A ^a,c,d  

^a Cancer Care Nova Scotia   (Canada)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d QUEEN ELIZABETH II HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cancer; Implementation; Surgery; Synoptic reporting

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SURGERY; CANADA; CANCER SURGERY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL SURGERY; EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL RECORD; NARRATIVE; PATIENT CARE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SPECIALIZATION; SURGEON; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; WEB BROWSER;

EID: 82955172961     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17187729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3747/co.v18i6.961     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Moore RA. The dictated operative note: important but is it being taught? J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:639-40.
2. Beattie GC, McAdam TK, Elliott S, Sloan JM, Irwin ST. Improvement in quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting with a standardized proforma-a comparative study. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:558-62.
3. Edhemovic I, Temple WJ, de Gara CJ, Stuart GC. The computer synoptic operative report-a leap forward in the science of surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:941-7.
4. Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:626-32.
5. Bilimoria KY, Phillips JD, Rock CE, Hayman A, Prystowsky JB, Bentrem DJ. Effect of surgeon training, specialization, and experience on outcomes for cancer surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:1799-808.
6. Chambers AJ, Pasieka JL, Temple WJ. Improvement in the accuracy of reporting key prognostic and anatomic findings during thyroidectomy by using a novel Web-based synoptic operative reporting system. Surgery 2009;146:1090-8.
7. Park J, Pillarisetty VG, Brennan MF, et al. Electronic synoptic operative reporting: assessing the reliability and completeness of synoptic reports for pancreatic resection. J Am Coll Surg 2010;211:308-15.
8. Srigley JR, McGowan T, Maclean A, et al. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach. J Surg Oncol 2009;99:517-24.
9. Wilkinson NW, Shahryarinejad A, Winston JS, Watroba N, Edge SB. Concordance with breast cancer pathology reporting practice guidelines. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:38-43.
10. Mack LA, Dabbs K, Temple WJ. Synoptic operative record for point of care outcomes: a leap forward in knowledge translation. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010;36(suppl 1):S44-9.
11. Urquhart R, Grunfeld E, Porter GA. Synoptic reporting and the quality of cancer care: a review of evidence and Canadian initiatives. Oncol Exch 2009;8:28-31.
12. Kitson AL, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the parihs framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci 2008;3:1.
13. Helfrich CD, Weiner BJ, McKinney MM, Minasian L. Determinants of implementation effectiveness: adapting a framework for complex innovations. Med Care Res Rev 2007;64:279-303.
14. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2009.
15. Ferlie EB, Shortell SM. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Q 2001;79:281-315.
16. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002: 3-39.
17. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77-101.
18. Bradley EH, Holmboe ES, Mattera JA, Roumanis SA, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. A qualitative study of increasing betablocker use after myocardial infarction: why do some hospitals succeed? JAMA 2001;285:2604-11.
19. Soo S, Berta W, Baker GR. Role of champions in the implementation of patient safety practice change. Healthc Q 2009;12:123-8.
20. Kitson AL. The need for systems change: reflections on knowledge translation and organizational change. J Adv Nurs 2009;65:217-28.
21. Klein KJ, Sorra JS. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manage Rev 1996;21:1055-80.
22. Folkes A, Urquhart R, Zitzelsberger L, Grunfeld E. Breast cancer guidelines in Canada: a review of development and implementation. Breast Care (Basel) 2008;3:108-13.
23. Stange KC, Goodwin MA, Zyzanski SJ, Dietrich AJ. Sustainability of a practice-individualized preventive service delivery intervention. Am J Prev Med 2003;25:296-300.
24. Wilson KD, Kurz RS. Bridging implementation and institutionalization within organizations: proposed employment of continuous quality improvement to further dissemination. J Public Health Manag Pract 2008;14:109-16.
25. Grol RP, Bosch MC, Hulscher ME, Eccles MP, Wensing M. Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q 2007;85:93-138.