Regulating patents

Supreme Court Review

Volumn 2010, Issue , 2010, Pages 275-326

  Masur, Jonathan S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82955165241     PISSN: 00819557     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1086/659063     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. See Adam Hinterthuer, Just How Harmful Are Bisphenol A Plastics? Scientific American (Aug 26, 2008), online at http://www.scientificamerican.com/ article.cfm?idpjust-howharmful-are-bisphenol-a-plastics.
2. See generally Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley, The Patent Crisis and How the Courts Can Solve It 21 (Chicago, 2009)
3. James Bessen and Michael J. Meurer, Patent Failure (Princeton, 2008)
4. Adam B. Jaffe and Josh Lerner, Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It (Princeton, 2004).
5. See Mark A. Lemley, Ten Things to Do About Patent Holdup of Standards (and One Not to), 48 BC L Rev 148, 149 (2007).
6. See, for example, Joe Mullin, Supreme Skepticism Over Bilski Claims Puts Method Patents on Shaky Ground, AmLaw Daily (Nov 9, 2009), online at http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/ amlawdaily/2009/11/bilski.html
7. Tony Mauro, Bilski Case Provokes Patent Skepticism from Justices, BLT: The Blog of Legal Times (Nov 9, 2009), online at http://legaltimes .typepad.com/blt/2009/11/bilski-case-provokes-patent-skepticism-from-justices. html.
8. See, for example, Richard A. Epstein, The Disintegration of Intellectual Property? A Classical Liberal Response to a Premature Obituary, 62 Stan L Rev 455, 484 (2010)
9. See Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley, Policy Levers in Patent Law, 89 Va L Rev 1575, 1674-75 (2003).
10. See Federal Circuit-Judicial Biographies, available online at http://www.cafc .uscourts.gov/judgbios.html.
11. See Richard L. Hasen, Clipping Coupons for Democracy: An Egalitarian/Public Choice Defense of Campaign Finance Vouchers, 84Cal L Rev 1, 10 (1996)
12. See, for example, Lior Jacob Strahilevitz, Informational Asymmetries and the Rights to Exclude, 104Mich L Rev 1835, 1843 (2006) (describing "zoning laws and environmental regulations" as typical land use governance mechanisms).
13. See Arti K. Rai, Growing Pains in the Administrative State: The Patent Office's Troubled Quest for Managerial Control, 157 U Pa L Rev 2051, 2054(2009).
14. See Matthew C. Stephenson, Optimal Political Control of the Bureaucracy, 107 Mich L Rev 53 (2008) (arguing that the optimal arrangement may be some type of power sharing between agencies and the President)
15. Jonathan S. Masur and Jonathan Remy Nash, The Institutional Dynamics of Transition Relief, 85 NYU L Rev 391, 435-440 (2010).
16. See Megan E. Lyman, Judicial Fitness for Review of Complex Biotechnology Issues in Patent Litigation: Technical Claim Interpretation, 23 J NAALJ 503, 509 (2003) (noting that PTO guidelines incorporate Federal Circuit opinions and do little else).
17. See William J. Stuntz, The Pathological Politics of Criminal Law, 100 Mich L Rev 505, 506 (2001).