Economic valuation of the emas waterfall, Mogi-Guaçu river, SP, Brazil

Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias

Volumn 83, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1287-1301

  Peixer, Janice ^a   Giacomini, Henrique C ^a   Petrere Jr , Miguel ^b,c,d  

^a Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSIDADE DO ESTADO DO AMAZONAS   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSIDADE NILTON LINS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation method; Professional fishing; Sport fishing; Tourism; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

EID: 82855179398     PISSN: 00013765     EISSN: 16782690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0001-37652011000400016     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. BAKER DL AND PIERCE BE. 1997. Does fisheries management reflect societal values? Contingent Valuation evidence for the River Murray. Fish Manag Ecol 4: 1-15.
2. BENI CB. 1998. Análise estrutural do turismo. Editora Senac, São Paulo, 427 p.
3. Breedlove J. 1999. Natural Resources: assessing nonmarket values through contingent valuation. CRS Report for Congress. Available from URL: http://www.ncseonlineaorg/NLE/CRSreports/Natural/nrgen-24.cfm (acessed in 05/01/2005).
4. Brigante J ET AL. 2002. Avaliação ambiental do Rio Mogi-Guaçu: resultados de uma pesquisa com abordagem ecossistêmica. São Carlos: Rima Editora, 58 p.
5. Campbell D. 2007. Willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements: combining mixed logit and random-effects models. J Agric Econ 58(3): 467-483.
6. Cantrell RN et al. 2004. Recreational anglers' willingness to pay for increased catch rates of Pacific threadfin (Polydactylus sexfilis) in Hawaii. Fish Res (68): 149-158.
7. Carvalho AR. 2002. Valoração econômico-ecológica da planície de inundação do Alto Rio Paraná. PhD Thesis, Ecology of Aquatic Continental Environments, Maringá State University, Maringá, 112 p.
8. Carvalho AR. 2007. An ecological economic approach to estimate the value of a fragmented wetland in Brazil (Mato Grosso do Sul State). Braz J Biol 67(4): 663-671.
9. Cbh-Mogi and Creupi. 1999. Diagnóstico da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Mogi-Guaçu "Relatório Zero". Available from URL: http://www.sigrh.sp.gov.br/sigrh/ARQS/RELATORIO/CRH/CBHMOGI/130/relmogiseg.pdf (accessed in 10/08/2006).
10. Champ P et al. 1997. Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods. J Env Econ Manag 33(2): 151-163.
11. Costanza R. 1991. Assuring sustainability of ecological economic systems. In: COSTANZA R (Ed), Ecological Economics: the science and management of sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press, p. 331-343.
12. Dietz BC. 2001. An analysis of statistical errors in contingent valuation surveys, Proceedings of the American Agricultural Economics Association Summer Meetings, 5-8 Aug 2001, Chicago, United States of America, 37 p. http://agecon.lib.umn.edu (accessed 25/05/2006).
13. Fearnside PM. 1997. Environmental services as a strategy for sustainable development in rural Amazonia. Ecol Econ 20: 53-70.
14. Godoy MP. 1974. Contribuição à história natural e geral de Pirassununga. Manuscrito, v.1, Pirassununga.
15. Hosmer DW and Lemeshow S. 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley-Interscience publication, 307 p.
16. Kleinbaum DG. 1996. Logistic Regression. ASelf-learning Text. New York: Springer, 282 p.
17. Loomis J et al. 2000. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecol Econ 33: 103-117.
18. Manly BFJ. 2004. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in Biology. Otago: University of Otago, 330 p.
19. Martins EC. 2002. O Turismo como alternativa de desenvolvimento sustentável: o caso de Jericoacoara no Ceará. PhD Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo - ESALq, Piracicaba, SP, 164 p.
20. Mattos KMC and Mattos A. 2004. Valoração econômica do meio ambiente: uma abordagem teórica e prática. São Carlos: Rima Editora/FAPESP, 138 p.
21. Motta RS. 1998. Manual para valoração econômica de recursos ambientais. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, dos Recursos Hídricos e da Amazônia Legal. Brasília: IPEA/MMA/PNUD/CNPq, 216 p.
22. Navrud S. 2001. Economic valuation of inland recreational fisheries: empirical studies and their policy use in Norway. Fish Manag Ecol 8: 369-382.
23. Ortiz RA. 2003. Valoração Econômica Ambiental. In: MAY PH, LUSTOSA MC AND Vinha V (Org), Economia do Meio Ambiente: teoria e prática. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, p. 81-99.
24. Pâté J and Loomis J. 1997. Analysis - The effect of dis- tance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California. Ecol Econ 20: 199-207.
25. Beni CB. 1998. Análise estrutural do turismo. Editora Senac, São Paulo, 427 p.
26. Breedlove J. 1999. Natural Resources: assessing nonmarket values through contingent valuation. CRS Report for Congress. Available from URL: http://www.ncseonlineãorg/NLE/CRSreports/Natural/nrgen-24.cfm (acessed in 05/01/2005).
