"Show me your impact": Evaluating transitional justice in contested spaces

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 199-205

  Duggan, Colleen ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Complexity evaluation; Outcome Mapping; Peacebuilding evaluation; Post conflict evaluation; Transitional justice

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN RIGHTS; INTERNATIONAL AID; MUSEUM; NUMERICAL MODEL;

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; GUATEMALA; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; METHODOLOGY; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; VIOLENCE;

ATTITUDE; GUATEMALA; HUMAN RIGHTS; HUMANS; PREJUDICE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOCIAL JUSTICE; VIOLENCE;

GUATEMALA [CENTRAL AMERICA];

EID: 82855181495     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adams T. Notes on the social impacts of the campaign to date, lessons learned and challenges for the future 2007, Instituto Internacional de Aprendizaje para la Reconciliación Social (IIARS), Guatemala, (Internal document).
2. Adams T. Proposal to develop an educational strategy or teaching about racism and ethnic equality in Guatemala: Por Qué Estamos Como Estamos? 2007-2011 2007, Instituto Internacional de Aprendizaje para la Reconciliación Social (IIARS), Guatemala, (Internal document).
3. Agreeent on Identity and Rights of Indigenous Peoples. (1995). Washington: United States Institute for Peace, Peace Agreements, Digital Collection.
4. Bakewell O., Garbutt A. The use and abuse of the logical framework approach 2005, SIDA, Stockholm.
5. Bickford L. Transitional justice in the encyclopaedia of genocide and crimes against humanity 2004, Vol. 3. MacMillan, New York, USA.
6. Bickford L., Schultz D. Memory and justice confronting past atrocity of human rights abuse 2008, International Centre for Transitional Justice, New York.
7. Brahm E. Uncovering the truth: Examining truth commission success and impact. International Studies Perspectives 2007, 8:16-35.
8. Centre for Global Development. (2006). When will we ever learn? Improving lives through impact evaluation. Report of the Evaluation Gap Working Group, Washington.
9. Centro de Investigaciones Regionales de Meso América - CIRMA Final technical report for project 'global monitoring proposal for CIRMA's national campaign for dialogue and interethnic relations' 2008, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa.
10. Cole E.A. Transitional justice and the reform of history education. International Journal of Transitional Justice 2007, 1(1):115-137.
11. Commission for Historical Clarification. (1999). Guatemala memory of silence: The report of the commission for historical clarification - Summary and conclusions. Washington: AAAS Science and Human Rights Data Center. Available from: http://shr.aaas.org/guatemala/ceh/report/english/toc.html.
12. Earl S., Carden F., Smutylo T. Outcome mapping building learning and reflection into development programs 2001, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa.
13. Evaluation Unit Annual corporate evaluation report 2008, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa.
14. Mendeloff D. Truth-seeking, truth-telling, and postconflict peacebuilding: Curb the enthusiasm?. International Studies Review 2004, 6(3):355-380.
15. Ortiz S N. Participatory evaluation of the monitoring and evaluation system of the national campaign for dialogue and interethnic relations 'our diversity is our strength' 2008, Instituto Internacional para la Reconciliation Social, Guatemala.
16. Patton M.Q. Utilization focused evaluation. The new century text 2008, Sage. 4th ed.
17. Pham P., Vinck P. Empirical research and the development and assessment of transitional justice mechanisms. International Journal of Transitional Justice 2007, 1(2):231-248.
18. Ravallion, M. (2009). Should the Randomistas rule? Economists voice, February. Available from: http://www.bepress.com/ev/vol6/iss2/art6.
19. Shapiro, I. (2005). Theories of change, January. Available from: http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/theories_of_change/.
20. Thoms O.N.t, Ron J., Paris R. The effects of transitional justice mechanisms. A summary of empiric research findings and implications for analysts and practitioners centre for international policy studies 2008, University of Ottawa, Ottawa.
21. United Nations General Assembly. (2008). Review of results-based management at the United Nations. 22 September 2008. A/63/268.
22. Vinjamuri L., Snyder J. Advocacy and scholarship in the study of international war crimes tribunals and transitional justice. Annual Review of Political Science 2004, 7(May):345-362.
23. Weiss C.H. Theory-based evaluation: Past, present, and future. Progress and future direc ons in evaluation: Perspectives on theory, practice, and methods 1997, 76. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. D. Rog, D. Fournier (Eds.).