Advocacy and scholarship in the study of international war crime tribunals and transitional justice

Annual Review of Political Science

Volumn 7, Issue , 2004, Pages 345-362

  Vinjamuri, Leslie ^a   Snyder, Jack ^b  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142658860     PISSN: 10942939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104755     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Akhavan P. 2001. Beyond impunity: Can international criminal justice prevent future atrocities? Am. J. Int. Law 95(1):7-31
2. Alvarez J. 1999. Crimes of states/crimes of hate: lessons from Rwanda. Yale J. Int. Law 24:365-483
3. Bass G. 2000. Staying the Hand of Vengeance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
4. Bass G. 2003. Milosevic in The Hague. For. Aff. 82(3):82-96
5. Bassiouni MC, ed. 2002. Post-Conflict Justice. Ardsley, NY: Transnational
6. Bassiouni MC. 2002a. Accountability for violations of international humanitarian law and other serious violations of human rights. See Bassiouni 2002, pp. 3-54
7. Bassiouni MC. 2002b. Appendix: the Princeton principles on universal jurisdiction. 2002. See Bassiouni 2002, pp. 1003-5
8. Bassiouni MC. 2002c. The universal model: the international criminal court. See Bassiouni 2002, pp. 813-28
9. Bassiouni MC. 2002d. Universal jurisdiction for international crimes: historical perspectives and contemporary practice. See Bassiouni 2002, pp. 945-1002
10. Boed R. 2002. The international criminal tribunal for Rwanda. See Bassiouni 2002, pp. 487-98
11. Borraine A. 2000. A Country Unmasked. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
12. Elster J. 1998. Coming to terms with the past: a framework for the study of justice in the transition to democracy. Arch. Ear. Soc. 39(1):748
13. Elster J. 1999. Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
14. Falk R. 1999. The pursuit of international justice: present dilemmas and an imagined future. J. Int. Aff. 52(2):440
15. Gibson JL. 2002. Truth, justice, and reconciliation: judging the fairness of amnesty in South Africa. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 46(3):540-56
16. Gibson JL. 2003. Overcoming Intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in Democratic Persuasion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
17. Gibson JL, Gouws A. 1999. Truth and reconciliation in South Africa: attributions of blame and the struggle over apartheid. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 93(3):501-18
18. Goldsmith J, Krasner SD. 2003. The limits of idealism. Daedalus 132(1):47-63
19. Goodwin J. 2001. Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
20. Hayner P. 2001. Unspeakable Truths: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity. New York: Routledge
21. Horowitz D. 2001. The Deadly Ethnic Riot. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
22. Huntington SP. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, pp. 211-225. Norman: Univ. Okla. Press
23. Joyner CC. 1996. Arresting impunity: the case for universal jurisdiction in bringing war criminals to accountability. Law Contemp. Prob. 59:153
24. Kaufman SJ. 2001. Modern Hatreds: The Symbolic Politics of Ethnic War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
25. Kiss E. 2000. Moral ambition within and beyond political constraints: reflections on restorative justice. See Rotberg & Thompson 2000, pp. 216-30
26. Kissinger H. 2001. The pitfalls of universal jurisdiction. For. Aff. 80(4):94-95
27. Kritz NJ. 1996. Coming to terms with atrocities: a review of accountability mechanisms for mass violations of human rights. Law Contemp. Prob. 59:127
28. Long WJ, Brecke P. 2003. War and Reconciliation: Reason and Emotion in Conflict Resolution. Cambridge, MA: MET Press
29. Maguire P. 2000. Law and War: An American Story. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
30. Malamud-Goti J. 1990. Transitional governments in the breach: Why punish state criminals? Hum. Rights Q. 12(1):1
31. Mayerfeld J. 2001. The mutual dependence of external and internal justice: the democratic achievement of the international criminal court, Finn. Yearb. Int. Law. 12:107
32. Meron T. 1993. The case for war crimes trials in Yugoslavia. For. Aff. 72(3):122-35
33. Meron T. 1997. Answering for war crimes: lessons from the Balkans. For. Aff. 76(1):2-8
34. Meron T. 1998. War Crimes Law Comes of Age: Essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
35. Minow M. 1998. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence, p. 50. Boston: Beacon
36. Minow M. 2000. The hope for healing: What can truth commissions do? See Rotberg & Thompson 2000, pp. 235-60
37. Morris MH. 1996. International guidelines against impunity: facilitating accountability. Law Contemp. Prob. 59(29):29-40
38. Nino C. 1996. Radical Evil on Trial. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press
39. Orentlicher DF. 1991. Settling accounts: the duty to prosecute human rights violations of a prior regime. Yale Law J. 100(8):2537-615
40. Petersen R. 2002. Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, and Resentment in Twentieth Century Eastern Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
41. Pupavac V. 2001. Therapeutic governance: psycho-social intervention and trauma risk management. Disasters 25(4):358-72
42. Robertson G. 1999. Crimes Against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice. New York: New Press
43. Roehrig T. 2002. The Prosecution of Former Military Leaders in Newly Democratic Nations: The Cases of Argentina, Greece, and South Korea. Jefferson, NC/London: Mc-Farland
44. Rosenberg T. 1995. Tipping the scales of justice. World Polit. J. 12(3):55-64
45. Rotberg RI, Thompson D, eds. 2000, Truth vs. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
46. Roth K. 1998. The court the US doesn't want. NY Rev. Books 45(18):45-47
47. Roth K. 1999. Speech One: Endorse the International Criminal Court, 19-36, In Slaughter AM, Roth K, Bolton J, Wedgwood R. 1999. Toward an International Criminal Court? New York: Council on Foreign Relations
48. Schabas WA. 2001. An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, p. 19. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
49. Scharf MP. 1999. Responding to Rwanda: accountability mechanisms in the aftermath of genocide. J. Int. Aff. 52(2):621-46
50. Seils P. 2002. The limits of truth commissions in the search for justice: an analysis of the truth commissions of El Salvador and Guatemala and their effect in achieving post-conflict justice. See Bassiouni 2002, pp. 775-95
51. Shklar J. 1964. Legalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
52. Sieff M, Vinjamuri L. 2002. Prosecuting war criminals: an argument for decentralization. Conf. Sec. Dev. 2(2): 103-13
53. Snyder J, Vinjamuri L. 2003/2004. Trials and errors: principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice. Int. Sec. 28(3)
54. Stepan A. 1986. Paths toward redemocratization: theoretical and comparative considerations. In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, ed. G O'Donnell, P Schmitter, L Whitehead, p. 64. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
55. Teitel R. 1999. Bringing the messiah through the law. In Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia, ed. C Hesse, R Post, pp. 177-93. New York: Zone Books
56. Teitel RG. 2000. Transitional Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
57. van Zyl P. 2002. Unfinished business: the truth and reconciliation commission's contribution to justice in post-apartheid South Africa. See Bassiouni 2002, pp. 745-60
58. Vinjamuri L. 2003. Order and justice in Iraq. Survival 45(4):135-52
59. Wedgwood R. 1998. Fiddling in Rome: America and the international criminal court. For. Aff. 77(6):20-24
60. Zalaquett J. 1995. Confronting human rights violations committed by former governments: principles applicable and political constraints. In Transitional Justice, ed. N Kritz, 1:3-31. Washington, DC: U.S. Inst. Peace