27. Brigante J et al. 2002. Avaliação ambiental do Rio Mogi-Guaçu: resultados de uma pesquisa com abordagem ecossistêmica. São Carlos: Rima Editora, 58 p.
28. Campbell D. 2007. Willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements: combining mixed logit and random-effects models. J Agric Econ 58(3): 467-483.
29. Cantrell RN et al. 2004. Recreational anglers' willingness to pay for increased catch rates of Pacific threadfin (Polydactylus sexfilis) in Hawaii. Fish Res (68): 149-158.
30. Carvalho AR. 2002. Valoração econômico-ecológica da planície de inundação do Alto Rio Paraná. PhD Thesis, Ecology of Aquatic Continental Environments, Maringá State University, Maringá, 112 p.
31. Carvalho AR. 2007. An ecological economic approach to estimate the value of a fragmented wetland in Brazil (Mato Grosso do Sul State). Braz J Biol 67(4): 663-671.
32. Cbh-Mogi and Creupi. 1999. Diagnóstico da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Mogi-Guaçu "Relatório Zero". Available from URL: http://www.sigrh.sp.gov.br/sigrh/ARQS/RELATORIO/CRH/CBHMOGI/130/relmogiseg.pdf (accessed in 10/08/2006).
33. Champ P et al. 1997. Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods. J Env Econ Manag 33(2): 151-163.
34. Costanza R. 1991. Assuring sustainability of ecological economic systems. In: COSTANZA R (Ed), Ecological Economics: the science and management of sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press, p. 331-343.
35. Dietz BC. 2001. An analysis of statistical errors in contingent valuation surveys, Proceedings of the American Agricultural Economics Association Summer Meetings, 5-8 Aug 2001, Chicago, United States of America, 37 p. http://agecon.lib.umn.edu (accessed 25/05/2006).
36. Fearnside PM. 1997. Environmental services as a strategy for sustainable development in rural Amazonia. Ecol Econ 20: 53-70.
37. Godoy MP. 1974. Contribuição à história natural e geral de Pirassununga. Manuscrito, v.1, Pirassununga.
38. Hosmer DW and Lemeshow S. 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley-Interscience publication, 307 p.
39. Kleinbaum DG. 1996. Logistic Regression. ASelf-learning Text. New York: Springer, 282 p.
40. Loomis J et al. 2000. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecol Econ 33: 103-117.
41. Manly BFJ. 2004. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in Biology. Otago: University of Otago, 330 p.
42. Martins EC. 2002. O Turismo como alternativa de desenvolvimento sustentável: o caso de Jericoacoara no Ceará. PhD Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo - ESALq, Piracicaba, SP, 164 p.
43. Mattos KMC and Mattos A. 2004. Valoração econômica do meio ambiente: uma abordagem teórica e prática. São Carlos: Rima Editora/FAPESP, 138 p.
44. Motta RS. 1998. Manual para valoração econômica de recursos ambientais. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, dos Recursos Hídricos e da Amazônia Legal. Brasília: IPEA/MMA/PNUD/CNPq, 216 p.
45. Navrud S. 2001. Economic valuation of inland recreational fisheries: empirical studies and their policy use in Norway. Fish Manag Ecol 8: 369-382.
46. Ortiz RA. 2003. Valoração Econômica Ambiental. In: MAY PH, LUSTOSA MC AND Vinha V (Org), Economia do Meio Ambiente: teoria e prática. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, p. 81-99.
47. Pâté J and Loomis J. 1997. Analysis - The effect of dis- tance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California. Ecol Econ 20: 199-207.
48. Pauly D. 1995. Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends Ecol Evol 10(10): 430.
49. Peixer J. 2008. Características e valoração da pesca esportiva, profissional e do turismo da Cachoeira de Emas, no Rio Mogi-Guaçu/SP. PhD Thesis, Universidade do Estado de São Paulo (UNESP), Rio Claro, SP, 169 p.
50. Pessoa R and Ramos FS. 1998. Avaliação de ativos ambientais: aplicação do método de avaliação contingente. Rev Bras Econ 52(3): 405-426.
51. Pollock KH, Jones CM and Brown TL. 1994. Angler survey methods and their applications in fisheries management. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication, n. 25.
52. Quinn G and Keough M. 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 537 p.
53. Rivas A and Kahn JR. 2006. Economia Ambiental e dos recursos pesqueiros. Manaus: Editora da Universidade Federal do Amazonas, 48 p.
54. Samnaliev M, Stevens T and More T. 2003. A comparison of cheap talk and alternative certainty calibrations techniques in contingent valuation. Working paper n. 2003-11. University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Resource Economics, 30 p. http://agecon.lib.umn.edu. (accessed in 25/05/2006).
55. Santos JE et al. 2001. The value of the ecological station of Jataí's ecosystem services and natural capital. Rev Bras Biol 61(2): 171-190.
56. Toivonen AL et al. 2004. The economic value of recreational fisheries in Nordic countries. Fish Manag Ecol 11: 1-14.
57. White PCL, Bennett AC and Hayes EJV. 2001. The use of willingness-to-pay approaches in mammal conservation. Mammal Rev 31(2): 151-167.