Do Ambivalent Women Have an Unmet Need for Family Planning? A Longitudinal Study from Bali, Indonesia

Women's Health Issues

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 444-449

  Withers, Mellissa H ^a   Tavrow, Paula ^b   Adinata, N Ardika ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c The East Bali Poverty Project   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AMBIVALENCE; ARTICLE; BIRTH CONTROL; CONTRACEPTION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE NEED; HUMAN; INDONESIA; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MARRIED WOMAN; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; UNWANTED PREGNANCY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FAMILY; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INDONESIA; INTENTION; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MARITAL STATUS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTHERS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PARITY; PARTURITION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 82755193779     PISSN: 10493867     EISSN: 18784321     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.04.031     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agadjanian V. Fraught with ambivalence: Reproductive intentions and contraceptive choices in a sub-Saharan fertility transition. Population Research and Policy Review 2005, 24:617-645.
2. Bankole A. Desired fertility and fertility behaviour among the Yoruba of Nigeria: A study of couple preferences and subsequent fertility. Population Studies 1995, 49:317-328.
3. Bankole A., Singh S. Couples' fertility and contraceptive decision-making in developing countries: Hearing the man's voice. International Family Planning Perspectives 1998, 24:15-24.
4. Bankole A., Westoff C. The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: Evidence from Morocco. Journal of Biosocial Science 1998, 30:439-455.
5. Becker S., Sutradhar S.C. Fertility intentions: Are the undecided more like those who want more or want no more children. Journal of Biosocial Science 2007, 39:137-145.
6. Belanger D. Son preference in a rural village in North Vietnam. Studies in Family Planning 2002, 33:321-334.
7. Campbell E.K., Campbell P.G. Family size and sex preferences and eventual fertility in Botswana. Journal of Biosocial Science 1997, 29:191-204.
8. Casterline J.B., Perez A.E., Biddlecom A.E. Factors underlying unmet need for family planning in the Philippines. Studies in Family Planning 1997, 28:173-191.
9. Casterline J.B., Sinding S.W. Unmet need for family planning in developing countries and implications for population policy. Population and Development Review 2000, 26:691-723.
10. Casterline J.B., El-Zanaty F., El-Zeini L.O. Unmet need and unintended pregnancy: Longitudinal evidence from Upper Egypt. International Family Planning Perspectives 2003, 29:158-166.
11. Chung W., Das Gupta M. The decline of son preference in South Korea: The roles of development and public policy. Population and Development Review 2007, 33:757-783.
12. Das Gupta M., Zhenghua J., Bohua L., Zhenming X., Chung W., Hwa-Ok B. Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. Journal of Development Studies 2003, 40:153-187.
13. Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). (2007). Country profile: Indonesia. Avaialble: Accessed June 5, 2010. http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/FR147/00FrontMatter.pdf.
14. De Silva W.I. Consistency between reproductive preferences and behavior: The Sri Lankan experience. Studies in Family Planning 1991, 22:188-197.
15. Dixon-Mueller R., Germain A. Fertility regulation and reproductive health in the Millennium Development Goals: The search for a perfect indicator. American Journal of Public Health 2007, 97:45-51.
16. El-Zeini L.O. The path to replacement fertility in Egypt: Acceptance, preference, and achievement. Studies in Family Planning 2008, 39:161-176.
17. Hank K. Parental gender preferences and reproductive behaviour: A review of the recent literature. Journal of Biosocial Sciences 2007, 39:759-767.
18. Haughton J., Haughton D. Son preference in Vietnam. Studies in Family Planning 1995, 26:325-337.
19. Hussain R., Fikree F.F., Berendes H.W. The role of son preference in reproductive behaviour in Pakistan. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2000, 78:379-388.
20. Islam M.M., Bairagi R. Fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour in Matlab: Do fertility intentions matter?. Journal of Biosocial Science 2003, 35:615-619.
21. Kabir M., Amin R., Ahmed A.U., Chowdhury J. Factors affecting desired family size in Bangladesh. Journal of Biosocial Science 1994, 26:369-375.
22. Pong S.L. Sex preference and fertility in Peninsular Malaysia. Studies in Family Planning 1994, 25:137-148.
23. Poston D.L. Son preference and fertility in China. Journal of Biosocial Sciences 2002, 34:333-347.
24. Rahman, M., Da Vanzo, J., & Razzaque, A. (2001). When will Bangladesh reach replacement fertility? The role of education and family planning services. Available: Accessed June 8, 2010. http://www.un.org.
25. Roy T.K., Ram F., Saha U., Khan N. Can women's childbearing and contraceptive intentions predict contraceptive demand? Findings from a longitudinal study in central India. International Family Planning Perspectives 2003, 29:25-31.
26. Roy T.K., Sinha R.K., Koenig M., Mohanty S.K., Patel S.K. Consistency and predictive ability of fertility preference indicators: Longitudinal evidence from rural India. International Family Planning Perspectives 2008, 34:138-145.
27. Schaeffer N.C., Thomson E. The discovery of grounded uncertainty: Developing standardized questions about strength of fertility motivation. Sociological Methodology 1992, 22:37-82.
28. Speizer I. Using strength of fertility motivations to identify family planning program strategies. International Family Planning Perspectives 2006, 32:185-191.
29. Speizer I., Irani L., Barden-O'Fallon J., Levy J. Inconsistent fertility motivations and contraceptive use behaviors among women in Honduras. Reproductive Health 2009, 6:10.
30. Sundari Raindran T.K., Mishra U.S. Unmet need for reproductive health in India. Reproductive Health Matters 2001, 9:105-113.
31. Tan P.C., Tey N.P. Do fertility intentions predict subsequent behavior? Evidence from Peninsular Malaysia. Studies in Family Planning 1994, 25:222-231.
32. United Nations Population Division. (2009). World Contraceptive Use 2009. Available: Accessed April 25, 2011. http://www.un.org.
33. Vlassoff C. Fertility intentions and subsequent behavior: A longitudinal study in rural India. Studies in Family Planning 1990, 21:216-225.
34. Westley S.B., Choe M.K. How does son preference affect populations in Asia?. Asian Pacific Issues 2007, 84:1-12.
35. Westoff C.F. Predictive validity of reproductive intentions. Demography 1977, 14:431-452.
36. Williams L., Abma J., Piccinino L.J. The correspondence between intention to avoid childbearing and subsequent fertility: A prospective analysis. Family Planning Perspectives 1999, 31:220-227.
37. Wongboonsin K., Ruffolo V.P. Sex preference for children in Thailand and some other South East Asian Countries. Asia Pacific Population Journal 1995, 10:43-62.