The economic value of recreational fisheries in Nordic countries

Fisheries Management and Ecology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-14

  Toivonen, Anna Liisa ^a   Roth, E ^b   Navrud, S ^c   Gudbergsson, G ^d   Appelblad, H ^e   Bengtsson, B ^f   Tuunainen, P ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^d Institute of Freshwater Fisheries Reykjavik   (Iceland)

^e UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^f INSTITUTE OF MARINE RESEARCH   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Economic value; General linear models; Nordic countries; Recreational fishing

Indexed keywords

FISHERY ECONOMICS; FISHING; REGRESSION;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

PISCES;

EID: 1542320041     PISSN: 0969997X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2400.2003.00376.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Aas Ø. (1996) Recreational fishing in Norway from 1970 to 1993: trends and geographical variation. Fisheries Management and Ecology 3, 107-118.
2. Bohn J. & Roth E. (1997) Survey on Angling in Denmark 1997 - results and comments, In: A.-L. Toivonen & P. Tuunainen (eds) Socio-economics of Recreational Fishery. TemaNord 604, Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, pp. 79-88,
3. Cummings R.G., Brookshire D.S. & Schulze W.D. (eds) (1986) Valuing Environmental Goods. An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Totowa, NJ, USA: Rowman & Allanheld publishers, 288 pp.
4. Dillman D.A. (1978) Mail and Telephone Survey: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley, 325 pp.
5. Dougherty C. (1992) Introduction to Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press, 399 pp.
6. Mitchell R.C. & Carson R.T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC, USA: Resources for the Future, 463 pp.
7. Munasinghe M. (1992) Biodiversity protection policy: environmental valuation and distribution issues. Ambio 21, 227-236.
8. Navrud S. (2001) Economic valuation of inland recreational fisheries: empirical studies and their policy use in Norway. Fisheries Management and Ecology 8, 369-382.
9. Recreational Fishing 2000 (2002) Official Statistics of Finland. Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery 2002: 54. Helsinki: Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, 29 pp.
10. Recreational Fishing in Sweden (2000) (Fiske 2000. En undersökning om svenskarnas sport-och husbehovsfiske.) Finfo 2000: 1. Gothenburg, Sweden: National Board of Fisheries (Fiskeriverket), 53 pp. (In Swedish).
11. Riechers R.K. & Fedler A.J. (1996) An overview of economic impact and value of recreational fisheries. American Fisheries Society Symposium 16, 245-250.
12. Roth E., Toivonen A.-L., Navrud S., Bengtsson B., Gudbergsson G., Tuunainen P., Appelblad H. & Weissglas G. (2001) Methodological, conceptual and sampling practices in surveying recreational fishery in the Nordic countries - experiences of a valuation survey. Fisheries Management and Ecology 8, 355-367.
13. Toivonen A.-L., Appelblad H., Bengtsson B., Geertz-Hansen P., Gudbergsson G., Kristofersson D., Kyrkjebø H., Navrud S., Roth E., Tuunainen P. & Weissglas G. (2000) Economic Value of Recreational Fisheries in the Nordic Countries. TemaNord 604, Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, 71 pp.
14. Toivonen A.-L., Tuunainen P., Navrud S., Roth E., Bengtsson B. & Gudbergsson G. (1999) Measuring the total economic value of recreational fisheries in Scandinavia. In: T.J. Pitcher (ed.) Evaluating the benefits of recreational fishing. Papers, discussion and issues: a conference held at the UBC Fisheries Center June 1999. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 7, 150-153.
15. Walsh R.G. (1986) Recreation Economic Decisions: Comparing Benefits and Costs. State College, PA, USA: Venture Publishing Inc., 637 pp.